CFD Studies of Indoor Airflow and Contaminant Particle Transportation

This article presents a numerical study of indoor airflows and contaminant particle transportation in three ventilated rooms. The realizable k − ϵ model is employed to model the air-phase turbulence, while the Lagrangian particle tracking model is utilized for the particle-phase simulation. The predicted air-phase velocities and contaminant particle concentrations are validated against the experimental data obtained from the literature. In the first case, the realizable k − ϵ model successfully captures the flow trend and reasonably predicts the airflow velocity. The realizable k − ϵ model under-predicts the vertical air velocities along the vertical inlet jet axis by 11% at x = 0.219 m, which is slightly better than the standard k − ϵ model error of 17%. In a two-zone room case, the realizable k − ϵ model, combined with a Lagrangian particle tracking model, predicts the particle concentration decay with the highest normalized difference being 24%. In the third case, the influence of particle size, location of particle resource, and particle-wall collision on the particle concentrations is investigated by the realizable k − ϵ model and the Lagrangian model. It is found that for relatively small particles (diameter ≤ 10 μm), the particle concentration may be insensitive to the particle diameter. In addition it has been observed that the particle-collision model may have considerable effect on the particle concentration prediction.

[1]  Jiyuan Tu,et al.  Numerical studies of indoor airflow and particle dispersion by large Eddy simulation , 2007 .

[2]  Jiyuan Tu,et al.  On the numerical study of contaminant particle concentration in indoor airflow , 2006 .

[3]  A. H. Reis,et al.  Indoor Deposition and Forced Re-suspension of Respirable Particles , 2005 .

[4]  Amy J. Morgan,et al.  Numerical and experimental investigation of the morphology development of expansion clouds by a powder jet flow , 2004 .

[5]  Derek Dunn-Rankin,et al.  Measurement and prediction of indoor air flow in a model room , 2003 .

[6]  M. Woloszyn,et al.  Numerical prediction of indoor air humidity and its effect on indoor environment , 2003 .

[7]  D. Dunn-Rankin,et al.  Transport of surgically produced aerosols in an operating room. , 1998, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[8]  Sture Holmberg,et al.  Modelling of the Indoor Environment – Particle Dispersion and Deposition , 1998 .

[9]  H. Fissan,et al.  Turbulent particle deposition on a horizontal circular plate , 1997 .

[10]  Saffa Riffat,et al.  Modelling and measurement of airflow and aerosol particle distribution in a ventilated two-zone chamber , 1996 .

[11]  Wan Ki Chow,et al.  Application of Computational Fluid Dynamics in building services engineering , 1996 .

[12]  Qingyan Chen COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT k-ε MODELS FOR INDOOR AIR FLOW COMPUTATIONS , 1995 .

[13]  T. Shih,et al.  A new k-ϵ eddy viscosity model for high reynolds number turbulent flows , 1995 .

[14]  Qingyan Chen,et al.  Control of Airborne Particle Concentration and Draught Risk in an Operating Room , 1992 .

[15]  John C. LaRue,et al.  The decay power law in grid-generated turbulence , 1990, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[16]  B. P. Leonard,et al.  ULTRA-SHARP Nonoscillatory Convection Schemes for High-Speed Steady Multidimensional Flow , 1990 .

[17]  Bin Zhao,et al.  Comparison of indoor aerosol particle concentration and deposition in different ventilated rooms by numerical method , 2004 .

[18]  K. Chung,et al.  Three-dimensional analysis of airflow and contaminant particle transport in a partitioned enclosure , 1998 .

[19]  Kikuo Okuyama,et al.  Numerical Simulation and Experiment on the Transport of Fine Particles in a Ventilated Room , 1996 .

[20]  R. W. Rasmussen,et al.  Ventilation requirements in hospital operating rooms. I: Control of airborne particles , 1986 .

[21]  Douglas W. Cooper,et al.  Particulate Contamination and Microelectronics Manufacturing: An Introduction , 1986 .