Detection of carotid stenosis. From NASCET results to clinical practice.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Results from large multicenter studies have shown that carotid endarterectomy, performed with low perioperative morbidity and mortality, is beneficial for patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis > or = 70% as calculated according to strict angiographic criteria. To apply these results in clinical practice, individual institutions should determine whether locally implemented duplex ultrasonography adequately identifies patients with > or = 70% stenosis and whether the degree of stenosis reported by local angiographers correlates with strict angiographic measurements. METHODS We compared estimates of carotid stenosis obtained by duplex ultrasonography and the radiologists' reports from conventional cerebral angiography with each other and with results obtained using North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) criteria. RESULTS One hundred seventy-one vessels were available for review. In 155 (91%) of the cases, the reports from the ultrasound and angiogram were in agreement with regard to whether the stenosis was > or = 70% or < 70%. In 11 of the 16 cases where there was a disparity between the studies, the ultrasound was in closer agreement with measurements obtained using NASCET criteria. Nine of the angiography reports overestimated the degree of stenosis compared with NASCET measurements; twice angiography underestimated the stenosis. Twice the ultrasound underestimated the stenosis, and three times it overestimated the stenosis. CONCLUSIONS Duplex ultrasonography was highly sensitive for detecting significant carotid stenosis at our institution; however, angiography reports often graded the degree of stenosis to be more severe than measurements obtained using NASCET criteria. Institutions that evaluate patients for carotid endarterectomy should investigate the correlation between their ultrasound and angiographic studies so that the results of carotid endarterectomy trials can be accurately applied.

[1]  T. Jensen,et al.  MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial: interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70-99%) or with mild (0-29%) carotid stenosis. European Carotid Surgery Trialists' Collaborative Group , 1991 .

[2]  G. Moneta,et al.  Correlation of North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) angiographic definition of 70% to 99% internal carotid artery stenosis with duplex scanning. , 1993, Journal of vascular surgery.

[3]  M. Whittle,et al.  Efficacy of screening MR angiography and Doppler ultrasonography in the evaluation of carotid artery stenosis. , 1994, The American surgeon.

[4]  D. Pelz,et al.  Stenosis of the carotid bifurcation: subjective assessment compared with strict measurement guidelines. , 1993, Canadian Association of Radiologists journal = Journal l'Association canadienne des radiologistes.

[5]  C. Warlow,et al.  MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial: interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70-99%) or with mild (0-29%) carotid stenosis , 1991, The Lancet.

[6]  E. Di Cesare,et al.  Detection of internal carotid artery stenosis. Comparison of 2D-MR angiography, duplex scanning, and arteriography. , 1993, The Journal of cardiovascular surgery.

[7]  P A Turski,et al.  Magnetic resonance angiography and duplex imaging: noninvasive tests for selecting symptomatic carotid endarterectomy candidates. , 1993, Surgery.

[8]  J. Tsuruda,et al.  Noninvasive Evaluation of Cerebral Ischemia: Trends for the 1990s , 1991, Circulation.

[9]  J. Ricotta,et al.  Guidelines for carotid endarterectomy. A multidisciplinary consensus statement from the Ad Hoc Committee, American Heart Association. , 1995, Circulation.

[10]  A. Alexandrov,et al.  Measuring Carotid Stenosis Time for a Reappraisal , 1993, Stroke.

[11]  Ralph G. Dacey,et al.  Carotid Endarterectomy and Prevention of Cerebral Ischemia in Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis , 1991 .

[12]  D. Sackett,et al.  Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  S. Atlas,et al.  Blinded‐Reader Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Angiography and Duplex Ultrasonography for Carotid Artery Bifurcation Stenosis , 1994, Stroke.

[14]  N. Mendell,et al.  Sex Differences in High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Among Low‐Level Alcohol Consumers , 1991, Circulation.

[15]  W. Mali,et al.  Carotid bifurcation imaging: magnetic resonance angiography compared to conventional angiography and Doppler ultrasound. , 1993, European journal of vascular surgery.