Caulobacter requires a dedicated mechanism to initiate chromosome segregation

Chromosome segregation in bacteria is rapid and directed, but the mechanisms responsible for this movement are still unclear. We show that Caulobacter crescentus makes use of and requires a dedicated mechanism to initiate chromosome segregation. Caulobacter has a single circular chromosome whose origin of replication is positioned at one cell pole. Upon initiation of replication, an 8-kb region of the chromosome containing both the origin and parS moves rapidly to the opposite pole. This movement requires the highly conserved ParABS locus that is essential in Caulobacter. We use chromosomal inversions and in vivo time-lapse imaging to show that parS is the Caulobacter site of force exertion, independent of its position in the chromosome. When parS is moved farther from the origin, the cell waits for parS to be replicated before segregation can begin. Also, a mutation in the ATPase domain of ParA halts segregation without affecting replication initiation. Chromosome segregation in Caulobacter cannot occur unless a dedicated parS guiding mechanism initiates movement.

[1]  A. Grossman,et al.  Identification and Characterization of a Bacterial Chromosome Partitioning Site , 1998, Cell.

[2]  Thomas Kruse,et al.  Bacterial Mitotic Machineries , 2004, Cell.

[3]  M. Waldor,et al.  par genes and the pathology of chromosome loss in Vibrio cholerae , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  Brian P. Frushour,et al.  A parA Homolog Selectively Influences Positioning of the Large Chromosome Origin in Vibrio cholerae , 2006, Journal of bacteriology.

[5]  Eric C. Olivares,et al.  A phage integrase directs efficient site-specific integration in human cells. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  Christopher M Thomas,et al.  Deletion of the parA (soj) Homologue in Pseudomonas aeruginosa Causes ParB Instability and Affects Growth Rate, Chromosome Segregation, and Motility , 2007, Journal of bacteriology.

[7]  Patrick T. McGrath,et al.  Rapid and sequential movement of individual chromosomal loci to specific subcellular locations during bacterial DNA replication. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  G. Jensen,et al.  A Self-Associating Protein Critical for Chromosome Attachment, Division, and Polar Organization in Caulobacter , 2008, Cell.

[9]  S. Jun,et al.  Time scale of entropic segregation of flexible polymers in confinement: implications for chromosome segregation in filamentous bacteria. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[10]  Zemer Gitai,et al.  MreB Actin-Mediated Segregation of a Specific Region of a Bacterial Chromosome , 2005, Cell.

[11]  C. Woldringh,et al.  Single-particle tracking of oriC-GFP fluorescent spots during chromosome segregation in Escherichia coli. , 2005, Journal of structural biology.

[12]  C. Woldringh,et al.  Structural and physical aspects of bacterial chromosome segregation. , 2006, Journal of structural biology.

[13]  R. B. Jensen,et al.  Plasmid and chromosome partitioning: surprises from phylogeny , 2000, Molecular microbiology.

[14]  Yu-Ling Shih,et al.  The Bacterial Cytoskeleton , 2006, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews.

[15]  D. Sherratt,et al.  MukB colocalizes with the oriC region and is required for organization of the two Escherichia coli chromosome arms into separate cell halves , 2007, Molecular microbiology.

[16]  J. Theriot,et al.  Fine-scale time-lapse analysis of the biphasic, dynamic behaviour of the two Vibrio cholerae chromosomes , 2006, Molecular microbiology.

[17]  N. Kleckner,et al.  Chromosome and Replisome Dynamics in E. coli: Loss of Sister Cohesion Triggers Global Chromosome Movement and Mediates Chromosome Segregation , 2005, Cell.

[18]  J. Pogliano,et al.  Intracellular mobility of plasmid DNA is limited by the ParA family of partitioning systems , 2008, Molecular microbiology.

[19]  S. Jun,et al.  Entropy-driven spatial organization of highly confined polymers: Lessons for the bacterial chromosome , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  A. Grossman,et al.  spo0J is required for normal chromosome segregation as well as the initiation of sporulation in Bacillus subtilis , 1994, Journal of bacteriology.

