Evaluation of external exposures of the population of Ozyorsk, Russia, with luminescence measurements of bricks

Recently discovered historical documents indicate that large releases of noble gases (mainly 41Ar and radioactive isotopes of Kr and Xe) from the Mayak Production Association (MPA) over the period from 1948 to 1956 may have caused considerable external exposures of both, inhabitants of Ozyorsk and former inhabitants of villages at the upper Techa River. To quantify this exposure, seven brick samples from three buildings in Ozyorsk, located 8–10 km north-northwest from the radioactive gas release points, were taken. The absorbed dose in brick was measured in a depth interval of 3–13 mm below the exposed surface of the bricks by means of the thermoluminescence (TL) and the optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) method. Generally, luminescence properties using TL were more favorable for precise dose determination than using OSL, but within their uncertainties the results from both methods agree well with each other. The absorbed dose due to natural radiation was assessed and subtracted under the assumption of the bricks to be completely dry. The weighted average of the anthropogenic dose for all samples measured by TL and OSL is 10 ± 9 and 1 ± 9 mGy, respectively. An upper limit for a possible anthropogenic dose in brick that would not be detected due to the measurement uncertainties is estimated at 24 mGy. This corresponds to an effective dose of about 21 mSv. A similar range of values is obtained in recently published dispersion calculations that were based on reconstructed MPA releases. It is concluded that the release of radioactive noble gases from the radiochemical and reactor plants at Mayak PA did not lead to a significant external exposure of the population of Ozyorsk. In addition, the study demonstrates the detection limit for anthropogenic doses in ca. 60-year-old bricks to be about 24 mGy, if luminescence methods are used.

[1]  V. Baturin,et al.  Investigations of thermoluminescence dosimetry in the Techa river flood plain: analysis of the new results. , 2002, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[2]  Y. Ichikawa,et al.  Dosimetry of Atomic Bomb Radiation in Hiroshima by Thermoluminescence of Roof Tiles , 1963, Science.

[3]  A. Murray,et al.  Retrospective dosimetry: estimation of the dose to quartz using the single-aliquot regenerative-dose protocol. , 2000, Applied Radiation and Isotopes.

[4]  J. Kučera,et al.  On the internal radioactivity in quartz , 2008 .

[5]  Norbert Mercier,et al.  Dose-rate conversion factors: update , 2011 .

[6]  N. G. Bougrov,et al.  Issues in the reconstruction of environmental doses on the basis of thermoluminescence measurements in the Techa riverside. , 1998, Health Physics.

[7]  M. Wrenn,et al.  Thermoluminescence measurements of gamma-ray doses attributable to fallout from the Nevada test site using building bricks as natural dosimeters. , 1994, Health physics.

[8]  A. Murray,et al.  Luminescence dating of quartz using an improved single aliquot regenerative-dose protocol , 2000 .

[9]  A. Wintle Thermal Quenching of Thermoluminescence in Quartz , 1975 .

[10]  A F Tsyb,et al.  THE APPLICATION OF RETROSPECTIVE LUMINESCENCE DOSIMETRY IN AREAS AFFECTED BY FALLOUT FROM THE SEMIPALATINSK NUCLEAR TEST SITE: AN EVALUATION OF POTENTIAL , 2004, Health physics.

[11]  L. Bøtter-Jensen,et al.  FIRST INTERNATIONAL INTERCOMPARISON OF LUMINESCENCE TECHNIQUES USING SAMPLES FROM THE TECHA RIVER VALLEY , 2002, Health physics.

[12]  V. Correcher,et al.  Absorbed dose evaluations in retrospective dosimetry : methodological developments using quartz , 2000 .

[13]  A. Murray,et al.  Blue Light Emitting Diodes for Optical Stimulation of Quartz in Retrospective Dosimetry and Dating , 1999 .

[14]  M. Martini,et al.  The trap parameters of electrons in intermediate energy levels in quartz , 2004 .

[15]  A. Murray,et al.  The relationship between quartz thermoluminescence, photo-transferred thermoluminescence, and optically stimulated luminescence , 1997 .

[16]  A. Murray,et al.  A review of quartz optically stimulated luminescence characteristics and their relevance in single-aliquot regeneration dating protocols , 2006 .

[17]  V. Correcher,et al.  COMPARISON OF RETROSPECTIVE LUMINESCENCE DOSIMETRY WITH COMPUTATIONAL MODELING IN TWO HIGHLY CONTAMINATED SETTLEMENTS DOWNWIND OF THE CHERNOBYL NPP , 2004, Health physics.

[18]  V. Khokhryakov,et al.  Studies on the Mayak nuclear workers: dosimetry , 2002, Radiation and environmental biophysics.

[19]  I. Bailiff The Development of Retrospective Luminescence Dosimetry for Dose Reconstruction in Areas Downwind of Chernobyl , 1999 .

[20]  H. Jungner,et al.  Intercomparison of luminescence measurements of bricks from Dolon' village: experimental methodology and results of European Study Group. , 2006, Journal of radiation research.

[21]  I. Bailiff,et al.  Dating bricks of the last two millennia from Newcastle upon Tyne: a preliminary study , 2000 .

[22]  Eizo Tajima,et al.  US-Japan Joint Reassessment of Atomic Bomb Radiation Dosimetry in Hiroshima and Nagasaki (Final Report) , 1987 .

[23]  J. F. Briesmeister MCNP-A General Monte Carlo N-Particle Transport Code , 1993 .

[24]  M. C. Pressello,et al.  Comparison of EPR occupational lifetime external dose assessments for Mayak nuclear workers and film badge dose data , 2006, Radiation and environmental biophysics.

[25]  K. F. Eckerman,et al.  External exposure to radionuclides in air, water, and soil , 1996 .

[26]  J. Prescott,et al.  Cosmic ray and gamma ray dosimetry for TL and ESR , 1988 .

[27]  M. Balonov,et al.  REPORT FROM THE TECHA RIVER DOSIMETRY REVIEW WORKSHOP HELD ON 8–10 DECEMBER 2003 AT THE STATE RESEARCH CENTRE INSTITUTE OF BIOPHYSICS, MOSCOW, RUSSIA , 2006, Health physics.

[28]  K. Andersson,et al.  An assessment of cumulative external doses from Chernobyl fallout for a forested area in Russia using the optically stimulated luminescence from quartz inclusions in bricks. , 2008, Journal of environmental radioactivity.

[29]  A. Murray,et al.  The single aliquot regenerative dose protocol: potential for improvements in reliability , 2003 .

[30]  M. I. Vorobiova,et al.  Verification of external exposure assessment for the upper Techa riverside by luminescence measurements and Monte Carlo photon transport modeling , 2003 .

[31]  J. Prescott,et al.  Cosmic ray contributions to dose rates for luminescence and ESR dating: Large depths and long-term time variations , 1994 .