Perspectives of End Users on the Potential Use of Trunk Exoskeletons for People With Low-Back Pain: A Focus Group Study

Objective The objective of this study was to identify criteria to be considered when developing an exoskeleton for low-back pain patients by exploring the perceptions and expectations of potential end users. Background Psychosocial, psychological, physical load, and personality influence incidence of low-back pain. Body-worn assistive devices that passively support the user’s trunk, that is exoskeletons, can decrease mechanical loading and potentially reduce low-back pain. A user-centered approach improves patient safety and health outcomes, increases user satisfaction, and ensures usability. Still, previous studies have not taken psychological factors and the early involvement of end users into account. Method We conducted focus group studies with low-back pain patients (n = 4) and health care professionals (n = 8). Focus group sessions were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed, using the general inductive approach. The focus group discussions included trying out an available exoskeleton. Questions were designed to elicit opinions about exoskeletons, desired design specifications, and usability. Results Important design characteristics were comfort, individual adjustability, independency in taking it on and off, and gradual adjustment of support. Patients raised concerns over loss of muscle strength. Health care professionals mentioned the risk of confirming disability of the user and increasing guarded movement in patients. Conclusion The focus groups showed that implementation of a trunk exoskeleton to reduce low-back pain requires an adequate implementation strategy, including supervision and behavioral coaching. Application For health care professionals, the optimal field of application, prevention or rehabilitation, is still under debate. Patients see potential in an exoskeleton to overcome their limitations and expect it to improve their quality of life.

[1]  G. Baxter,et al.  The association between health care professional attitudes and beliefs and the attitudes and beliefs, clinical management, and outcomes of patients with low back pain: A systematic review , 2012, European journal of pain.

[2]  J. Kitzinger,et al.  Qualitative Research: Introducing focus groups , 1995 .

[3]  D. Cole,et al.  Individual participant data meta-analysis of mechanical workplace risk factors and low back pain. , 2012, American journal of public health.

[4]  A. Starkweather,et al.  Low back pain. , 2015, Nursing.

[5]  David Stewart,et al.  Focus groups: Theory and practice, 2nd ed. , 2007 .

[6]  J. Chenot,et al.  Non-Specific Low Back Pain. , 2017, Deutsches Arzteblatt international.

[7]  ANNETTE DE VITO DABBS,et al.  User-Centered Design and Interactive Health Technologies for Patients , 2009, Computers, informatics, nursing : CIN.

[8]  H. Flor,et al.  Low-Back Pain Patients Learn to Adapt Motor Behavior With Adverse Secondary Consequences , 2017, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.

[9]  J. Todd The errors of medicine. , 1970, Lancet.

[10]  Idsart Kingma,et al.  Foot positioning instruction, initial vertical load position and lifting technique: effects on low back loading , 2004, Ergonomics.

[11]  Deborah Hill,et al.  WHAT ARE USER PERSPECTIVES OF EXOSKELETON TECHNOLOGY? A LITERATURE REVIEW , 2017, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[12]  Anne Bruseberg,et al.  Focus groups to support the industrial/product designer: a review based on current literature and designers' feedback. , 2002, Applied ergonomics.

[13]  F. Blyth,et al.  Patients’ and Physiotherapists’ Views on Triggers for Low Back Pain , 2016, Spine.

[14]  Virginia Braun,et al.  Successful Qualitative Research: A practical guide for beginners , 2013, QMiP Bulletin.

[15]  W S Marras,et al.  The effects of motion on trunk biomechanics. , 2000, Clinical biomechanics.

[16]  Paul W. Hodges,et al.  Moving differently in pain: A new theory to explain the adaptation to pain , 2011, PAIN.

[17]  P. O'Sullivan It's time for change with the management of non-specific chronic low back pain , 2011, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[18]  J H van Dieën,et al.  The effects of ergonomic interventions on low back moments are attenuated by changes in lifting behaviour , 2007, Ergonomics.

[19]  Simon Judge,et al.  User involvement in the early development of assistive technology devices , 2011 .

[20]  C. Hildingsson,et al.  Low back pain, lifestyle factors and physical activity: a population based-study. , 2008, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[21]  R Z Omar,et al.  Factors affecting self-efficacy and pain intensity in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain seen in a specialist rheumatology pain clinic. , 2008, Rheumatology.

[22]  S J Linton,et al.  A review of psychological risk factors in back and neck pain. , 2000, Spine.

[23]  J Gosbee,et al.  Human factors engineering and patient safety , 2002, Quality & safety in health care.

[24]  H. Houdijk,et al.  The effect of a passive trunk exoskeleton on functional performance in healthy individuals. , 2018, Applied ergonomics.

[25]  P. Oesch,et al.  Measurement Properties of the Modified Spinal Function Sort (M-SFS): Is It Reliable and Valid in Workers with Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain? , 2017, Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation.

[26]  S. Woby,et al.  Self‐efficacy mediates the relation between pain‐related fear and outcome in chronic low back pain patients , 2007, European journal of pain.

[27]  Michael J Agnew,et al.  Effectiveness of an on-body lifting aid at reducing low back physical demands during an automotive assembly task: assessment of EMG response and user acceptability. , 2009, Applied ergonomics.

[28]  Joan M Stevenson,et al.  Mathematical and empirical proof of principle for an on-body personal lift augmentation device (PLAD). , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[29]  George Dowswell,et al.  Guest editorial: public and user 'involvement' in the UK National Health Service. , 2002, Health & social care in the community.

[30]  I. Kingma,et al.  Effect of lifting height and load mass on low back loading , 2008, Ergonomics.

[31]  Frank Krause,et al.  Exoskeletons for industrial application and their potential effects on physical work load , 2016, Ergonomics.

[32]  Idsart Kingma,et al.  Effects of a passive exoskeleton on the mechanical loading of the low back in static holding tasks. , 2019, Journal of biomechanics.

[33]  T. Waters,et al.  The Impact of Mental Processing and Pacing on Spine Loading: 2002 Volvo Award in Biomechanics , 2002, Spine.

[34]  Fadi A Fathallah,et al.  Effect of a personal weight transfer device on muscle activities and joint flexions in the stooped posture. , 2013, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[35]  W. G. Allread,et al.  The Influence of Psychosocial Stress, Gender, and Personality on Mechanical Loading of the Lumbar Spine , 2000, Spine.

[36]  Homayoon Kazerooni,et al.  Lower Extremity Exoskeleton Reduces Back Forces in Lifting , 2009 .

[37]  A. Field,et al.  A Systematic Review of Psychological Factors as Predictors of Chronicity/Disability in Prospective Cohorts of Low Back Pain , 2002, Spine.