Methodology for measuring health-state preferences--I: Measurement strategies.

Values play a critical part in decision making at both the individual and policy levels. Numerous methodologies for determining the preferences of individuals and groups have been proposed, but agreement has not been reached regarding their scientific adequacy and feasibility. This is the first of a four-part series of papers that analyzes and critiques the state-of-the-art in measuring preferences, particularly the measurement of health-state preferences. In this first paper we discuss the selection of relevant attributes to comprise the health-state descriptions, and the relative merits of three measurement strategies: holistic, explicitly decomposed, and statistically inferred decomposed. The functional measurement approach, a statistically inferred decomposed strategy, is recommended because it simultaneously validates the process by which judges combine attributes, the scale values they assign to health states, and the interval property of the scale.

[1]  P. Hoffman,et al.  Three models of clinical judgment. , 1968, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[2]  K. Arrow Social Choice and Individual Values , 1951 .

[3]  N. Anderson Integration theory and attitude change. , 1971 .

[4]  Robert L Kane,et al.  Values and long-term care , 1982 .

[5]  Edwin T. Cornelius,et al.  A comparison of holistic and decomposed judgment strategies in a performance rating simulation , 1982 .

[6]  G. A. Miller THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[7]  David L. Ford,et al.  A study of subjective evaluation models , 1969 .

[8]  G. Huber,et al.  A study of self‐explicated utility models , 1970 .

[9]  Michael H. Birnbaum,et al.  REPLY TO THE DEVIL'S ADVOCATES: DON'T CONFOUND MODEL TESTING AND MEASUREMENT , 1974 .

[10]  D. Cadman,et al.  Construction of social value or utility-based health indices: the usefulness of factorial experimental design plans. , 1986, Journal of chronic diseases.

[11]  D L Patrick,et al.  Toward an operational definition of health. , 1973, Journal of health and social behavior.

[12]  A. Dobson,et al.  Measuring the quality of life of cancer patients: a concise QL-index for use by physicians. , 1981, Journal of chronic diseases.

[13]  Michael H. Birnbaum,et al.  The devil rides again: Correlation as an index of fit. , 1973 .

[14]  G. Torrance,et al.  The utility of different health states as perceived by the general public. , 1978, Journal of chronic diseases.

[15]  P Tugwell,et al.  Preference for endpoint measures in clinical trials: results of structured workshops. , 1982, The Journal of rheumatology.

[16]  J E Ware,et al.  Effects of Physical and Mental Health on Health-State Preferences , 1982, Medical care.

[17]  George W. Torrance,et al.  Application of Multi-Attribute Utility Theory to Measure Social Preferences for Health States , 1982, Oper. Res..

[18]  H A Llewellyn-Thomas,et al.  The assessment of values in laryngeal cancer: reliability of measurement methods. , 1984, Journal of chronic diseases.

[19]  N. Anderson Chapter 8 – ALGEBRAIC MODELS IN PERCEPTION* , 1974 .

[20]  Gregory W. Fischer,et al.  UTILITY MODELS FOR MULTIPLE OBJECTIVE DECISIONS: DO THEY ACCURATELY REPRESENT HUMAN PREFERENCES?* , 1979 .

[21]  M. P. Friedman,et al.  HANDBOOK OF PERCEPTION , 1977 .

[22]  G W Torrance,et al.  Developing Multiattribute Health Indexes , 1984, Medical care.

[23]  R. Keeney A Group Preference Axiomatization with Cardinal Utility , 1976 .