User Interface Preferences in the Design of a Camera-Based Navigation and Wayfinding Aid

Introduction Development of a sensing device that can provide a sufficient perceptual substrate for persons with visual impairments to orient themselves and travel confidently has been a persistent rehabilitation technology goal, with the user interface posing a significant challenge. In the study presented here, we enlist the advice and ideas of individuals who are blind with respect to this challenge, for an envisioned camera-based aid to navigation and wayfinding. Methods We administered a short questionnaire about user preferences and needs for such a device to a sample of 10 well-educated, employed (or retired) visually impaired participants with light perception or less, who were familiar and comfortable with assistive technology. Generally, the items were rankings of relative priority. Results Participants preferred speech as a communications medium for navigating the environment; preferred controlling the auditory display by querying the system rather than interacting via a menu or receiving a stream of continuous speech; and preferred providing input to the system through a keypad rather than through a voice recognition system. Architectural features such as doors and stairs were ranked the most important environmental objects to be located with such a device (over furniture, persons, personal items, and even text signs). Discussion Our sample reported a desire for devices that can guide them to architectural features of their environment. They appear to prefer device interfaces that give them control, and would rather query a system than interact with a menu. They prefer unobtrusive input on a device via keypad rather than through voice recognition. Implications for practitioners Designers of camera-based navigation devices may wish to consider the preferences of our sample by incorporating a query-based interface with simple keypad input and speech output, and to include in their object recognition efforts the goal of identifying architectural features that are significant to users who are blind in navigation.

[1]  D. Bolgiano,et al.  A laser cane for the blind , 1967 .

[2]  BENJAMIN WHITE,et al.  Vision Substitution by Tactile Image Projection , 1969, Nature.

[3]  L. Kay,et al.  A sonar aid to enhance spatial perception of the blind: engineering design and evaluation , 1974 .

[4]  Iwan Ulrich,et al.  The GuideCane-a computerized travel aid for the active guidance of blind pedestrians , 1997, Proceedings of International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[5]  Roberta L. Klatzky,et al.  Navigation System for the Blind: Auditory Display Modes and Guidance , 1998, Presence.

[6]  P. Bach-y-Rita,et al.  Form perception with a 49-point electrotactile stimulus array on the tongue: a technical note. , 1998, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[7]  J. Cronly-Dillon,et al.  The perception of visual images encoded in musical form: a study in cross-modality information transfer , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[8]  Avinash C. Kak,et al.  Vision for Mobile Robot Navigation: A Survey , 2002, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[9]  Tohru Ifukube,et al.  Maximum listening speeds for the blind , 2003 .

[10]  P. Bach-y-Rita,et al.  Sensory substitution and the human–machine interface , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[11]  Roberta L. Klatzky,et al.  Stated Preferences for Components of a Personal Guidance System for Nonvisual Navigation , 2004 .

[12]  M. Tyler,et al.  Brainport: an alternative input to the brain. , 2005, Journal of integrative neuroscience.

[13]  G. Legge,et al.  Wayfinding with words: spatial learning and navigation using dynamically updated verbal descriptions , 2007, Psychological research.

[14]  Francisco Bonin-Font,et al.  Visual Navigation for Mobile Robots: A Survey , 2008, J. Intell. Robotic Syst..

[15]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Blind Navigation and the Role of Technology , 2008 .

[16]  Gert Jan Gelderblom,et al.  Inventory of Electronic Mobility Aids for Persons with Visual Impairments: A Literature Review , 2008 .

[17]  Sumi Helal,et al.  The Engineering Handbook of Smart Technology for Aging, Disability, and Independence , 2008 .

[18]  Nikolaos G. Bourbakis,et al.  Wearable Obstacle Avoidance Electronic Travel Aids for Blind: A Survey , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews).

[19]  Yingli Tian,et al.  Improving Computer Vision-Based Indoor Wayfinding for Blind Persons with Context Information , 2010, ICCHP.

[20]  Xiaodong Yang,et al.  Computer Vision-Based Door Detection for Accessibility of Unfamiliar Environments to Blind Persons , 2010, ICCHP.

[21]  Roberto Manduchi,et al.  (Computer) vision without sight , 2012, Commun. ACM.

[22]  Klaus Miesenberger,et al.  Computers Helping People with Special Needs : 15th International Conference, ICCHP 2016, Linz, Austria, July 13-15, 2016, Proceedings, Part II , 2012 .