Direct Responses to People on the Screen

An experiment was conducted to extend the research evidence concerning direct responses to the realm of social interaction by replicating, in the context of television viewing, key findings and predictions concerning the use of interpersonal distance. In the study, 32 subjects watched excerpts of television news broadcasts that featured individual anchors speaking to the camera. Apparent interpersonal distance was manipulated via viewing distance (close = 10, 24, and 38 inches; normal = 30, 72, and 115 inches) and screen size (small = 10 inches measured diagonally; medium = 26 inches; large = 42 inches). Although results for the viewing distance manipulation failed to support predictions, as expected, subjects watching larger television screens reported more positive emotional responses to the people on the screen and the viewing environment and selected a viewing position that represented a smaller withdrawal from the encounter. Implications and suggestions for future research are discussed.

[1]  H. Hediger,et al.  Wild animals in captivity , 1950 .

[2]  Edward T. Hall,et al.  A System for the Notation of Proxemic Behavior1 , 1963 .

[3]  H. Garfinkel.  Studies of the Routine Grounds of Everyday Activities , 1964 .

[4]  M. Argyle,et al.  EYE-CONTACT, DISTANCE AND AFFILIATION. , 1965, Sociometry.

[5]  H. Rosenfeld.  Effect of an Approval-Seeking Induction on Interpersonal Proximity , 1965, Psychological reports.

[6]  Robert Sommer,et al.  Invasions of Personal Space , 1966 .

[7]  O. Watson,et al.  Quantitative Research in Proxemic Behavior1 , 1966 .

[8]  E. Hall,et al.  The Hidden Dimension , 1970 .

[9]  M. King.  Interpersonal relations in preschool children and average approach distance. , 1966, The Journal of genetic psychology.

[10]  R. Sommer,et al.  Seating arrangements and status. , 1967, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[11]  A. Mehrabian.  Relationship of attitude to seated posture, orientation, and distance. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  V. Pudovkin,et al.  Film Technique and Film Acting , 1968 .

[13]  M. Patterson,et al.  Spatial Factors in Social Interactions , 1968 .

[14]  K. Little,et al.  Cultural variations in social schemata. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  Albert Mehrabian,et al.  Encoding of attitude by a seated communicator via posture and position cues. , 1969 .

[16]  R. Kleck.  Physical Stigma and Task Oriented Interactions , 1969 .

[17]  Robert Sommer,et al.  Personal space : the behavioral basis of design , 1970 .

[18]  M. Patterson,et al.  Interpersonal distance and impression formation. , 1970, Journal of personality.

[19]  Albert Mehrabian,et al.  Models for affiliative and conformity behavior. , 1970 .

[20]  R. Veitch,et al.  Hot and crowded: influences of population density and temperature on interpersonal affective behavior. , 1971, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[21]  M. Patterson,et al.  Compensatory Reactions to Spatial Intrusion , 1971 .

[22]  J. Freedman,et al.  Crowding and human aggressiveness , 1972 .

[23]  E. Maccoby,et al.  The Psychology of Sex Differences , 1974 .

[24]  J. A. Cheyne,et al.  Affective concomitants of the invasion of shared space: behavioral, physiological, and verbal indicators. , 1974, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[25]  L. Kaufman.  Sight and mind : an introduction to visual perception , 1974 .

[26]  Donn Byrne,et al.  Too close for comfort : Sex differences in response to invasions of personal space , 1975 .

[27]  E. Ebbesen,et al.  Effects of a violation of personal space on escape and helping responses , 1975 .

[28]  Judee K. Burgoon,et al.  TOWARD A THEORY OF PERSONAL SPACE EXPECTATIONS AND THEIR VIOLATIONS , 1976 .

[29]  M. Patterson.  An arousal model of interpersonal intimacy. , 1976 .

[30]  R. D. Middlemist,et al.  Personal space invasions in the lavatory: suggestive evidence for arousal. , 1976, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[31]  A. Schiffenbauer,et al.  Physical distance and attraction: An intensification effect , 1976 .

[32]  I. Firestone,et al.  Reconciling verbal and nonverbal models of dyadic communication , 1977 .

[33]  A. Imada,et al.  Influence of nonverbal communication and rater proximity on impressions and decisions in simulated employment interviews. , 1977 .

[34]  George Thomas,et al.  Reactions to physical closeness. , 1977 .

