Fuel classification and mapping from satellite imagines

This paper summarizes the fuel type systems currently adopted by the fire danger rating systems or fire behavior prediction systems of some countries, such as Canada, the United States, Australia, Greece, and Switzerland. As an example, the Canadian Forest Fire Danger Rating System organizes fuel types into five major groups, with a total of 16 discrete fuel types recognized. In the United States National Fire Danger Rating System, fuel models are divided into four vegetation groups and twenty fire behavior fuel models. The Promethus System (Greece) divides fuels into 7 types, and Australia has adopted only three distinct fuel types: open grasslands, dry eucalyptus forests, and heath/shrublands. Four approaches to mapping fuels are acceptable: field reconnaissance, direct mapping methods, indirect mapping methods, and gradient modeling. Satellite remote-sensing techniques provide an alternative source of obtaining fuel data quickly, since they provide comprehensive spatial coverage and enough temporal resolution to update fuel maps in a more efficient and timely manner than traditional aerial photography or fieldwork. Satellite sensors can also provide digital information that can be easily tied into other spatial databases using Geographic Information System (GIS) analysis, which can be used as input in fire behavior and growth models. Various fuel-mapping methods from satellite remote sensing are discussed in the paper. According to the analysis of the fuel mapping techniques worldwide, this paper suggests that China should first create appropriate fuel types for its fire agencies before embarking on developing a national fire danger rating system to improve the current data situation for it's fire management programs.

[1]  M. Finney FARSITE : Fire Area Simulator : model development and evaluation , 1998 .

[2]  Robert De Wulf,et al.  Extraction of forest stand parameters from panchromatic and multispectral SPOT-1 data , 1990 .

[3]  T. Loveland Toward a national fuels mapping strategy: Lessons from selected mapping programs , 2001 .

[4]  John R. Jensen,et al.  Introductory Digital Image Processing: A Remote Sensing Perspective , 1986 .

[5]  Mark A. Finney,et al.  FARSITE: a fire area simulator for fire managers , 1995 .

[6]  H. Anderson Aids to Determining Fuel Models for Estimating Fire Behavior , 1982 .

[7]  B. Oswald,et al.  Classifying fuels with aerial photography in East Texas , 1999 .

[8]  D. Riaño,et al.  Generation of fuel type maps from Landsat TM images and ancillary data in Mediterranean ecosystems , 2002 .

[9]  Domingos Xavier Viegas,et al.  Forest Fire Research & Wildland Fire Safety , 2002 .

[10]  P. Andrews BEHAVE : Fire Behavior Prediction and Fuel Modeling System - BURN Subsystem, Part 1 , 1986 .

[11]  J. San-Miguel-Ayanz,et al.  Integration of satellite sensor data, fuel type maps and meteorological observations for evaluation of forest fire risk at the pan-European scale , 2002 .

[12]  Kenneth P. Davis Forest Fire: Control and Use , 1959 .

[13]  I. Gitas,et al.  Object-oriented classification modelling for fuel type mapping in the Mediterranean, using LANDSAT TM and IKONOS imagery- preliminary results , 2002 .

[14]  R. Keane,et al.  Mapping wildland fuels for fire management across multiple scales: Integrating remote sensing, GIS, and biophysical modeling , 2001 .

[15]  E. Chuvieco,et al.  Modeling forest fire danger from geographic information systems , 1998 .

[16]  Robert O. Green,et al.  Temporal and spatial patterns in vegetation and atmospheric properties from AVIRIS , 1997 .

[17]  Zhiliang Zhu,et al.  US forest types and predicted percent forest cover from AVHRR data , 1994 .

[18]  C. Dymond,et al.  Characterizing and mapping fuels for Malaysia and western Indonesia , 2004 .