Where to find the mind: identifying the scale of cognitive dynamics

There are ongoing divisions in the learning sciences between perspectives that treat cognition as occurring within individual minds and those that treat it as irreducibly distributed or situated in material and social contexts. We contend that accounts of individual minds as complex systems are theoretically continuous with distributed and situated cognition. On this view, the difference is a matter of the scale of the dynamics of interest, and the choice of scale can be informed by data. In this paper, we propose heuristics for empirically determining the scale of the relevant cognitive dynamics. We illustrate these heuristics in two contrasting cases, one in which the evidence supports attributing cognition to a group of students and one in which the evidence supports attributing cognition to an individual.

[1]  Rachel E. Scherr,et al.  The Dynamics of Students' Behaviors and Reasoning during Collaborative Physics Tutorial Sessions , 2007, 0803.0323.

[2]  J. Greeno.  On Claims That Answer the Wrong Questions , 1997 .

[3]  Andrea A. diSessa,et al.  Knowledge in pieces : An evolving framework for understanding knowing and learning , 1988 .

[4]  A. Avramides.  Studies in the Way of Words , 1992 .

[5]  E. Goffman.  Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience , 1974 .

[6]  G. Reeke.  Marvin Minsky, The Society of Mind , 1991, Artif. Intell..

[7]  Deborah Tannen,et al.  Framing in Discourse , 1993 .

[8]  G. Bateson.  A theory of play and fantasy. , 1955 .

[9]  David Hammer,et al.  Student Behavior and Epistemological Framing: Examples from Collaborative Active-Learning Activities in Physics , 2007, ICLS.

[10]  Andrew Elby,et al.  Resources , framing , and transfer , 2004 .

[11]  D. Lewkowicz,et al.  A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. , 2007, Journal of cognitive neuroscience.

[12]  P. Cobb.  Where Is the Mind? Constructivist and Sociocultural Perspectives on Mathematical Development , 1994 .

[13]  Edwin Hutchins,et al.  How a Cockpit Remembers Its Speeds , 1995, Cogn. Sci..

[14]  Manuel López-Ibáñez,et al.  Ant colony optimization , 2010, GECCO '10.

[15]  D. Over,et al.  Studies in the Way of Words. , 1989 .

[16]  S. Strogatz,et al.  Synchronization of pulse-coupled biological oscillators , 1990 .

[17]  Marco Dorigo.  Ant colony optimization , 2004, Scholarpedia.

[18]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  Situative Versus Cognitive Perspectives: Form Versus Substance , 1997 .

[19]  Brian W. Frank,et al.  Accounting for variability in student responses to motion questions , 2008 .

[20]  A. Sfard.  On Two Metaphors for Learning and the Dangers of Choosing Just One , 1998 .

[21]  Riccardo Poli,et al.  Particle swarm optimization , 1995, Swarm Intelligence.