[21]  Margaret C. M. Smith,et al.  In vitro site-specific integration of bacteriophage DNA catalyzed by a recombinase of the resolvase/invertase family. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  J. Livny,et al.  Distribution of Centromere-Like parS Sites in Bacteria: Insights from Comparative Genomics , 2007, Journal of bacteriology.

[23]  L Shapiro,et al.  Rate, origin, and bidirectionality of Caulobacter chromosome replication as determined by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. , 1989, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  F. Boccard,et al.  Spatial arrangement and macrodomain organization of bacterial chromosomes , 2005, Molecular microbiology.

[25]  H. Niki,et al.  Dynamic organization of chromosomal DNA in Escherichia coli. , 2000, Genes & development.

[26]  F. Hansen,et al.  The Escherichia coli chromosome is organized with the left and right chromosome arms in separate cell halves , 2006, Molecular microbiology.

[27]  G. Marczynski.  Chromosome Methylation and Measurement of Faithful, Once and Only Once per Cell Cycle Chromosome Replication inCaulobacter crescentus , 1999, Journal of bacteriology.

[28]  H. Niki,et al.  migS, a cis‐acting site that affects bipolar positioning of oriC on the Escherichia coli chromosome , 2004, The EMBO journal.

[29]  L. Shapiro,et al.  MipZ, a Spatial Regulator Coordinating Chromosome Segregation with Cell Division in Caulobacter , 2006, Cell.

[30]  T. Leonard,et al.  Bacterial chromosome segregation: structure and DNA binding of the Soj dimer — a conserved biological switch , 2005, The EMBO journal.

[31]  L. Shapiro,et al.  A Polymeric Protein Anchors the Chromosomal Origin/ParB Complex at a Bacterial Cell Pole , 2008, Cell.

[32]  M. Waldor,et al.  Distinct Centromere-Like parS Sites on the Two Chromosomes of Vibrio spp , 2007, Journal of bacteriology.

[33]  M. Waldor,et al.  A dynamic, mitotic-like mechanism for bacterial chromosome segregation. , 2006, Genes & development.

[34]  R. Losick,et al.  RacA, a Bacterial Protein That Anchors Chromosomes to the Cell Poles , 2002, Science.

[35]  J. Gober,et al.  The chromosome partitioning protein, ParB, is required for cytokinesis in Caulobacter crescentus , 2001, Molecular microbiology.

[36]  A. Grossman,et al.  The extrusion-capture model for chromosome partitioning in bacteria. , 2001, Genes & development.

[37]  Jie Yan,et al.  Defining a centromere-like element in Bacillus subtilis by Identifying the binding sites for the chromosome-anchoring protein RacA. , 2005, Molecular cell.

[38]  D. Weibel,et al.  Reconstitution of DNA Segregation Driven by Assembly of a Prokaryotic Actin Homolog , 2007, Science.

[39]  R. Losick,et al.  Does RNA polymerase help drive chromosome segregation in bacteria? , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[40]  B. Ely.  Genetics of Caulobacter crescentus. , 1991, Methods in enzymology.

[41]  François Jacob,et al.  On the Regulation of DNA Replication in Bacteria , 1963 .

[42]  G. Jensen,et al.  A multimeric pole-organizing protein critical for chromosome attachment , division and protein localization in Caulobacter , 2009 .

[43]  L. Shapiro,et al.  Cell-cycle control of a cloned chromosomal origin of replication from Caulobacter crescentus. , 1992, Journal of molecular biology.

[44]  J. Gober,et al.  Cell Cycle–Dependent Polar Localization of Chromosome Partitioning Proteins in Caulobacter crescentus , 1997, Cell.

[45]  D. Lane,et al.  ParABS Systems of the Four Replicons of Burkholderia cenocepacia: New Chromosome Centromeres Confer Partition Specificity , 2006, Journal of bacteriology.

[46]  J. Bouet,et al.  Probing the ATP‐binding site of P1 ParA: partition and repression have different requirements for ATP binding and hydrolysis , 2001, The EMBO journal.