The naming game: A discrepancy among the medical community

As anatomists we rely on the nomenclature of structures in order to describe them appropriately, particularly their orientation in respect to their surrounding. The terminology used by the anatomist to describe an organ, muscle, or nerve within the body is taught to medical students as law. Students learn to describe structures in the “anatomical position”, which has been accepted in the literature since the original Latin Nomina Anatomica. They therefore familiarize themselves with the use of terms such as superior, inferior, posterior and anterior to describe all anatomical structures, except in respect of the heart. The heart is still described in the original Valentine position. As anatomists we owe it to the medical and research community to correct the nomenclature to minimize confusion, and to describe the heart properly in respect to its surrounding structures. Clin. Anat. 29:285–289, 2016. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  R H Anderson,et al.  Towards a new terminology for clinical anatomy, with special reference to the heart , 1996, Clinical anatomy.

[2]  R. Selvester Nomina anatomica contradicta. Especially as relates to the heart and electrocardiology. , 1992, Journal of electrocardiology.

[3]  A. Cook,et al.  Attitudinally correct nomenclature , 2002, Heart.

[4]  Robert H. Anderson,et al.  Describing the Cardiac Components—Attitudinally Appropriate Nomenclature , 2013, Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research.

[5]  Robert H. Anderson,et al.  The following comments provide the views of an anatomist working in the clinical arena of Terminologia Anatomica, with specific reference to the cardiovascular system. , 2009, Journal of anatomy.

[6]  D. Sánchez-Quintana,et al.  Standardized Review of Atrial Anatomy for Cardiac Electrophysiologists , 2013, Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research.

[7]  M. Cerqueira,et al.  Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association , 2002, The international journal of cardiovascular imaging.

[8]  R. Selvester Nomina anatomica contradicta revisited: especially as it relates to cardiac imaging and electrocardiology. , 2008, Journal of electrocardiology.

[9]  D. Sánchez-Quintana,et al.  Cardiac Anatomy for the Interventional Arrhythmologist: I.Terminology and Fluoroscopic Projections , 2010, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[10]  Robert H. Anderson,et al.  The importance of attitudinally appropriate description of cardiac anatomy , 2009, Clinical anatomy.

[11]  S. Mori,et al.  Clinical cardiac structural anatomy reconstructed within the cardiac contour using multidetector‐row computed tomography: Left ventricular outflow tract , 2016, Clinical anatomy.

[12]  K. Hirata,et al.  Clinical cardiac structural anatomy reconstructed within the cardiac contour using multidetector‐row computed tomography: The arrangement and location of the cardiac valves , 2016, Clinical anatomy.

[13]  F. Cosío,et al.  Living anatomy of the atrioventricular junctions. A guide to electrophysiologic mapping. A Consensus Statement from the Cardiac Nomenclature Study Group, Working Group of Arrhythmias, European Society of Cardiology, and the Task Force on Cardiac Nomenclature from NASPE. , 1999, Circulation.

[14]  M. Cerqueira,et al.  Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. , 2002, Circulation.

[15]  Artur Lichtenberg,et al.  The everyday used nomenclature of the aortic root components: the tower of Babel? , 2012, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[16]  Denis Berdajs,et al.  The Anatomy of the Aortic Root , 2002, Cardiovascular surgery.