Survival rates for porcelain laminate veneers with special reference to the effect of preparation in dentin: a literature review.

UNLABELLED The porcelain laminate veneer is an elective restoration, often placed in the absence of disease for purely esthetic reasons. As such, it would appear desirable that the success rate of the technique was 100%. It is therefore the purpose of this paper to review the literature on porcelain laminate veneer survival by searching dental databases containing clinical trials of porcelain veneer restorations. References of selected trials were also screened to identify relevant studies. Each paper that was included was examined to ascertain if preparation into dentin affected survival. A total of 24 papers were included in the review. It was concluded that survival rates of porcelain laminate veneers are rarely 100%, and there is reasonable evidence indicating that a veneer preparation into dentin adversely affects survival. CLINICAL RELEVANCE A review of the literature has indicated that porcelain laminate veneer survival is rarely 100%. Accordingly, patients should be made aware of this before embarking on this elective restorative technique. Clinicians should also be aware that the ideal preparation for porcelain veneers remains within enamel.

[1]  H. Nordbø,et al.  Clinical performance of porcelain laminate veneers without incisal overlapping: 3-year results. , 1994, Journal of dentistry.

[2]  C. Pincus Building mouth personality , 1938 .

[3]  L. A. Weinberg Tooth preparation for porcelain laminates. , 1989, The New York state dental journal.

[4]  S. Karlsson,et al.  A clinical evaluation of ceramic laminate veneers. , 1992, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[5]  J. Calamia Clinical evaluation of etched porcelain veneers. , 1989, American journal of dentistry.

[6]  Christine S. Calamia,et al.  Porcelain laminate veneers: reasons for 25 years of success. , 2007, Dental clinics of North America.

[7]  P. Marquis,et al.  Clinical performance of porcelain laminate veneers. A retrospective evaluation over a period of 6.5 years. , 1997, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[8]  D. Nathanson,et al.  Clinical evaluation of etched porcelain veneers over a period of 18 to 42 months. , 1989, Journal of esthetic dentistry.

[9]  M. Fradeani,et al.  Porcelain laminate veneers: 6- to 12-year clinical evaluation--a retrospective study. , 2005, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[10]  H. S. Çötert,et al.  The effect of various preparation designs on the survival of porcelain laminate veneers. , 2009, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[11]  M. Friedman,et al.  Masters of Esthetic Dentistry , 2001 .

[12]  M. Friedman,et al.  Porcelain veneer restorations: a clinician's opinion about a disturbing trend. , 2001, Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.].

[13]  Petra C Guess,et al.  Midterm results of a 5-year prospective clinical investigation of extended ceramic veneers. , 2008, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[14]  Horn Hr A new lamination: porcelain bonded to enamel. , 1983 .

[15]  B Van Meerbeek,et al.  Porcelain veneers: a review of the literature. , 2000, Journal of dentistry.

[16]  C. Kreulen,et al.  [Meta-analysis of anterior veneer restorations in clinical studies]. , 2001, Nederlands tijdschrift voor tandheelkunde.

[17]  T. Kerschbaum,et al.  Clinical long-term results with 617 Cerec veneers: a nine-year report. , 2005, International journal of computerized dentistry.

[18]  M. Buonocore A Simple Method of Increasing the Adhesion of Acrylic Filling Materials to Enamel Surfaces , 1955, Journal of dental research.

[19]  A. Gilmour,et al.  Porcelain veneers: a preliminary review , 1988, British Dental Journal.

[20]  A. Walls The use of adhesively retained all-porcelain veneers during the management of fractured and worn anterior teeth: Part 1. Clinical technique , 1995, British Dental Journal.

[21]  A. Buj-Bello,et al.  The glossary of prosthodontic terms. , 2005, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[22]  G. Aristidis,et al.  Five-year clinical performance of porcelain laminate veneers. , 2002, Quintessence international.

[23]  Theodore P Croll Dentistry ... we have a problem. , 2003, Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.].

[24]  M. Friedman A 15-year review of porcelain veneer failure--a clinician's observations. , 1998, Compendium of continuing education in dentistry.

[25]  W. La Tooth preparation for porcelain laminates. , 1989 .

[26]  Mei Wang,et al.  Clinical evaluation of 546 tetracycline-stained teeth treated with porcelain laminate veneers. , 2005, Journal of dentistry.

[27]  J. Mixson,et al.  Clinical evaluation of restored maxillary incisors: veneers vs. PFM crowns. , 1995, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[28]  R. Simonsen Commerce versus care: troubling trends in the ethics of esthetic dentistry. , 2007, Dental clinics of North America.

[29]  S. Patroni,et al.  Measurement of enamel thickness in relation to reduction for etched laminate veneers. , 1992, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[30]  L. W. Blank,et al.  Clinical evaluation of castable ceramic veneers. , 1992, Journal of esthetic dentistry.

[31]  R. Smales,et al.  Long-term survival of porcelain laminate veneers using two preparation designs: A retrospective study , 2004, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[32]  P. F. Allen,et al.  Retrospective study on the performance of porcelain laminate veneers delivered by undergraduate dental students. , 2005, The European journal of prosthodontics and restorative dentistry.

[33]  D. Barnes,et al.  The clinical longevity of porcelain veneers: a 48-month clinical evaluation. , 1998, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[34]  S. Dunne,et al.  A longitudinal study of the clinical performance of porcelain veneers , 1993, British Dental Journal.

[35]  E. Ozel,et al.  Five-year clinical evaluation of 300 teeth restored with porcelain laminate veneers using total-etch and a modified self-etch adhesive system. , 2009, Operative dentistry.

[36]  A W Walls,et al.  The use of adhesively retained all-porcelain veneers during the management of fractured and worn anterior teeth: Part 2. Clinical results after 5 years of follow-up , 1995, British Dental Journal.

[37]  P Magne,et al.  Effect of luting composite shrinkage and thermal loads on the stress distribution in porcelain laminate veneers. , 1999, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[38]  H. Dumfahrt,et al.  Porcelain laminate veneers. A retrospective evaluation after 1 to 10 years of service: Part II--Clinical results. , 2000, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[39]  M. MacEntee,et al.  Porcelain and resin veneers clinically evaluated: 2-year results. , 1990, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[40]  M. Fradeani Six-year follow-up with Empress veneers. , 1998, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[41]  N. Creugers,et al.  Survival of three types of veneer restorations in a clinical trial: a 2.5-year interim evaluation. , 1998, Journal of dentistry.

[42]  P. Lambrechts,et al.  A prospective ten-year clinical trial of porcelain veneers. , 2004, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[43]  F. Burke,et al.  Ten-year outcome of porcelain laminate veneers placed within the general dental services in England and Wales. , 2009, Journal of dentistry.

[44]  P. Lambrechts,et al.  Five-year clinical performance of porcelain veneers. , 1998, Quintessence international.

[45]  Friedman Mj Porcelain veneer restorations: a clinician's opinion about a disturbing trend. , 2001 .

[46]  D. Layton,et al.  An up to 16-year prospective study of 304 porcelain veneers. , 2007, The International journal of prosthodontics.