Simultaneously recorded retinal and cortical responses to patterned stimuli.

The method of stimulus alternation was used to record simultaneously electroretinograms (ERGs) and visually evoked cortical potentials (VECPs) to stimuli of differing luminance and pattern. Stimuli consisted of checked and striped patterns with a variety of spatial frequencies. ERGs of approximately equal amplitudes were elicited by patterns of the same spatial frequency regardless of pattern. ERG amplitude decreased monotonically with increasing spatial frequencies of the patterns. Simultaneously recorded VECPs were consistently larger for checked patterns than for striped patterns of equal spatial frequency. The largest VECPs were seen with checked patterns having spatial frequencies of approximately 1 cycle/deg of visual angle: frequencies both higher and lower than this value produced smaller responses.

[1]  A. S. Patel Spatial resolution by the human visual system. The effect of mean retinal illuminance. , 1966, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[2]  J. Armington Adaptational changes in the human electroretinogram and occipital response. , 1964, Vision research.

[3]  C. Enroth-Cugell,et al.  The contrast sensitivity of retinal ganglion cells of the cat , 1966, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  J. Armington Electrical responses of the light-adapted eye. , 1953, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[5]  M. Davidson Perturbation approach to spatial brightness interaction in human vision. , 1968, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[6]  D. G. Green The contrast sensitivity of the colour mechanisms of the human eye , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[7]  Donald I. Tepas,et al.  Properties of evoked visual potentials , 1962 .

[8]  G. Arden,et al.  Some properties of components of the cat electroretinogram revealed by local recording under oil , 1965, The Journal of physiology.

[9]  Harter Mr,et al.  Effects of contour sharpness and check-size on visually evoked cortical potentials. , 1968 .

[10]  W. Noell The effect of iodoacetate on the vertebrate retina. , 1951, Journal of cellular and comparative physiology.

[11]  Pupil entry and the human electroretinogram. , 1967, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[12]  E R John,et al.  Effects of Visual Form on the Evoked Response , 1967, Science.

[13]  W. Cobb,et al.  Cerebral Potentials evoked by Pattern Reversal and their Suppression in Visual Rivalry , 1967, Nature.

[14]  F. Campbell,et al.  Optical quality of the human eye , 1966, The Journal of physiology.

[15]  R. Spehlmann The averaged electrical responses to diffuse and to patterned light in the human. , 1965, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[16]  L. Riggs Continuous and Reproducible Records of the Electrical Activity of the Human Retina.∗ , 1941 .

[17]  T. Tomita,et al.  Electrical activity in the vertebrate retina. , 1963, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[18]  E. Marg The effect of stimulus size and retinal illuminance on the human electroretinogram. , 1953, American journal of optometry and archives of American Academy of Optometry.

[19]  J C Armington,et al.  The electroretinogram, the visual evoked potential, and the area-luminance relation. , 1968, Vision research.

[20]  M. Murakami,et al.  The early and late receptor potentials of monkey cones and rods. , 1965, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[21]  K. Brown,et al.  The electroretinogram: its components and their origins. , 1968, UCLA forum in medical sciences.

[22]  A. Schick,et al.  Stimulus alternation and low level response. , 1970, Vision research.

[23]  J. Dowling,et al.  Intracellular responses of the Müller (glial) cells of mudpuppy retina: their relation to b-wave of the electroretinogram. , 1970, Journal of neurophysiology.