Late Life Function and Disability Instrument: II. Development and evaluation of the function component.

BACKGROUND Self-reported capability in physical functioning has long been considered an important focus of research for older persons. Current measures have been criticized, however, for conceptual confusion, lack of sensitivity to change, poor reproducibility, and inability to capture a wide range of upper and lower extremity functioning. METHODS Using Nagi's disablement model, we wrote physical functioning questionnaire items that assessed difficulty in 48 common daily tasks. We constructed the instrument using factor analysis and Rasch analytic techniques and evaluated its validity and test-retest reliability with 150 ethnically and racially diverse adults aged 60 years and older who had a range of functional limitations. RESULTS Our analyses resulted in a 32-item function component with three dimensions--upper extremity, basic lower extremity, and advanced lower extremity functions. Expected differences in summary scores of known-functional limitation groups support its validity. Test-retest stability over a 1- to 3-week period was extremely high (intraclass correlation coefficients =.91 to.98). CONCLUSIONS The Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument has potential to assess activity concepts related to upper and lower extremity functioning across a wide variety of daily physical tasks and individual levels of physical functioning.

[1]  C. Winograd,et al.  Identifying Hospitalized Older Patients At Varying Risk For Physical Performance Decline: A New Approach , 1997, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[2]  S. Z. Nagi Some conceptual issues in disability and rehabilitation , 1965 .

[3]  C. Sherbourne,et al.  The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) , 1992 .

[4]  G. Masters,et al.  Rating scale analysis , 1982 .

[5]  J. E. Brazier,et al.  Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care. , 1992, BMJ.

[6]  U. Sonn,et al.  The cumulative structure of personal and instrumental ADL. A study of elderly people in a health service district. , 2020, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[7]  C. Gottfries,et al.  Activities of daily living ratings of elderly people using Katz' ADL Index and the GBS-M scale. , 1995, Scandinavian journal of caring sciences.

[8]  C. Granger,et al.  Inter-rater agreement and stability of functional assessment in the community-based elderly. , 1994, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[9]  R. Lyons,et al.  Evidence for the validity of the Short-form 36 Questionnaire (SF-36) in an elderly population. , 1994, Age and ageing.

[10]  D Kromhout,et al.  Measuring functional status: cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between performance and self-report (Zutphen Elderly Study 1990-1993). , 1996, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[11]  L. Kazis,et al.  Comparing generic and disease-specific measures of physical and role functioning: results from the Veterans Health Study. , 1998, Medical care.

[12]  N Slimani,et al.  Estimation of reproducibility and relative validity of the questions included in the EPIC Physical Activity Questionnaire. , 1997, International journal of epidemiology.

[13]  L. Ferrucci,et al.  Self‐Report of Difficulty in Performing Functional Activities Identifies a Broad Range of Disability in Old Age , 1996, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[14]  Christianna S. Williams,et al.  Assessing Risk for the Onset of Functional Dependence Among Older Adults: The Role of Physical Performance , 1995, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[15]  T. Suurmeijer,et al.  The development of a hierarchical polychotomous ADL-IADL scale for noninstitutionalized elders. , 1990, The Gerontologist.

[16]  B Miller,et al.  A comparative analysis of ADL questions in surveys of older people. , 1997, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[17]  J. Ware,et al.  The Meaning of Health: Understanding Functional Limitations , 1977, Medical care.

[18]  W. Strawbridge,et al.  Factors Associated with Change in Physical Functioning in the Elderly , 1993 .

[19]  Alan M Jette,et al.  Late life function and disability instrument: I. Development and evaluation of the disability component. , 2002, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[20]  E. Jessop,et al.  A comparison of measures of disability and health status in people with physical disabilities undergoing vocational rehabilitation. , 1996, Journal of public health medicine.

[21]  W. Spector,et al.  The hierarchical relationship between activities of daily living and instrumental activities of daily living. , 1987, Journal of chronic diseases.

[22]  M. Ferrer,et al.  Are results of the SF-36 health survey and the Nottingham Health Profile similar? A comparison in COPD patients. Quality of Life in COPD Study Group. , 1997, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[23]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[24]  A M Jette,et al.  The Framingham Disability Study: II. Physical disability among the aging. , 1981, American journal of public health.

[25]  D. Reuben,et al.  What's Wrong With ADLs? , 1995, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[26]  I McDowell,et al.  Multidimensionality in instrumental and basic activities of daily living. , 1998, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[27]  Svend Kreiner,et al.  Functional ability scales for the elderly: A validation study , 1996 .

[28]  F. Sturmans,et al.  A scale for the functional status of the elderly living at home. , 1991, Journal of advanced nursing.

[29]  S. Kreiner,et al.  Construct validation and the Rasch model , 1993, Scandinavian journal of social medicine.

[30]  H Rodgers,et al.  Is the SF-36 suitable for assessing health status of older stroke patients? , 1998, Age and ageing.

[31]  B. Linn,et al.  Objective and self-assessed health in the old and very old. , 1980, Social science & medicine. Medical psychology & medical sociology.

[32]  R. Hays,et al.  Hierarchical Measures of Physical Function in Ambulatory Geriatrics , 1990, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.