Information Use and New Product Outcomes: The Contingent Role of Strategy Type

Information is an important resource for firms to develop new products successfully, and firms must rely on their ability to use information effectively. This research builds on information processing and contingency theories to explore the effect of firm strategy type and the conceptual and instrumental use of information on new product outcomes. Firms operating in high-tech industries are faced with high levels of uncertainty caused by rapidly evolving technologies. Consequently, creating innovative and successful products becomes particularly challenging. Past research examining organizational use of information points to the presence of strategic contingencies that may impact the new product outcomes that accrue to a firm. A cross-sectional study was conducted to examine how the impact of information use on new product outcomes varies by strategy type. Using data from 150 software development firms based in a developing economy, the theoretical hypotheses proposed are tested. After controlling for environmental turbulence, the research results demonstrate that firms focusing on specific types of information use innovate successfully only when that information use is congruent with an appropriate strategic orientation. Specifically, the present study finds that prospector firms focusing on conceptual information use enhance both their new product performance and new product creativity outcomes, whereas analyzer firms enhance only their new product performance outcomes. A focus on instrumental information use has different effects for firms. Defender firms enhance both their new product performance and creativity outcomes only when focusing on instrumental information use. In contrast, prospector firms detract from their new product creativity outcomes, and analyzer firms reduce their new product performance outcomes when focusing on instrumental information use.

[1]  Christine Moorman,et al.  The Convergence of Planning and Execution: Improvisation in New Product Development , 1998 .

[2]  Paul C. Nutt,et al.  Tactics of Implementation , 1986 .

[3]  Bernard J. Jaworski,et al.  Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences , 1993 .

[4]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  The myopia of learning , 1993 .

[5]  R. Cooper,et al.  The Impact of Product Innovativeness on Performance , 1991 .

[6]  Harley Krohmer,et al.  Strategic Consensus and Performance: The Role of Strategy Type and Market-Related Dynamism , 1999 .

[7]  K. Weick.  The Collapse of Sensemaking in Organizations: The Mann Gulch Disaster , 1993 .

[8]  W. DeSarbo,et al.  Revisiting the Miles and Snow Strategic Framework: Uncovering Interrelationships between Strategic Types, Capabilities, Environmental Uncertainty, and Firm Performance , 2005 .

[9]  J. March,et al.  Information in Organizations as Signal and Symbol. , 1981 .

[10]  Dennis A. Gioia,et al.  Strategic Sensemaking and Organizational Performance: Linkages Among Scanning, Interpretation, Action, and Outcomes , 1993 .

[11]  J. M. Beyer,et al.  The Utilization Process: A Conceptual Framework and Synthesis of Empirical Findings. , 1982 .

[12]  G. Zaltman,et al.  Factors Affecting the Use of Market Research Information: A Path Analysis , 1982 .

[13]  Eric M. Olson,et al.  Strategy type and performance : The influence of sales force management , 2000 .

[14]  Gregory G. Dess,et al.  Clarifying the Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct and Linking It To Performance , 1996 .

[15]  Anil Menon,et al.  A Model of Marketing Knowledge use within Firms , 1992 .

[16]  R. Daft,et al.  Toward a Model of Organizations as Interpretation Systems , 1984 .

[17]  J. Dutton,et al.  Categorizing Strategic Issues: Links to Organizational Action , 1987 .

[18]  Kathryn Rudie Harrigan,et al.  Research Methodologies for Contingency Approaches to Business Strategy , 1983 .

[19]  David J. Miller,et al.  Relating Porter's Business Strategies to Environment and Structure: Analysis and Performance Implications , 1988 .

[20]  Andrew Vazsonyi.  Information Systems in Management Science---How to Do Away with Semantic Pollution in Information Systems , 1973 .

[21]  T. Devinney,et al.  NEW PRODUCT INNOVATIONS AND STOCK PRICE PERFORMANCE , 1992 .

[22]  Haiyang Li,et al.  Product Innovation Strategy and the Performance of New Technology Ventures in China , 2001 .

[23]  J. Child.  Strategic Choice in the Analysis of Action, Structure, Organizations and Environment: Retrospect and Prospect , 1997 .

[24]  David W. Gerbing,et al.  An Updated Paradigm for Scale Development Incorporating Unidimensionality and Its Assessment , 1988 .

[25]  M. Porter.  The Structure Within Industries and Companies' Performance , 1979 .

