The possibilities and limits of impact and engagement in research on military institutions

Funding information Research Councils UK, Economic and Social Research Council [Grant Number: ES/L012944/1]. Military geographical research often requires direct engagement with military institutions. Although the morality of such engagements is often debated, the details of engagement in practice have been less scrutinised. Scrutiny is important, as military engagements can shape research‐derived critiques and can influence the communication of research outcomes to both military and academic research communities. Military engagement comprises the communication of data, theories, and concepts about military activities and phenomena, with military personnel and institutions, in textual, representational, and interpersonal modes. The paper examines Geography's history of research engagement to show the complexities and debates around this seemingly straightforward idea. It then introduces a research project and wider research programme on the UK armed forces reserves which provides the empirical context from which we draw our observations about military engagement. We then consider two issues, language and institutional cultures, for their insights into the complexities of military engagement. We conclude by considering the politics of engagement in contemporary critical military geographical research.

[1]  V. Basham,et al.  The gendered politics of researching military policy in the age of the ‘knowledge economy’ , 2021, Review of International Studies.

[2]  Andrew D. Lohman,et al.  Approaches to researching and teaching military geography , 2019, A Research Agenda for Military Geographies.

[3]  Patrick Bury,et al.  Future Reserves 2020, the British Army and the politics of military innovation during the Cameron era , 2019, International Affairs.

[4]  K. Wright,et al.  NATO, Gender and the Military , 2019 .

[5]  Aiko Holvikivi Gender experts and critical friends: research in relations of proximity , 2019, European Journal of Politics and Gender.

[6]  Isla Forsyth A genealogy of military geographies: Complicities, entanglements, and legacies , 2019, Geography Compass.

[7]  T. Edmunds,et al.  Militarization, stigma, and resistance: negotiating military reservist identity in the civilian workplace , 2019, Critical Military Studies.

[8]  T. Edmunds,et al.  Reserve Forces and the Privatization of the Military by the Nation State , 2018, The Sociology of Privatized Security.

[9]  Katherine E. Smith,et al.  Rethinking policy ‘impact’: four models of research-policy relations , 2017, Palgrave Communications.

[10]  M. Sheaff Constructing accounts of organisational failure: Policy, power and concealment , 2017 .

[11]  R. Woodward,et al.  The Palgrave International Handbook of Gender and the Military , 2017 .

[12]  V. Basham,et al.  Critical Military Studies as Method: An Approach to Studying Gender and the Military , 2017 .

[13]  Joseph Pierce,et al.  Iterative parallelism as research praxis: embracing the discursive incommensurability of scholarship and everyday politics , 2016 .

[14]  V. Basham,et al.  Encounters with the Military , 2016 .

[15]  K. Blackstock,et al.  Participatory research to influence participatory governance: managing relationships with planners , 2015 .

[16]  Rachel Woodward,et al.  Geography, military geography, and critical military studies , 2015 .

[17]  R. Woodward Military landscapes , 2014 .

[18]  Joel Wainwright Geopiracy: Oaxaca, Militant Empiricism, and Geographical Thought , 2012 .

[19]  Glyn Williams,et al.  The disciplining effects of impact evaluation practices: negotiating the pressures of impact within an ESRC–DFID project , 2012 .

[20]  T. Slater Impacted geographers: a response to Pain, Kesby and Askins , 2012 .

[21]  M. Woods,et al.  Applied policy research and critical human geography , 2011 .

[22]  R. Pain,et al.  Geographies of impact: power, participation and potential , 2011 .

[23]  N. Gibson Participatory action research approaches and methods , 2010 .

[24]  Simon Dalby Recontextualising violence, power and nature: The next twenty years of critical geopolitics? , 2010 .

[25]  D. Gregory War and peace , 2010 .

[26]  Thomas J. Nolan Military Geography from Peace to War , 2009 .

[27]  M. Keith Public sociology? Between heroic immersion and critical distance: Personal reflections on academic engagement with political life , 2008 .

[28]  Clionadh Raleigh,et al.  The Geography of War and Peace: From Death Camps to Diplomats , 2005 .

[29]  M. Naughton ‘Evidence-based policy’ and the government of the criminal justice system - only if the evidence fits! , 2005 .

[30]  K. Clayton,et al.  Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers , 1959 .

[31]  Helena Carreiras Gender and civil-military relations , 2015 .

[32]  Yagil Levy Time for Critical Military Sociology , 2015 .

[33]  Christopher Bear,et al.  Intervention: The Impact Agenda and Human Geography in UK Higher Education , 2014 .

[34]  F. Moore,et al.  War and Peace , 1918, Nature.