The role of the right cerebral hemisphere in processing novel metaphoric expressions taken from poetry: A divided visual field study

Previous research suggests that the right hemisphere (RH) may contribute uniquely to the processing of metaphoric language. However, most studies have focused on familiar metaphoric expressions. The present study used the divided visual field paradigm to examine the role of the right cerebral hemisphere in processing novel metaphoric expressions taken from poetry. In two experiments, participants were presented with four types of word pairs, literal, conventional metaphoric and novel metaphoric expressions and unrelated word pairs, and asked to perform a semantic judgment task. Two different SOAs: 400 and 1100 ms were used. The results of both experiments showed that responses to LVF/RH presented target words were more accurate and faster than responses to RVF/LH target words for novel metaphoric expressions, but not for other types of word pairs. These results support previous research indicating that during word recognition, the RH activates a broader range of related meanings than the LH, including novel, nonsalient meanings. The findings thus suggest that the RH may be critically involved in at least one important component of novel metaphor comprehension, i.e., the integration of the individual meanings of two seemingly unrelated concepts into a meaningful metaphoric expression.

[1]  R. Giora Literal vs. figurative language: Different or equal? , 2002 .

[2]  Skye McDonald,et al.  Exploring the Cognitive Basis of Right-Hemisphere Pragmatic Language Disorders , 2000, Brain and Language.

[3]  A. Kasher,et al.  Effects of Right and Left Hemisphere Damage on Performance of the “Right Hemisphere Communication Battery” , 2002, Brain and Language.

[4]  C. Burgess,et al.  Neurocognitive Mechanisms Underlying Metaphor Comprehension and Other Figurative Language , 1996 .

[5]  A. Dietrich,et al.  The cognitive neuroscience of creativity , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[6]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  The role of the right hemisphere in the interpretation of figurative aspects of language. A positron emission tomography activation study. , 1994, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[7]  Michal Lavidor,et al.  The role of the right cerebral hemisphere in processing novel metaphoric expressions: A transcranial magnetic stimulation study , 2008 .

[8]  Christine Chiarello,et al.  Parallel systems for processing language: Hemispheric complementarity in the normal brain. , 2003 .

[9]  Michal Lavidor,et al.  Semantically convergent and semantically divergent priming in the cerebral hemispheres: lexical decision and semantic judgment. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[10]  H. Gardner,et al.  Appreciation of indirect requests by left- and right-brain-damaged patients: The effects of verbal context and conventionality of wording , 1989, Brain and Language.

[11]  Shari R. Baum,et al.  Unilateral brain damage effects on processing homonymous and polysemous words , 2005, Brain and Language.

[12]  S. Glucksberg Understanding figurative language : from metaphors to idioms , 2001 .

[13]  Christine Chiarello,et al.  Right hemisphere language comprehension : perspectives from cognitive neuroscience , 1998 .

[14]  C. Tompkins Knowledge and strategies for processing lexical metaphor after right or left hemisphere brain damage. , 1990, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[15]  D. Lancker,et al.  Comprehension of familiar phrases by left- but not by right-hemisphere damaged patients , 1987, Brain and Language.

[16]  José A. Hinojosa,et al.  Event-Related Potentials and Semantics: An Overview and an Integrative Proposal , 2001, Brain and Language.

[17]  N. Mashal,et al.  Right hemisphere sensitivity to novel metaphoric relations: Application of the signal detection theory , 2008, Brain and Language.

[18]  R. Giora Understanding figurative and literal language: The graded salience hypothesis , 1997 .

[19]  M. Koivisto Time course of semantic activation in the cerebral hemispheres , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[20]  Miriam Faust,et al.  Priming summation in the cerebral hemispheres: evidence from semantically convergent and semantically divergent primes , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[21]  J. Hinojosa,et al.  Neural activity associated with metaphor comprehension: spatial analysis , 2004, Neuroscience Letters.

[22]  Michael J. Brammer,et al.  Deriving meaning: Distinct neural mechanisms for metaphoric, literal, and non-meaningful sentences , 2007, Brain and Language.

[23]  Edward M. Bowden,et al.  Getting the Right Idea: Semantic Activation in the Right Hemisphere May Help Solve Insight Problems , 1998 .

[24]  M. Faust,et al.  Understanding metaphoric sentences in the two cerebral hemispheres. , 2000, Brain and cognition.

[25]  Gibbs,et al.  Figurative thought and figurative language. , 1994 .

[26]  Howard Gardner,et al.  Appreciation of metaphoric alternative word meanings by left and right brain-damaged patients , 1990, Neuropsychologia.

[27]  Mirella Dapretto,et al.  Metaphorical vs. literal word meanings: fMRI evidence against a selective role of the right hemisphere , 2006, NeuroImage.

[28]  J. Coney,et al.  Hemispheric asymmetries in the resolution of lexical ambiguity , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[29]  Edward M. Bowden,et al.  The right hemisphere maintains solution-related activation for yet-to-be-solved problems , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[30]  M. Faust,et al.  Cerebral hemispheric asymmetries in processing lexical metaphors , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[31]  C. Burgess,et al.  Cerebral hemispheric mechanisms in the retrieval of ambiguous word meanings , 1988, Brain and Language.

[32]  H. Gardner,et al.  The comprehension of metaphor in brain-damaged patients. , 1977, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[33]  H. Brownell,et al.  Deficits in inference and social cognition: The effects of right hemisphere brain damage on discourse. , 1998 .

[34]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[35]  R. Giora,et al.  On understanding familiar and less-familiar figurative language☆ , 1999 .

[36]  Christine Chiarello,et al.  Sentence context and lexical ambiguity resolution by the two hemispheres , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[37]  Costanza Papagno,et al.  Left But Not Right Temporal Involvement in Opaque Idiom Comprehension: A Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Study , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[38]  Edward M. Bowden,et al.  Neural Activity When People Solve Verbal Problems with Insight , 2004, PLoS biology.

[39]  Yo Matsumoto Subjective motion and English and Japanese verbs , 1996 .

[40]  T. Hendler,et al.  The role of the right hemisphere in processing nonsalient metaphorical meanings: Application of Principal Components Analysis to fMRI data , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[41]  Asa Kasher,et al.  Differential Effects of Right- and Left-Hemisphere Damage on Understanding Sarcasm and Metaphor , 2000 .

[42]  T. Hendler,et al.  An fMRI investigation of the neural correlates underlying the processing of novel metaphoric expressions , 2007, Brain and Language.

[43]  Brian F. Bowdle,et al.  The career of metaphor. , 2005, Psychological review.

[44]  D. Lancker,et al.  Rags to Riches: Our Increasing Appreciation of Cognitive and Communicative Abilities of the Human Right Cerebral Hemisphere , 1997, Brain and Language.

[45]  R. Giora On Our Mind: Salience, Context, and Figurative Language , 2003 .

[46]  P. Marangolo,et al.  Metaphor Comprehension in Right Brain-Damaged Patients with Visuo-Verbal and Verbal Material: A Dissociation (RE)Considered , 2004, Cortex.

[47]  Mark Beeman,et al.  Coarse semantic coding and discourse comprehension. , 1998 .

[48]  M. Erb,et al.  Neural correlates of metaphor processing. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[49]  Carol A. Seger,et al.  Right hemisphere metaphor processing? Characterizing the lateralization of semantic processes , 2007, Brain and Language.

[50]  H. Gardner,et al.  The effects of right hemisphere damage on the pragmatic interpretation of conversational remarks , 1990, Brain and Language.