Multitaper Spectral Granger Causality with Application to Ssvep

The traditional parametric approach to Granger causality (GC), based on linear vector autoregressive modeling, suffers from difficulties related to the inaccurate modeling of the generative process. These limits can be solved by using nonparametric spectral estimates in the frequency-domain formulation of GC, also known as spectral GC. In a simulation study, we compare the mean square error of the estimated spectral GC using different multitaper spectral estimators, finding that the Peak Matched multitapers are preferable for estimating spectral GC characterized by peaks. As an illustrative example, we apply the non-parametric approach to the analysis of brain functional connectivity in steady-state visually evoked potentials.

[1]  C. Herrmann.  Human EEG responses to 1–100 Hz flicker: resonance phenomena in visual cortex and their potential correlation to cognitive phenomena , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[2]  W. Singer,et al.  Neural Synchrony in Cortical Networks: History, Concept and Current Status , 2009, Front. Integr. Neurosci..

[3]  M. Boly,et al.  Granger Causality Analysis of Steady-State Electroencephalographic Signals during Propofol-Induced Anaesthesia , 2012, PloS one.

[4]  G. Wilson.  The Factorization of Matricial Spectral Densities , 1972 .

[5]  Maria Hansson-Sandsten.  Evaluation of the optimal lengths and number of multiple windows for spectrogram estimation of SSVEP. , 2010, Medical engineering & physics.

[6]  Maria Hansson,et al.  A multiple window method for estimation of peaked spectra , 1997, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[7]  P. Welch.  The use of fast Fourier transform for the estimation of power spectra: A method based on time averaging over short, modified periodograms , 1967 .

[8]  J. Geweke,et al.  Measurement of Linear Dependence and Feedback between Multiple Time Series , 1982 .

[9]  Mingzhou Ding,et al.  Analyzing information flow in brain networks with nonparametric Granger causality , 2008, NeuroImage.

[10]  M. Hansson.  Optimized weighted averaging of peak matched multiple window spectrum estimators , 1999, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[11]  Hualou Liang,et al.  Short-window spectral analysis of cortical event-related potentials by adaptive multivariate autoregressive modeling: data preprocessing, model validation, and variability assessment , 2000, Biological Cybernetics.

[12]  Yangsong Zhang,et al.  The enhanced information flow from visual cortex to frontal area facilitates SSVEP response: evidence from model-driven and data-driven causality analysis , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[13]  S. Bressler,et al.  Granger Causality: Basic Theory and Application to Neuroscience , 2006, q-bio/0608035.

[14]  Luca Faes,et al.  Wiener–Granger Causality in Network Physiology With Applications to Cardiovascular Control and Neuroscience , 2016, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[15]  Steven L. Bressler,et al.  Wiener–Granger Causality: A well established methodology , 2011, NeuroImage.

[16]  D. Thomson,et al.  Spectrum estimation and harmonic analysis , 1982, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[17]  P. Suffczynski,et al.  On the Quantification of SSVEP Frequency Responses in Human EEG in Realistic BCI Conditions , 2013, PloS one.

[18]  Anil K. Seth,et al.  The MVGC multivariate Granger causality toolbox: A new approach to Granger-causal inference , 2014, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[19]  C. Granger.  Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods , 1969 .

[20]  S. Bressler,et al.  Stochastic modeling of neurobiological time series: power, coherence, Granger causality, and separation of evoked responses from ongoing activity. , 2006, Chaos.