A perforated CMOS microchip for immobilization and activity monitoring of electrogenic cells

CMOS-based microelectrode systems offer decisive advantages over conventional micro-electrode arrays, which include the possibility to perform on-chip signal conditioning or to efficiently use larger numbers of electrodes to obtain statistically relevant data, e.g., in pharmacological drug screening. A larger number of electrodes can only be realized with the help of on-chip multiplexing and readout schemes, which require integrated electronics. Another fundamental issue in performing high-fidelity recordings from electrogenic cells is a good electrical coupling between the cells and the microelectrodes, in particular, since the recorded extracellular signals are in the range of only 10–1000 µV. In this paper we present the first CMOS microelectrode system with integrated micromechanical cell-placement features fabricated in a commercial CMOS process with subsequent post-CMOS bulk micromachining. This new microdevice aims at enabling the precise placement of single cells in the center of the electrodes to ensure an efficient use of the available electrodes, even for low-density cell cultures. Small through-chip holes have been generated at the metal-electrode sites by using a combination of bulk micromachining and reactive-ion etching. These holes act as orifices so that cell immobilization can be achieved by means of pneumatic anchoring. The chip additionally hosts integrated circuitry, i.e., multiplexers to select the respective readout electrodes, an amplifier with selectable gain (2×, 10×, 100×), and a high-pass filter (100 Hz cut-off). In this paper we show that electrical signals from most of the electrodes can be recorded, even in low-density cultures of neonatal rat cardiomyocytes, by using perforated metal electrodes and by applying a small underpressure from the backside of the chip. The measurements evidenced that, in most cases, about 90% of the electrodes were covered with single cells, approximately 4% were covered with more than one cell due to clustering and approximately 6% were not covered with any cell, mostly as a consequence of orifice clogging. After 4 days of culturing, the cells were still in place on the electrodes so that the cell electrical activity could be measured using the on-chip circuitry. Measured signal amplitudes were in the range of 500–700 µV, while the input-referred noise of the readout was below 15 µVrms (100 Hz–4 kHz bandwidth). We report on the development and fabrication of this new cell-biological tool and present first results collected during the characterization and evaluation of the chip. The recordings of electrical potentials of neonatal rat cardiomyocytes after several days in vitro, which, on the one hand, were conventionally cultured (no pneumatic anchoring) and, on the other hand, were anchored and immobilized, will be detailed.

[1]  Jason B Shear,et al.  Guiding neuronal development with in situ microfabrication. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  B D DeBusschere,et al.  Portable cell-based biosensor system using integrated CMOS cell-cartridges. , 2001, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[3]  P. Connolly,et al.  Advantages of using microfabricated extracellular electrodes for in vitro neuronal recording , 1995, Journal of neuroscience research.

[4]  H. Beutel,et al.  Fast and precise positioning of single cells on planar electrode substrates , 1999, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[5]  B. Eversmann,et al.  A 128 × 128 CMOS bio-sensor array for extracellular recording of neural activity , 2003 .

[6]  O. Guenat,et al.  High-density electrode array for imaging in vitro electrophysiological activity. , 2005, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[7]  Jan P. Kucera,et al.  Photolithographically defined deposition of attachment factors as a versatile method for patterning the growth of different cell types in culture , 2003, Pflügers Archiv.

[8]  P. Fromherz,et al.  Silicon Chip Interfaced with a Geometrically Defined Net of Snail Neurons , 2005 .

[9]  G. Loeb,et al.  A miniature microelectrode array to monitor the bioelectric activity of cultured cells. , 1972, Experimental cell research.

