Augmenting MRI–transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy with temporal ultrasound data: a clinical feasibility study

PurposeIn recent years, fusion of multi-parametric MRI (mp-MRI) with transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsy has enabled targeted prostate biopsy with improved cancer yield. Target identification is solely based on information from mp-MRI, which is subsequently transferred to the subject coordinates through an image registration approach. mp-MRI has shown to be highly sensitive to detect higher-grade prostate cancer, but suffers from a high rate of false positives for lower-grade cancer, leading to unnecessary biopsies. This paper utilizes a machine-learning framework to further improve the sensitivity of targeted biopsy through analyzing temporal ultrasound data backscattered from the prostate tissue.MethodsTemporal ultrasound data were acquired during targeted fusion prostate biopsy from suspicious cancer foci identified in mp-MRI. Several spectral features, representing the signature of backscattered signal from the tissue, were extracted from the temporal ultrasound data. A supervised support vector machine classification model was trained to relate the features to the result of histopathology analysis of biopsy cores obtained from cancer foci. The model was used to predict the label of biopsy cores for mp-MRI-identified targets in an independent group of subjects.ResultsTraining of the classier was performed on data obtained from 35 biopsy cores. A fivefold cross-validation strategy was utilized to examine the consistency of the selected features from temporal ultrasound data, where we achieved the classification accuracy and area under receiver operating characteristic curve of 94 % and 0.98, respectively. Subsequently, an independent group of 25 biopsy cores was used for validation of the model, in which mp-MRI had identified suspicious cancer foci. Using the trained model, we predicted the tissue pathology using temporal ultrasound data: 16 out of 17 benign cores, as well as all three higher-grade cancer cores, were correctly identified.ConclusionThe results show that temporal analysis of ultrasound data is potentially an effective approach to complement mp-MRI–TRUS-guided prostate cancer biopsy, specially to reduce the number of unnecessary biopsies and to reliably identify higher-grade cancers.

[1]  Hsuan-Tien Lin,et al.  A note on Platt’s probabilistic outputs for support vector machines , 2007, Machine Learning.

[2]  John Platt,et al.  Probabilistic Outputs for Support vector Machines and Comparisons to Regularized Likelihood Methods , 1999 .

[3]  Sheng Xu,et al.  Closed-Loop Control in Fused MR-TRUS Image-Guided Prostate Biopsy , 2007, MICCAI.

[4]  Costantino Leonardo,et al.  Safe digital isolation of the santorini plexus during radical retropubic prostatectomy , 2013, BMC Urology.

[5]  Christophe Iselin,et al.  Importance and determinants of Gleason score undergrading on biopsy sample of prostate cancer in a population-based study , 2013, BMC Urology.

[6]  Andras Lasso,et al.  Ultrasound-Guided Characterization of Interstitial Ablated Tissue Using RF Time Series: Feasibility Study , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  Peter L Choyke,et al.  Imaging prostate cancer: a multidisciplinary perspective. , 2007, Radiology.

[8]  Purang Abolmaesumi,et al.  Tissue Classification Using Ultrasound-Induced Variations in Acoustic Backscattering Features , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  Purang Abolmaesumi,et al.  Ultrasound-Based Predication of Prostate Cancer in MRI-guided Biopsy , 2014, CLIP@MICCAI.

[10]  Purang Abolmaesumi,et al.  Computer-aided diagnosis of prostate cancer with emphasis on ultrasound-based approaches: a review. , 2007, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[11]  Mehdi Moradi,et al.  Ultrasound RF time series for tissue typing: first in vivo clinical results , 2013, Medical Imaging.

[12]  T. Miyagawa,et al.  Real-time elastography for the diagnosis of prostate cancer: evaluation of elastographic moving images. , 2009, Japanese journal of clinical oncology.

[13]  Pingkun Yan,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion guided prostate biopsy improves cancer detection following transrectal ultrasound biopsy and correlates with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. , 2011, The Journal of urology.

[14]  Helmut Ermert,et al.  Ultrasonic multifeature tissue characterization for prostate diagnostics. , 2003, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[15]  P. Choyke,et al.  Real-time MRI-TRUS fusion for guidance of targeted prostate biopsies , 2008, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[16]  Purang Abolmaesumi,et al.  Ultrasound-Based Characterization of Prostate Cancer: An in vivo Clinical Feasibility Study , 2013, MICCAI.

[17]  Neil Fleshner,et al.  Impact of multiparametric endorectal coil prostate magnetic resonance imaging on disease reclassification among active surveillance candidates: a prospective cohort study. , 2012, The Journal of urology.

[18]  Mehdi Moradi,et al.  Multiparametric 3D in vivo ultrasound vibroelastography imaging of prostate cancer: Preliminary results. , 2014, Medical physics.

[19]  Sheng Xu,et al.  Fusion of real-time transrectal ultrasound with pre-acquired MRI for multi-modality prostate imaging , 2007, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[20]  Purang Abolmaesumi,et al.  Augmenting Detection of Prostate Cancer in Transrectal Ultrasound Images Using SVM and RF Time Series , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[21]  J. Fütterer,et al.  ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012 , 2012, European Radiology.

[22]  Jeffrey A. Ketterling,et al.  Recent Advances in Ultrasonic Tissue-Type Imaging of the Prostate , 2007 .

[23]  Baris Turkbey,et al.  Is apparent diffusion coefficient associated with clinical risk scores for prostate cancers that are visible on 3-T MR images? , 2011, Radiology.

[24]  Feng Hua Li,et al.  Influence of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, prostate volume, and PSA density on prostate cancer detection with contrast-enhanced sonography using contrast-tuned imaging technology. , 2013, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[25]  Shyam Natarajan,et al.  MRI–ultrasound fusion for guidance of targeted prostate biopsy , 2013, Current opinion in urology.

[26]  G. Bartsch,et al.  Real‐time elastography for detecting prostate cancer: preliminary experience , 2007, BJU international.

[27]  H. Huisman,et al.  Prostate cancer localization with dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging and proton MR spectroscopic imaging. , 2006, Radiology.

[28]  P. Choyke,et al.  Prostate cancer: value of multiparametric MR imaging at 3 T for detection--histopathologic correlation. , 2010, Radiology.

[29]  Fernando J. Kim,et al.  Is apparent diffusion coefficient associated with clinical risk scores for prostate cancers that are visible on 3-T MR images? , 2011 .

[30]  Hessel Wijkstra,et al.  Transrectal ultrasound imaging and prostate cancer. , 2003, Archivio italiano di urologia, andrologia : organo ufficiale [di] Societa italiana di ecografia urologica e nefrologica.

[31]  J Ophir,et al.  Elastographic imaging. , 2000, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[32]  P. P. Iu,et al.  ESUR prostate MR guidelines. , 2013, European radiology.

[33]  Purang Abolmaesumi,et al.  Tissue typing using ultrasound RF time series: experiments with animal tissue samples. , 2010, Medical physics.