An emerging view of scientific collaboration: Scientists' perspectives on collaboration and factors that impact collaboration

Collaboration is often a critical aspect of scientific research, which is dominated by complex problems, rapidly changing technology, dynamic growth of knowledge, and highly specialized areas of expertise. An individual scientist can seldom provide all of the expertise and resources necessary to address complex research problems. This paper describes collaboration among a group of scientists, and considers how their experiences are socially shaped. The scientists were members of a newly formed distributed, multi-disciplinary academic research center that was organized into four multi-disciplinary research groups. Each group had 14 to 34 members, including faculty, postdoctoral fellows and students, at four geographically dispersed universities. To investigate challenges that emerge in establishing scientific collaboration, data were collected about members' previous and current collaborative experiences, perceptions regarding collaboration, and work practices during the center's first year of operation. The data for the study includes interviews with members of the center, observations of videoconferences and meetings, and a center-wide sociometric survey. Data analysis has led to the development of a framework that identifies forms of collaboration that emerged among scientists (e.g., complementary and integrative collaboration) and associated factors, which influenced collaboration including personal compatibility, work connections, incentives, and infrastructure. These results may inform the specification of social and organizational practices, which are needed to establish collaboration in distributed, multi-disciplinary research centers.

[1]  N. Lin Social Capital: Frontmatter , 2001 .

[2]  Mirja Iivonen,et al.  The Use of Technology in International Collaboration: Two Case Studies. , 2000 .

[3]  P. Mattessich Collaboration: What Makes It Work , 2001 .

[4]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[5]  Joan H. Fujimura,et al.  Constructing `Do-able' Problems in Cancer Research: Articulating Alignment , 1987 .

[6]  Sharon Lynn Kagan,et al.  United we stand : collaboration for child care and early education services , 1991 .

[7]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Patterns of contact and communication in scientific research collaboration , 1990, CSCW '88.

[8]  Bernard L. Simonin The Importance of Collaborative Know-How: An Empirical Test of the Learning Organization , 1997 .

[9]  Marleen C. Pugach,et al.  Facilitating Interdisciplinary Collaboration on Behalf of Handicapped Children and Youth , 1982 .

[10]  Michael L. Tushman,et al.  Technical Communication in R & D Laboratories: The Impact of Project Work Characteristics , 1978 .

[11]  Diane H. Sonnenwald,et al.  Contested Collaboration: A Descriptive Model of Intergroup Communication in Information System Design , 1995, Inf. Process. Manag..

[12]  Pamela Effrein Sandstrom,et al.  The Use and Misuse of Anthropological Methods in Library and Information Science Research , 1995, The Library Quarterly.

[13]  James D. Thompson Organizations in Action , 1967 .

[14]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Cooperative Learning and Social Interdependence Theory , 2002 .

[15]  Telecommunications Board,et al.  National Collaboratories: Applying Information Technology for Scientific Research , 1993 .

[16]  J. Morse Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analysing talk, text and interaction , 1996 .

[17]  Paul Solomon Discovering information behavior in sense making. II: the social , 1997 .

[18]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Intellectual Teamwork: Social and Technological Foundations of Cooperative Work , 1990 .

[19]  Paul Atkinson,et al.  Trajectories of Collaboration and Competition in a Medical Discovery , 1998 .

[20]  Judith S. Olson,et al.  Distance Matters , 2000, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[21]  L. Suchman Cognition and communication at work: Constituting shared workspaces , 1996 .

[22]  John Scott What is social network analysis , 2010 .

[23]  Rob Kling,et al.  Not just a matter of time: Field differences and the shaping of electronic media in supporting scientific communication , 1999, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[24]  R. Slavin When does cooperative learning increase student achievement , 1983 .

[25]  Paul Solomon,et al.  Discovering Information Behavior in Sense Making: III. The Person , 1997, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[26]  D. Hess Science and Technology in a Multicultural World: The Cultural Politics of Facts and Artifacts , 1995 .

[27]  G. Sonnert What Makes a Good Scientist?: Determinants of Peer Evaluation among Biologists , 1995 .

[28]  Jan Jorgensen,et al.  Some surprising things about collaboration—Knowing how people connect makes it work better , 1996 .

[29]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[30]  E. Wenger Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[31]  Abbas Tashakkori,et al.  Mixed Methodology: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches , 1998 .

[32]  John P. Walsh,et al.  Computer Networks and Scientific Work , 1996 .

[33]  Anne P. Massey,et al.  Getting It Together: Temporal Coordination and Conflict Management in Global Virtual Teams , 2001 .

[34]  John M. Silvester,et al.  The Social Life of Information: Brown, J.S., & Duguid, P. (2000). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing. ISBN 0-87584-762-5. 320 pages , 2000, Internet High. Educ..

[35]  Noriko Hara,et al.  Collaboration in the large: Using video conferencing to facilitate large group interaction , 2002 .

[36]  Diane H. Sonnenwald,et al.  Communication roles that support collaboration during the design process , 1996 .

[37]  P. Sztompka Trust: A Sociological Theory , 2000 .

[38]  J. Birmingham,et al.  The science of collaboration. , 2002, The Case manager.

[39]  Paul Solomon Discovering Information Behavior in Sense Making: II. The Social , 1997, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[40]  Elizabeth Cooley,et al.  Training an Interdisciplinary Team in Communication and Decision-Making Skills , 1994 .

[41]  A. Weinberg Impact of Large-Scale Science on the United States: Big science is here to stay, but we have yet to make the hard financial and educational choices it imposes. , 1961, Science.

[42]  S. Traweek,et al.  Beamtimes and Lifetimes: The World of High Energy Physicists , 1988 .

[43]  D. Ferrin,et al.  The Role of Trust in Organizational Settings , 2001 .

[44]  David F. Channell Pasteur's Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation , 1999 .

[45]  Alain Degenne Social capital: a theory of social structure and action , 2004 .

[46]  M. A. Campion,et al.  The Knowledge, Skill, and Ability Requirements for Teamwork: Implications for Human Resource Management , 1994 .

[47]  SolomonPaul Discovering information behavior in sense making. I , 1997 .

[48]  R. Stake The art of case study research , 1995 .

[49]  Michael Schrage,et al.  No More Teams!: Mastering the Dynamics of Creative Collaboration , 1995 .

[50]  유창조 Naturalistic Inquiry , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[51]  Catherine Westfall,et al.  Big Science: The Growth of Large-Scale Research ed. by Peter Galison, Bruce Hevly (review) , 1992, Technology and Culture.