How feasible is the attainment of community ambulation after stroke? A pilot randomized controlled trial to evaluate community-based physiotherapy in subacute stroke

Objective: This pilot randomized controlled trial evaluated an assistant-led, community-based intervention to improve community mobility and participation after stroke, and examined the potential for independent community ambulation in people with subacute stroke who present with moderate gait deficit. Design: A multicentre, pilot randomized controlled trial. Setting: Three hospitals and three community settings in New Zealand. Subjects: Thirty post-acute, home-dwelling stroke survivors were randomly allocated to receive intervention in the community (n = 14) or as hospital outpatients (n = 16) twice a week for seven weeks. Interventions: The community intervention involved practice of functional gait activities in community environments relevant to each participant. Hospital-based physiotherapy was based upon a Motor Relearning approach. Main measures: The primary outcome measure was gait speed (m/min). Secondary outcomes included endurance (six-minute walk time), Activities-specific Confidence Balance Scale, and the Subjective Index of Physical and Social Outcomes measured at baseline, post intervention and six months. Results: Large gains in gait speed were obtained for participants in both groups: community group mean (SD) 16 (16.1) m/min; physiotherapy group mean (SD) 15.9 (16.1) m/min, maintained at six months. There were no significant differences between groups for primary and secondary outcomes after treatment (P = 0.86 ANOVA) or at six months (P = 0.83 ANOVA). Only 11 participants reported independent community ambulation. Levels of social integration were low to moderate. Conclusions: A community-based gait recovery programme appears a practicable alternative to routine physiotherapy, however independent community ambulation is a challenging rehabilitation goal.

[1]  C. Richards,et al.  Responsiveness and predictability of gait speed and other disability measures in acute stroke. , 2001, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[2]  J. Eng,et al.  Relationship between ambulatory capacity and cardiorespiratory fitness in chronic stroke: influence of stroke-specific impairments. , 2005, Chest.

[3]  Roger P. Woods,et al.  Ankle dorsiflexion as an fMRI paradigm to assay motor control for walking during rehabilitation , 2004, NeuroImage.

[4]  R. Teasell,et al.  An Evidence-Based Review of Stroke Rehabilitation , 2003, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[5]  JoAnne K. Gronley,et al.  Classification of walking handicap in the stroke population. , 1995, Stroke.

[6]  Chao Qian,et al.  Population , 1940, State Rankings 2020: A Statistical View of America.

[7]  A. Forster,et al.  Physiotherapy for patients with mobility problems more than 1 year after stroke: a randomised controlled trial , 2002, The Lancet.

[8]  Roberta B. Shepherd,et al.  Stroke rehabilitation : guidelines for exercise and training to optimize motor skill , 2003 .

[9]  S. Brauer,et al.  Stroke Rehabilitation: Guidelines for Exercise and Training to Optimise Motor Skill , 2003 .

[10]  S. Studenski,et al.  Influence of stroke-related impairments on performance in 6-minute walk test. , 2002, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[11]  M. Watson Refining the ten-metre walking test for use with neurologically impaired people , 1992 .

[12]  M. Brandstater,et al.  A comparison of stroke rehabilitation practice and outcomes between New Zealand and United States facilities. , 2005, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[13]  L. Hale,et al.  Exploring the content of physiotherapeutic home-based stroke rehabilitation in New Zealand. , 2005, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[14]  Lynn Rochester,et al.  Measurement of Community Ambulation After Stroke: Current Status and Future Developments , 2005, Stroke.

[15]  T. Oberg,et al.  Basic gait parameters: reference data for normal subjects, 10-79 years of age. , 1993, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[16]  S J Jay,et al.  Reference equations for the six-minute walk in healthy adults. , 2000 .

[17]  C. Hocking,et al.  Shared responsibility for ongoing rehabilitation: a new approach to home-based therapy after stroke , 1999 .

[18]  B. Wright,et al.  Dependence and perceived difficulty in daily activities in community-living stroke survivors 2 years after stroke: a study of instrumental structures. , 1998, Stroke.

[19]  Francine Malouin,et al.  Chapter 9 – Assessment and training of locomotion after stroke: evolving concepts , 2005 .

[20]  Aftab E. Patla,et al.  Mobility in Complex Environments: Implications for Clinical Assessment and Rehabilitation , 2001 .

[21]  Luigi Ferrucci,et al.  Environmental Components of Mobility Disability in Community‐Living Older Persons , 2003, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[22]  Mb Lerner-Frankiel Functional community ambulation : what are your criteria? , 1990 .

[23]  S. Studenski,et al.  Randomized clinical trial of therapeutic exercise in subacute stroke. , 2003, Stroke.

[24]  Gunnargrimby,et al.  Dependence and Perceived Difficulty in Daily Activities in Community-Living Stroke Survivors 2 Years After Stroke , 1998 .

[25]  M. Folstein,et al.  Population-based norms for the Mini-Mental State Examination by age and educational level. , 1993, JAMA.

[26]  Julie Bernhardt,et al.  Balance and mobility outcomes for stroke patients: a comprehensive audit. , 1997, The Australian journal of physiotherapy.

[27]  L. Rochester,et al.  Community ambulation after stroke: how important and obtainable is it and what measures appear predictive? , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[28]  A. Myers,et al.  Discriminative and evaluative properties of the activities-specific balance confidence (ABC) scale. , 1998, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[29]  C. Richards,et al.  Task-related circuit training improves performance of locomotor tasks in chronic stroke: a randomized, controlled pilot trial. , 2000, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[30]  Aftab E. Patla,et al.  Dimensions of Mobility: Defining the Complexity and Difficulty Associated with Community Mobility , 1999 .

[31]  Lynn Rochester,et al.  The effect of environment and task on gait parameters after stroke: A randomized comparison of measurement conditions. , 2006, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[32]  R. Trigg,et al.  The validation of the Subjective Index of Physical and Social Outcome (SIPSO) , 2003, Clinical rehabilitation.

[33]  K. Asplund,et al.  Psychosocial Function and Life Satisfaction After Stroke , 1992, Stroke.

[34]  Bent Indredavik,et al.  Benefit of an Extended Stroke Unit Service With Early Supported Discharge: A Randomized, Controlled Trial , 2000, Stroke.