[26]  Liam Fahey,et al.  Toward understanding strategic issue diagnosis , 1983 .

[27]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments , 1986 .

[28]  Charlotte H. Mason,et al.  Collinearity, power, and interpretation of multiple regression analysis. , 1991 .

[29]  James W. Kolari,et al.  Marketing Strategy Implications of the Miles and Snow Strategic Typology , 1987 .

[30]  P. H. Friesen,et al.  Innovation in Conservative and Entrepreneurial Firms: Two Models of Strategic Momentum , 1982 .

[31]  David Miller.  Strategy Making and Structure: Analysis and Implications for Performance , 1987 .

[32]  Richard A. D'Aveni.  Strategic Supremacy through Disruption and Dominance , 1999 .

[33]  J. Ford,et al.  Size, Technology, Environment and the Structure of Organizations , 1977 .

[34]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[35]  H. Gatignon,et al.  Strategic Orientation of the Firm and New Product Performance , 1997 .

[36]  D. Leonard-Barton,et al.  Managerial influence in the implementation of new technology , 1988 .

[37]  Michael L. Tushman,et al.  Information Processing as an Integrating Concept in Organizational Design. , 1978 .

[38]  K. Hatten,et al.  Further evidence on the validity of the self typing paragraph approach: Miles and snow strategic , 1995 .

[39]  C. Moorman.  Organizational Market Information Processes: Cultural Antecedents and New Product Outcomes , 1995 .

[40]  William E. Souder,et al.  New Product Development Performance and the Interaction of Cross‐Functional Integration and Knowledge Management , 2005 .

[41]  Eric M. Olson,et al.  The Performance Implications of Fit among Business Strategy, Marketing Organization Structure, and Strategic Behavior , 2005 .

[42]  V. Krishnan,et al.  Technology Selection and Commitment in New Product Development: The Role of Uncertainty and Design Flexibility , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[43]  Jay R. Galbraith.  Organization Design: An Information Processing View , 1974 .

[44]  Mcdp Mathieu Weggeman,et al.  Determinants of the Level of Knowledge Application: A Knowledge‐Based and Information‐Processing Perspective* , 2005 .

[45]  J. Mentzer,et al.  The Effects of Strategy Type on the Market Orientation–Performance Relationship , 2000 .

[46]  Neil A. Morgan,et al.  A Configuration Theory Assessment of Marketing Organization Fit with Business Strategy and Its Relationship with Marketing Performance , 2003 .

[47]  Jay R. Galbraith.  Designing the Innovating Organization , 1982 .

[48]  Shaker A. Zahra,et al.  Research Evidence On The Miles-Snow Typology , 1990 .

[49]  K. Zhou,et al.  The Effects of Strategic Orientations on Technology- and Market-Based Breakthrough Innovations , 2005 .

[50]  P. Varadarajan,et al.  Strategic Adaptability and Firm Performance: A Market-Contingent Perspective , 1989 .

[51]  S. Shortell,et al.  Changing generic strategies: Likelihood, direction, and performance implications , 1989 .

[52]  C. C. Snow,et al.  Measuring Organizational Strategies: Some Theoretical and Methodological Problems , 1980 .

[53]  James W. Fredrickson,et al.  Effects of Decision Motive and Organizational Performance Level on Strategic Decision Processes , 1985 .

[54]  Robert W. Ruekert,et al.  The Organization of Marketing Activities: A Contingency Theory of Structure and Performance , 1985 .

[55]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[56]  Peter R. Dickson,et al.  Toward a General Theory of Competitive Rationality , 1992 .

[57]  R. Cooper,et al.  Determinants of Timeliness in Product Development , 1994 .

[58]  Ravi S. Achrol,et al.  Evolution of the Marketing Organization: New Forms for Turbulent Environments , 1991 .

[59]  Jeffrey G. Covin,et al.  Entrepreneurial strategy making and firm performance: tests of contingency and configurational models , 1997 .

[60]  L. Smircich,et al.  Strategic Management in an Enacted World , 1985 .

[61]  S. Shortell,et al.  Perceptual and archival measures of Miles and Snow's strategic types: a comprehensive assessment of reliability and validity. , 1990, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[62]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  Of strategies, deliberate and emergent , 1985, Strategic Management Journal.

[63]  C. Moorman,et al.  The Acquisition and Utilization of Information in New Product Alliances: A Strength-of-Ties Perspective , 2001 .