Demographic stochasticity and the variance reduction effect

Demographic stochasticity is almost universally modeled as sampling var- iance in a homogeneous population, although it is defined as arising from random variation among individuals. This can lead to serious misestimation of the extinction risk in small populations. Here, we derive analytical expressions showing that the misestimation for each demographic parameter is exactly (in the case of survival) or approximately (in the case of fecundity) proportional to the among-individual variance in that parameter. We also show why this misestimation depends on systematic variation among individuals, rather than random variation. These results indicate that correctly assessing the importance of demo- graphic stochasticity requires (1) an estimate of the variance in each demographic parameter; (2) information on the qualitative shape (convex or concave) of the mean-variance rela- tionship; and (3) information on the mechanisms generating among-individual variation. An important consequence is that almost all population viability analyses (PVAs) over- estimate the importance of demographic stochasticity and, therefore, the risk of extinction.

[1]  Amy W. Ando,et al.  On the Use of Demographic Models of Population Viability in Endangered Species Management , 1998 .

[2]  Stephen P. Ellner,et al.  When is it meaningful to estimate an extinction probability , 2000 .

[3]  G. Belovsky,et al.  Experimental studies of extinction dynamics , 1999, Science.

[4]  R. Shaw.  THE COMPARISON OF QUANTITATIVE GENETIC PARAMETERS BETWEEN POPULATIONS , 1991, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[5]  E. Menges.  Stochastic Modeling of Extinction in Plant Populations , 1992 .

[6]  William Gurney,et al.  Modelling fluctuating populations , 1982 .

[7]  P. Holgate,et al.  Matrix Population Models. , 1990 .

[8]  Shripad Tuljapurkar,et al.  Structured-Population Models in Marine, Terrestrial, and Freshwater Systems , 1997, Population and Community Biology Series.

[9]  R. Macarthur,et al.  The Theory of Island Biogeography , 1969 .

[10]  R. Levins,et al.  The effect of random variations of different types on population growth. , 1969, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  Survival analysis using the SAS system , 1995 .

[12]  Øyvind Bakke,et al.  Demographic and Environmental Stochasticity Concepts and Definitions , 1998 .

[13]  F. Galton,et al.  On the Probability of the Extinction of Families , 1875 .

[14]  P. H. Leslie.  A STOCHASTIC MODEL FOR STUDYING THE PROPERTIES OF CERTAIN BIOLOGICAL SYSTEMS BY NUMERICAL METHODS , 1958 .

[15]  Shripad Tuljapurkar,et al.  Population Dynamics in Variable Environments , 1990 .

[16]  M. Ayres,et al.  Jensen's inequality predicts effects of environmental variation. , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[17]  Jean Clobert,et al.  Demographic Stochasticity and Social Mating System in the Process of Extinction of Small Populations: The Case of Passerines Introduced to New Zealand , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[18]  J. Jensen.  Sur les fonctions convexes et les inégalités entre les valeurs moyennes , 1906 .

[19]  R. Lande.  Risks of Population Extinction from Demographic and Environmental Stochasticity and Random Catastrophes , 1993, The American Naturalist.

[20]  Mark L. Shaffer,et al.  Population Viability Analysis , 1990, Challenges in the Conservation of Biological Resources.

[21]  H. Resit Akçakaya,et al.  Predictive accuracy of population viability analysis in conservation biology , 2000, Nature.

[22]  B. Kendall,et al.  Variation among Individuals and Reduced Demographic Stochasticity , 2002, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[23]  D. Ludwig.  Is it meaningful to estimate a probability of extinction , 1999 .

[24]  Barry W. Brook,et al.  Pessimistic and Optimistic Bias in Population Viability Analysis , 2000 .

[25]  William Feller.  Die Grundlagen der Volterraschen Theorie des Kampfes ums Dasein in wahrscheinlichkeitstheoretischer Behandlung , 1939 .

[26]  N S Goel,et al.  On the extinction of a colonizing species. , 1972, Theoretical population biology.

[27]  D. Kendall.  Stochastic Processes and Population Growth , 1949 .

[28]  P. Service,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL EVOLUTION OF SENESCENCE: AN ANALYSIS USING A “HETEROGENEITY” MORTALITY MODEL , 1998, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[29]  K. Albertsen.  The Extinction of Families , 1995 .

[30]  G. Fox.  Failure Time Analysis: Studying Times-to-Events and Rates at Which Events Occur , 2001 .

[31]  M. Shaffer.  Viable Populations for Conservation: Minimum viable populations: coping with uncertainty , 1987 .

[32]  Bruce E. Kendall,et al.  ESTIMATING THE MAGNITUDE OF ENVIRONMENTAL STOCHASTICITY IN SURVIVORSHIP DATA , 1998 .

[33]  M. Gilpin,et al.  Minimum viable populations : Processes of species extinction , 1986 .

[34]  W. Gabriel,et al.  Survival of small populations under demographic stochasticity. , 1992, Theoretical Population Biology.

[35]  M. Turelli.  PHENOTYPIC EVOLUTION, CONSTANT COVARIANCES, AND THE MAINTENANCE OF ADDITIVE VARIANCE , 1988, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[36]  Stephen D. Clark,et al.  Introductory Statistics—A Modelling Approach , 1995 .

[37]  C. Mann,et al.  A Species' Fate, By the Numbers , 1999, Science.

[38]  J. H Pollard,et al.  Mathematical Models for the Growth of Human Populations , 1973 .

[39]  A. Grant,et al.  OPTIMAL REPRODUCTIVE EFFORT IN STOCHASTIC, DENSITY‐DEPENDENT ENVIRONMENTS , 1999, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.