[10]  G. Gross,et al.  The use of neuronal networks on multielectrode arrays as biosensors. , 1995, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[11]  Enrico Marani,et al.  Dielectrophoretic trapping of dissociated fetal cortical rat neurons , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  Laurent Giovangrandi,et al.  Sensitivity of cell-based biosensors to environmental variables. , 2005, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[13]  Andreas Hierlemann,et al.  Impedance characterization and modeling of electrodes for biomedical applications , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  Sawyer B. Fuller,et al.  A fast flexible ink-jet printing method for patterning dissociated neurons in culture , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[15]  A. Hierlemann,et al.  CMOS microelectrode array for the monitoring of electrogenic cells. , 2004, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[16]  Microstructures for studies of cultured neural networks , 2006, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[17]  S. Thanos,et al.  Ink-jet printing for micropattern generation of laminin for neuronal adhesion , 2003, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[18]  D Kleinfeld,et al.  Controlled outgrowth of dissociated neurons on patterned substrates , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[19]  Wim L. C. Rutten,et al.  Adhesion and patterning of cortical neurons on polyethylenimine- and fluorocarbon-coated surfaces , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[20]  A. Harsch,et al.  Odor, drug and toxin analysis with neuronal networks in vitro: extracellular array recording of network responses. , 1997, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[21]  Gregory T. A. Kovacs,et al.  Electronic sensors with living cellular components , 2003, Proc. IEEE.

[22]  M Krause,et al.  Ordered networks of rat hippocampal neurons attached to silicon oxide surfaces , 2000, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[23]  Biomimetic self-assembled surfaces for highly selective guided cell growth on cell-based biosensors , 2004 .

[24]  Marcus Textor,et al.  A novel generic platform for chemical patterning of surfaces , 2004 .

[25]  J. Pine Recording action potentials from cultured neurons with extracellular microcircuit electrodes , 1980, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[26]  M. Stepp,et al.  Integrins as receptors for laminins , 2000, Microscopy research and technique.

[28]  Y. Jimbo,et al.  Electrical stimulation and recording from cultured neurons using a planar electrode array , 1992 .

[29]  Ellis Meng,et al.  PARYLENE TECHNOLOGY FOR MECHANICALLY ROBUST NEURO- CAGES , 2003 .

[30]  E. Ehler,et al.  Different domains of the M-band protein myomesin are involved in myosin binding and M-band targeting. , 1999, Molecular biology of the cell.

[31]  J. Voldman,et al.  Dielectrophoretic registration of living cells to a microelectrode array. , 2004, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[32]  Louis Tiefenauer,et al.  Photolithographic generation of protein micropatterns for neuron culture applications. , 2002, Biomaterials.

[33]  G. Gross Simultaneous Single Unit Recording in vitro with a Photoetched Laser Deinsulated Gold Multimicroelectrode Surface , 1979, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[34]  Claire Wyart,et al.  Constrained synaptic connectivity in functional mammalian neuronal networks grown on patterned surfaces , 2002, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[35]  N. Manaresi,et al.  A CMOS chip for individual cell manipulation and detection , 2003, 2003 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference, 2003. Digest of Technical Papers. ISSCC..

[36]  P. Fromherz,et al.  Noninvasive neuroelectronic interfacing with synaptically connected snail neurons immobilized on a semiconductor chip , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  Peter Fromherz,et al.  Polyester Microstructures for Topographical Control of Outgrowth and Synapse Formation of Snail Neurons , 2002 .

[38]  W.L.C. Rutten,et al.  Neuro-electronic interfacing with multielectrode arrays , 1999, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[39]  A. Hierlemann,et al.  High-throughput cell-based screening system with on-chip dilution stage , 2006, 2006 International Conference on Microtechnologies in Medicine and Biology.

[40]  D E Ingber,et al.  Using microcontact printing to pattern the attachment of mammalian cells to self-assembled monolayers of alkanethiolates on transparent films of gold and silver. , 1997, Experimental cell research.

[41]  D. Schmitt-Landsiedel,et al.  A 128 /spl times/ 128 CMOS bio-sensor array for extracellular recording of neural activity , 2003, 2003 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference, 2003. Digest of Technical Papers. ISSCC..

[42]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Patterning proteins and cells using soft lithography. , 1999, Biomaterials.