Can foot anthropometric measurements predict dynamic plantar surface contact area?

BackgroundPrevious studies have suggested that increased plantar surface area, associated with pes planus, is a risk factor for the development of lower extremity overuse injuries. The intent of this study was to determine if a single or combination of foot anthropometric measures could be used to predict plantar surface area.MethodsSix foot measurements were collected on 155 subjects (97 females, 58 males, mean age 24.5 ± 3.5 years). The measurements as well as one ratio were entered into a stepwise regression analysis to determine the optimal set of measurements associated with total plantar contact area either including or excluding the toe region. The predicted values were used to calculate plantar surface area and were compared to the actual values obtained dynamically using a pressure sensor platform.ResultsA three variable model was found to describe the relationship between the foot measures/ratio and total plantar contact area (R2 = 0.77, p < 0.0001)). A three variable model was also found to describe the relationship between the foot measures/ratio and plantar contact area minus the toe region (R2 = 0.76, p < 0.0001).ConclusionThe results of this study indicate that the clinician can use a combination of simple, reliable, and time efficient foot anthropometric measurements to explain over 75% of the plantar surface contact area, either including or excluding the toe region.

[1]  W. Chu,et al.  The use of arch index to characterize arch height: a digital image processing approach , 1995, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  S. Urry,et al.  Arch indexes from ink footprints and pressure platforms are different , 2005 .

[3]  K. Kaufman,et al.  The Effect of Foot Structure and Range of Motion on Musculoskeletal Overuse Injuries , 1999, The American journal of sports medicine.

[4]  A. Mannion,et al.  Reliability and minimal detectable change for the figure-of-eight-20 method of, measurement of ankle edema. , 2007, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[5]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[6]  Siri Tessem,et al.  Weight distribution in standing and sitting positions, and weight transfer during reaching tasks, in seated stroke subjects and healthy subjects. , 2007, Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy.

[7]  Jonathan C. Levy,et al.  Incidence of Foot and Ankle Injuries in West Point Cadets with Pes Planus Compared to the General Cadet Population , 2006, Foot & ankle international.

[8]  Bill Vicenzino,et al.  Reliability and normative values for the foot mobility magnitude: a composite measure of vertical and medial-lateral mobility of the midfoot , 2009, Journal of foot and ankle research.

[9]  M. Cornwall,et al.  Use of plantar contact area to predict medial longitudinal arch height during walking. , 2006, Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association.

[10]  J. Michelson,et al.  The Injury Risk Associated with Pes Planus in Athletes , 2002, Foot & ankle international.

[11]  Bill Vicenzino,et al.  Effect of using truncated versus total foot length to calculate the arch height ratio. , 2008, Foot.

[12]  J. M. Rothstein.  Measurement in physical therapy , 1985 .

[13]  Benno M. Nigg,et al.  Footprint Parameters as a Measure of Arch Height , 1992, Foot & ankle.

[14]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[15]  T Y Shiang,et al.  Evaluating different footprint parameters as a predictor of arch height. , 1998, IEEE engineering in medicine and biology magazine : the quarterly magazine of the Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society.