[35]  R. Barthes,et al.  Image-Music-Text , 1977 .

[36]  Attributional Consequences of Personal Space Invasions , 1978 .

[37]  R. Baron.  Invasions of personal space and helping: Mediating effects of invader's apparent need ☆ , 1978 .

[38]  J. Burgoon.  A Communication Model of Personal Space Violations: Explication and an Initial Test. , 1978 .

[39]  Donna E. Thompson,et al.  Interpersonal distance preferences , 1979 .

[40]  D. Stacks,et al.  A communicative model of violations of distancing expectations , 1979 .

[41]  Robert J. Smith,et al.  Affective and cognitive mediators of reactions to spatial invasions , 1979 .

[42]  M. E. Shaw,et al.  Affective reactions to interpersonal distances by friends and strangers , 1980 .

[43]  Hideo Kusaka,et al.  Psychophysical Analysis of the “Sensation of Reality” Induced by a Visual Wide-Field Display , 1980 .

[44]  D. Stacks,et al.  The role of nonverbal behaviors as distractors in resistance to persuasion in interpersonal contexts , 1981 .

[45]  John O. Greene,et al.  A discrepancy‐arousal explanation of mutual influence in expressive behavior for adult and infant‐adult interaction 1 , 1982 .

[46]  M. Patterson.  A sequential functional model of nonverbal exchange. , 1982 .

[47]  Dafna Lemish,et al.  The rules of viewing television in public places , 1982 .

[48]  M. Patterson,et al.  Behavioral and cognitive consequences of reciprocal versus compensatory responses to preinteraction expectancies. , 1982 .

[49]  J. Burgoon,et al.  Three field experiments on the effects of violations of conversational distance , 1982 .

[50]  Gary Gumpert,et al.  Inter/Media: Interpersonal Communication in a Media World , 1983 .

[51]  J. Cappella,et al.  The effects of distance and individual differences in arousability on nonverbal involvement: A test of discrepancy-arousal theory , 1984 .

[52]  Jerome Kagan,et al.  Psychology: An Introduction , 1984 .

[53]  David Bordwell.  Narration in the Fiction Film , 1985 .

[54]  R. Goldstein,et al.  Attention to television: intrastimulus effects of movement and scene changes on alpha variation over time. , 1985, The International journal of neuroscience.

[55]  Daniel R. Anderson,et al.  Television Viewing at Home: Distances and Visual Angles of Children and Adults , 1985, Human factors.

[56]  L. Solomon,et al.  Helping Behavior as a Function of Personal Space Invasion , 1986 .

[57]  Jennings Bryant,et al.  Perspectives on Media Effects , 1986 .

[58]  Byron Reeves,et al.  WATCHING TELEVISION , 1986 .

[59]  R. Kraft,et al.  The influence of camera angle on comprehension and retention of pictorial events , 1987, Memory & cognition.

[60]  Renee Hobbs,et al.  How First-Time Viewers Comprehend Editing Conventions , 1988 .

[61]  A. Rüstemli,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF PERSONAL-SPACE INVASION ON IMPRESSIONS AND DECISIONS , 1988 .

[62]  Jerold L. Hale,et al.  Nonverbal expectancy violations: Model elaboration and application to immediacy behaviors , 1988 .

[63]  André Lafrance.  Les pouvoirs individuels dans les communications organisationnelles , 1990 .

[64]  M. J. Norušis,et al.  Spss Advanced Statistics Student Guide , 1990 .

[65]  Judee K. Burgoon,et al.  Nonverbal Expectancies and the Evaluative Consequences of Violations , 1990 .

[66]  G. Uetz,et al.  Video image recognition by the jumping spider, Maevia inclemens (Araneae: Salticidae) , 1990, Animal Behaviour.

[67]  John H. Flavell,et al.  Do young children think of television images as pictures or real objects , 1990 .

[68]  C. Nass,et al.  Combining, Distinguishing, and Generating Theories in Communication , 1991 .

[69]  P. Messaris.  Visual “Literacy”: A Theoretical Synthesis , 1993 .

[70]  Paul Messaris,et al.  Visual ""literacy"": Image, Mind, And Reality , 1994 .

[71]  Joseph D. Anderson.  The reality of illusion : an ecological approach to cognitive film theory , 1996 .