Safety, Effectiveness, and Subjective Experience with Topical Bimatoprost 0.03% for Eyelash Growth

BACKGROUND Ocularly applied bimatoprost 0.03% is associated with increased eyelash growth. OBJECTIVE To assess the safety, efficacy, and subjective experience of using dermal application of bimatoprost 0.03% for the growth of natural eyelashes. METHODS Prospective, open‐label study of subjects who desired longer, thicker (fuller), and darker natural eyelashes. Bimatoprost was applied to the upper lid margin once daily for 12 weeks. Adverse events and intraocular pressure were assessed, and subjects completed health outcomes questionnaires. Eyelash growth and darkening were scored using photographs taken at weeks 1 and 12. RESULTS All subjects were female (N=28). No serious or unexpected adverse events were reported. The mean change from baseline intraocular pressure was less than 1 mmHg at each time point, but was statistically significant at weeks 1 and 4 (p≤.047). At week 12, all subjects had noticed significant growth or darkening. Post hoc analysis of photographs corroborated these reports (p<.001). CONCLUSION Bimatoprost was found safe for eyelid application and was associated with enhanced eyelash growth. All subjects noticed favorable changes in the appearance of their eyelashes. This study was funded by an unrestricted investigator‐initiated research grant from Allergan, Inc., Irvine, CA. J. Walt is a health outcomes researcher and an employee of Allergan. Steve Yoelin and Melissa Earl have no proprietary interest in bimatoprost ophthalmic solution 0.03% or in Allergan, Inc. Medical writing assistance provided by Elizabeth Davis, PhD, Pacific Communications, Costa Mesa, CA. Editorial assistance provided by Health Learning Systems, Parsippany, NJ. Funding for editorial assistance provided by Allergan, Inc., Irvine, CA.

[1]  R. Gross,et al.  Long-term efficacy and safety of bimatoprost for intraocular pressure lowering in glaucoma and ocular hypertension: year 4 , 2008, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[2]  D. Woodward,et al.  Prostamides (prostaglandin‐ethanolamides) and their pharmacology , 2008, British journal of pharmacology.

[3]  L. Cantor,et al.  Intraocular pressure-lowering efficacy of bimatoprost 0.03% and travoprost 0.004% in patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension , 2006, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[4]  A. A. Bodla,et al.  Hypertrichosis of the eyelashes from prostaglandin analog use: a blessing or a bother to the patient? , 2006, Journal of ocular pharmacology and therapeutics : the official journal of the Association for Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics.

[5]  R. Kapur,et al.  Bimatoprost-induced periocular skin hyperpigmentation: histopathological study. , 2005, Archives of ophthalmology.

[6]  S. Kondo,et al.  Influence of prostaglandin F2α and its analogues on hair regrowth and follicular melanogenesis in a murine model , 2005, Experimental dermatology.

[7]  S. Whitcup,et al.  Two-year double-masked comparison of bimatoprost with timolol in patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension. , 2004, Survey of ophthalmology.

[8]  S. Whitcup,et al.  A randomised, double masked, multicentre clinical trial comparing bimatoprost and timolol for the treatment of glaucoma and ocular hypertension , 2003, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[9]  J. Schuman,et al.  One-year, randomized study comparing bimatoprost and timolol in glaucoma and ocular hypertension. , 2002, Archives of ophthalmology.

[10]  D. Albert,et al.  Prostaglandin-induced hair growth. , 2002, Survey of ophthalmology.

[11]  S. Gandolfi,et al.  Three-month comparison of bimatoprost and latanoprost in patients with glaucoma and ocular hypertension , 2001, Advances in therapy.

[12]  Francis Heed Adler,et al.  Adler's Physiology of the eye;: Clinical application , 1976 .

[13]  S. Whitcup,et al.  A six-month randomized clinical trial comparing the intraocular pressure-lowering efficacy of bimatoprost and latanoprost in patients with ocular hypertension or glaucoma. , 2003, American journal of ophthalmology.