Validity of architectural properties of the hamstring muscles: correlation of ultrasound findings with cadaveric dissection.

The purpose of this study was to compare the architectural parameters of the long head of biceps femoris (BFlh) and semitendinosus (ST) muscles by comparing measurements from ultrasound (US) with those obtained from direct dissection. The BFlh and ST architectures were examined bilaterally in 6 legs from 3 male cadavers. The fascicle length, pennation angle, muscle thickness and muscle and tendon length were obtained from direct measurement and US scans along each muscle. Intraclass correlation coefficients between the two methods ranged from 0.905 to 0.913 for the BFlh variables and from 0.774 to 0.974 for the ST parameters. Compared with the direct measurements, the US method showed a mean typical error of 0.09-0.14 cm for muscle thickness, 1.01-1.31 degrees for the pennation angle, 0.92-1.71 cm for fascicle length and muscle-tendon length measurements. The US method is a valid alternative tool for assessing basic architectural parameters of ST and BFlh components of the hamstring muscles.

[1]  C. Maganaris,et al.  Human tendon behaviour and adaptation, in vivo , 2008, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  G. Loeb,et al.  Real‐time sonography to estimate muscle thickness: Comparison with MRI and CT , 2001, Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU.

[3]  Constantinos N. Maganaris,et al.  Ultrasonographic assessment of human skeletal muscle size , 2003, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[4]  T. Fukunaga,et al.  Muscle and Tendon Interaction During Human Movements , 2002, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.

[5]  R. Lieber,et al.  Skeletal muscle architecture and fiber-type distribution with the multiple bellies of the mouse extensor digitorum longus muscle. , 1997, Acta anatomica.

[6]  J. Halbertsma,et al.  Repeated passive stretching: acute effect on the passive muscle moment and extensibility of short hamstrings. , 1999, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[7]  Akihiro Kanamori,et al.  Decrease of knee flexion torque in patients with ACL reconstruction: combined analysis of the architecture and function of the knee flexor muscles , 2006, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[8]  J. D. Lunnen,et al.  Relationship between muscle length, muscle activity, and torque of the hamstring muscles. , 1981, Physical therapy.

[9]  J. Blackburn,et al.  Sex comparison of hamstring structural and material properties. , 2009, Clinical biomechanics.

[10]  T. Fukunaga,et al.  Muscle architecture and function in humans. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  T. Fukunaga,et al.  Muscle-fiber pennation angles are greater in hypertrophied than in normal muscles. , 1993, Journal of applied physiology.

[12]  B. Juul-Kristensen,et al.  Comparison of muscle sizes and moment arms of two rotator cuff muscles measured by ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging. , 2000, European journal of ultrasound : official journal of the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology.

[13]  Yasuo Kawakami,et al.  The accuracy of volume estimates using ultrasound muscle thickness measurements in different muscle groups , 2004, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[14]  W. Vincent Statistics In Kinesiology , 1994 .

[15]  V. Edgerton,et al.  Muscle architecture of the human lower limb. , 1983, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[16]  T Finni,et al.  Structural and functional features of human muscle–tendon unit , 2006, Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports.

[17]  S. Delp,et al.  Hamstrings and psoas lengths during normal and crouch gait: Implications for muscle‐tendon surgery , 1996, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[18]  Yasuo Kawakami,et al.  Use of Three-Dimensional Ultrasonography for the Analysis of the Fascicle Length of Human Gastrocnemius Muscle During Contractions , 2005 .

[19]  Stephanie J. Woodley,et al.  Hamstring Muscles: Architecture and Innervation , 2005, Cells Tissues Organs.

[20]  P. Cerretelli,et al.  In vivo human gastrocnemius architecture with changing joint angle at rest and during graded isometric contraction. , 1996, The Journal of physiology.

[21]  D. Connell,et al.  Hamstring muscle complex: an imaging review. , 2005, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[22]  M. Narici,et al.  Human skeletal muscle architecture studied in vivo by non-invasive imaging techniques: functional significance and applications. , 1999, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[23]  R. Brand,et al.  Muscle fiber architecture in the human lower limb. , 1990, Journal of biomechanics.

[24]  Jim Dowling,et al.  The effect of ultrasound probe orientation on muscle architecture measurement. , 2007, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[25]  John N. Howell,et al.  In vivo Measurement of Fascicle Length and Pennation Angle of the Human Biceps femoris Muscle , 2001, Cells Tissues Organs.

[26]  W. Herzog Skeletal muscle mechanics: from mechanisms to function , 2001 .

[27]  N. Gill,et al.  Intra‐ and intermuscular variation in human quadriceps femoris architecture assessed in vivo , 2006, Journal of anatomy.

[28]  Jaap Harlaar,et al.  Validation of hamstrings musculoskeletal modeling by calculating peak hamstrings length at different hip angles. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[29]  D. Connell,et al.  Imaging of hamstring injuries: therapeutic implications , 2006, European Radiology.