X+: a comprehensive computationally accelerated structure analysis tool for solution X‐ray scattering from supramolecular self‐assemblies

X+ is a user-friendly multi-core accelerated program that fully analyses solution X-ray scattering radially integrated images. This software is particularly useful for analysing supramolecular self-assemblies, often found in biology, and for reconstructing the scattering signal in its entirety. The program enables various ways of subtracting background noise. The user selects a geometric model and defines as many layers of that shape as needed. The thickness and electron density of each layer are the fitting parameters. An initial guess is input by the user and the program calculates the form-factor parameters that best fit the data. The polydispersity of one size parameter at a time can be taken into account. The program can then address the assembly of those shapes into different lattice symmetries. This is accounted for by fitting the parameters of the structure factor, using various peak line shapes. The models of the program and selected features are presented. Among them are the model-fitting procedure, which includes both absolute and relative constraints, data smoothing, signal decomposition for separation of form and structure factors, goodness-of-fit verification procedures, error estimation, and automatic feature recognition in the data, such as correlation peaks and baseline. The program's intuitive graphical user interface runs on Windows PCs. Using X+, the exact structure of a microtubule in a crowded environment, and the structure, domain size, and elastic and interaction parameters of lipid bilayers, were obtained.

[1]  E. Nogales,et al.  Low resolution structure of microtubules in solution. Synchrotron X-ray scattering and electron microscopy of taxol-induced microtubules assembled from purified tubulin in comparison with glycerol and MAP-induced microtubules. , 1992, Journal of molecular biology.

[2]  W. Bras,et al.  Scatter: software for the analysis of nano‐ and mesoscale small‐angle scattering , 2010 .

[3]  Azriel Rosenfeld,et al.  Computer Vision , 1988, Adv. Comput..

[4]  Smith,et al.  Steric interactions in a model multimembrane system: A synchrotron x-ray study. , 1986, Physical review letters.

[5]  K. Ewert,et al.  Radial compression of microtubules and the mechanism of action of taxol and associated proteins. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[6]  D. Marquardt.  An Algorithm for Least-Squares Estimation of Nonlinear Parameters , 1963 .

[7]  Arnold Neumaier,et al.  Introduction to Numerical Analysis , 2001 .

[8]  J. Als-Nielsen,et al.  Elements of Modern X-ray Physics , 2001 .

[9]  Kenneth Levenberg.  A METHOD FOR THE SOLUTION OF CERTAIN NON – LINEAR PROBLEMS IN LEAST SQUARES , 1944 .

[10]  B. Warren.  X-Ray Diffraction in Random Layer Lattices , 1941 .

[11]  M. Teubner,et al.  Origin of the scattering peak in microemulsions , 1987 .

[12]  K. Ewert,et al.  Synchrotron X-ray diffraction study of microtubules buckling and bundling under osmotic stress: a probe of interprotofilament interactions. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[13]  Suter,et al.  Theory of the structure factor of lipid bilayers. , 1994, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[14]  Youli Li,et al.  Microtubule protofilament number is modulated in a stepwise fashion by the charge density of an enveloping layer. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[15]  Tal Ben-Nun,et al.  Solution X-ray scattering form factors of supramolecular self-assembled structures. , 2010, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[16]  N. Metropolis,et al.  The Monte Carlo method. , 1949 .

[17]  Dmitri I. Svergun,et al.  PRIMUS: a Windows PC-based system for small-angle scattering data analysis , 2003 .

[18]  Gene H. Golub,et al.  Singular value decomposition and least squares solutions , 1970, Milestones in Matrix Computation.

[19]  G. G. Stokes.  "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[20]  Myung Chul Choi,et al.  Human microtubule-associated-protein tau regulates the number of protofilaments in microtubules: a synchrotron x-ray scattering study. , 2009, Biophysical journal.

[21]  Youli Li,et al.  Cationic liposome-microtubule complexes: pathways to the formation of two-state lipid-protein nanotubes with open or closed ends. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  T. Salditt,et al.  Self-assembled DNA–cationic-lipid complexes: Two-dimensional smectic ordering, correlations, and interactions , 1998 .

[23]  J. Bordas,et al.  Solution structure of GDP-tubulin double rings to 3 nm resolution and comparison with microtubules. , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.

[24]  L. J. Lis,et al.  Binding of divalent cations of dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine bilayers and its effect on bilayer interaction. , 1981, Biochemistry.

[25]  Yiming Li,et al.  Supramolecular assembly of biological molecules purified from bovine nerve cells: from microtubule bundles and necklaces to neurofilament networks , 2005 .

[26]  A. V. Semenyuk,et al.  GNOM – a program package for small-angle scattering data processing , 1991 .

[27]  D. Needleman,et al.  Higher-order assembly of microtubules by counterions: from hexagonal bundles to living necklaces. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  J. M. de Pereda,et al.  Solution structure of Taxotere-induced microtubules to 3-nm resolution. The change in protofilament number is linked to the binding of the taxol side chain. , 1994, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[29]  R. Penrose.  A Generalized inverse for matrices , 1955 .