A positive compression ultrasonography of the lower limb veins is highly predictive of pulmonary embolism on computed tomography in suspected patients

Summary The presence of a clot – even asymptomatic – in the proximal lower limb veins of a patient with clinically suspected pulmonary embolism (PE) provides evidence for venous thromboembolism and indicates anticoagulant therapy in such patients. We aimed at assessing the diagnostic performance of compression ultrasonography as compared to multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) for the diagnosis of PE. We analyzed data from a large outcome management study that included consecutive outpatients referred to the emergency ward with clinically suspected PE. All high clinical probability patients, and all non-high clinical probability patients with a positive D-dimer test underwent both MSCT and CUS. Of the 756 included patients, 232 had PE ruled out on the basis of a negative D-dimer test, and 524 patients underwent both MSCT and CUS. PE was found in 187 out of the 511 patients witha conclusive MSCT. The sensitivity of CUS for the presence of PE on MSCT was 39% (95% confidence interval: 32 to 46%), and its specificity was 99% (95% CI:97 to 100%). Positive and negative likelihood ratios were 42.2 (95% CI: 13.5 to 131.9) and 0.6 (95% CI: 0.5 to 0.7), respectively. We conclude from that large study of unselected patients that CUS has high specificity but low sensitivity, for the diagnosis of PE at MSCT in suspected patients. It allows ruling in the diagnosis of PE without further invasive and/or expensive testing in suspected patients.

[1]  Pieter W Kamphuisen,et al.  Effectiveness of managing suspected pulmonary embolism using an algorithm combining clinical probability, D-dimer testing, and computed tomography. , 2006, JAMA.

[2]  P. Girard,et al.  Deep venous thrombosis in patients with acute pulmonary embolism: prevalence, risk factors, and clinical significance. , 2005, Chest.

[3]  U. Schoepf Computed tomography for pulmonary embolism diagnosis: the making of a reference standard , 2005, Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH.

[4]  K. Zou,et al.  Clinical validity of a negative computed tomography scan in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a systematic review. , 2005, JAMA.

[5]  H. Bounameaux,et al.  The Challenge of Diagnosing Pulmonary Embolism in Elderly Patients: Influence of Age on Commonly Used Diagnostic Tests and Strategies , 2005, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[6]  M. Revel,et al.  Multidetector-row computed tomography in suspected pulmonary embolism. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  John Eng,et al.  Accuracy of CT in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: a systematic literature review. , 2004, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[8]  Himanshu Shah,et al.  Suspected acute pulmonary embolism: evaluation with multi-detector row CT versus digital subtraction pulmonary arteriography. , 2004, Radiology.

[9]  A. Didier,et al.  Diagnostic performance of complete lower limb venous ultrasound in patients with clinically suspected acute pulmonary embolism , 2003, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[10]  M. Prins,et al.  Single-Detector Helical Computed Tomography as the Primary Diagnostic Test in Suspected Pulmonary Embolism: A Multicenter Clinical Management Study of 510 Patients , 2003, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[11]  P. Grenier,et al.  Diagnostic strategy for patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a prospective multicentre outcome study , 2002, The Lancet.

[12]  E. Oger,et al.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Compression Ultrasonography for the Detection of Asymptomatic Deep Venous Thrombosis in Medical Patients , 2001, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[13]  T. Perneger,et al.  Assessing clinical probability of pulmonary embolism in the emergency ward: a simple score. , 2001, Archives of internal medicine.

[14]  T. Perneger,et al.  Predicting Adverse Outcome in Patients with Acute Pulmonary Embolism: A Risk Score , 2000, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[15]  G. Simonneau,et al.  High prevalence of detectable deep venous thrombosis in patients with acute pulmonary embolism. , 1999, Chest.

[16]  D. Slosman,et al.  Non-invasive diagnosis of venous thromboembolism in outpatients , 1999, The Lancet.

[17]  Jeffrey S. Ginsberg,et al.  The Role of Venous Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis of Suspected Deep Venous Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism , 1998, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[18]  J. T. ten Cate,et al.  Diagnostic Utility of Ultrasonography of Leg Veins in Patients Suspected of Having Pulmonary Embolism , 1997, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[19]  E. Oger,et al.  Diagnostic value of a negative single complete compression ultrasound of the lower limbs to exclude the diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis in pregnant or postpartum women: a retrospective hospital-based study. , 2006, Thrombosis research.

[20]  H. Büller,et al.  Feasibility, safety and clinical utility of angiography in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism , 2004, European Radiology.

[21]  J. Hirsh,et al.  Accuracy of Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Deep Venous Thrombosis in Asymptomatic Patients after Orthopedic Surgery , 1995, Annals of Internal Medicine.