Abstract The global exploration roadmap suggests, among other ambitious future space programmes, a possible manned outpost in lunar vicinity, to support surface operations and further astronaut training for longer and deeper space missions and transfers. In particular, a Lagrangian point orbit location - in the Earth- Moon system - is suggested for a manned cis-lunar infrastructure; proposal which opens an interesting field of study from the astrodynamics perspective. Literature offers a wide set of scientific research done on orbital dynamics under the Three-Body Problem modelling approach, while less of it includes the attitude dynamics modelling as well. However, whenever a large space structure (ISS-like) is considered, not only the coupled orbit-attitude dynamics should be modelled to run more accurate analyses, but the structural flexibility should be included too. The paper, starting from the well-known Circular Restricted Three-Body Problem formulation, presents some preliminary results obtained by adding a coupled orbit-attitude dynamical model and the effects due to the large structure flexibility. In addition, the most relevant perturbing phenomena, such as the Solar Radiation Pressure (SRP) and the fourth-body (Sun) gravity, are included in the model as well. A multi-body approach has been preferred to represent possible configurations of the large cis-lunar infrastructure: interconnected simple structural elements - such as beams, rods or lumped masses linked by springs - build up the space segment. To better investigate the relevance of the flexibility effects, the lumped parameters approach is compared with a distributed parameters semi-analytical technique. A sensitivity analysis of system dynamics, with respect to different configurations and mechanical properties of the extended structure, is also presented, in order to highlight drivers for the lunar outpost design. Furthermore, a case study for a large and flexible space structure in Halo orbits around one of the Earth-Moon collinear Lagrangian points, L1 or L2, is discussed to point out some relevant outcomes for the potential implementation of such a mission.
[1]
Arun K. Misra,et al.
Attitude Dynamics of Rigid Bodies in the Vicinity of the Lagrangian Points
,
2008
.
[2]
R. Scott,et al.
Dynamics of flexible beams undergoing overall motions
,
1995
.
[3]
Amanda J. Knutson,et al.
Attitude Responses in Coupled Orbit-Attitude Dynamical Model in Earth–Moon Lyapunov Orbits
,
2015
.
[4]
P. Gurfil,et al.
Analysis of gravity-gradient-perturbed rotational dynamics at the collinear lagrange points
,
2007
.
[5]
T. Kane,et al.
Attitude stability of a symmetric satellite at the equilibrium points in the restricted three-body problem
,
1971
.
[6]
K. Howell,et al.
Natural periodic orbit-attitude behaviors for rigid bodies in three-body periodic orbits☆
,
2017
.
[7]
Michèle Lavagna,et al.
Dynamical analysis of rendezvous and docking with very large space infrastructures in non-Keplerian orbits
,
2018
.
[8]
J. Marsden,et al.
Dynamical Systems, the Three-Body Problem and Space Mission Design
,
2009
.
[9]
Davide Guzzetti,et al.
Coupled Orbit-Attitude Dynamics in the Three-Body Problem: A Family of Orbit-Attitude Periodic Solutions
,
2014
.
[10]
T. R. Kane,et al.
Dynamics of a cantilever beam attached to a moving base
,
1987
.