A methodological framework for the use of landscape graphs in land-use planning

Landscape graphs are now widely used for representing and analysing ecological networks. Although several studies have provided methodological syntheses of how to use these tools to quantify functional connectivity, it is still unclear how landscape graphs can be used for decision support in land planning. This paper outlines the different types of application that may provide relevant responses to the main questions arising in land planning about ecological networks. Three approaches are distinguished according to their objective: (1) to support prioritisation within an ecological network from a conservationist perspective; (2) to increase connectivity by identifying the best locations for adding new elements to the network, either when starting from the current state of the network or when seeking to mitigate the barrier effect engendered by a development project; (3) to assess the potential impact of a development project in terms of decreased connectivity. The computations based on connectivity metrics are explained for each of these three approaches. Then each approach is illustrated in the context of a pond network near the town of Belfort, in eastern France. The results show how the same connectivity metric used in the different approaches may serve different purposes. This emphasises the potential value of landscape graphs for the land-planning decision-support process and not just for conservation purposes (i.e. prioritisation).

[1]  Jon Norberg,et al.  A Network Approach for Analyzing Spatially Structured Populations in Fragmented Landscape , 2007, Landscape Ecology.

[2]  J. Foltête,et al.  Integrating graph-based connectivity metrics into species distribution models , 2012, Landscape Ecology.

[3]  Jean-Christophe Foltête,et al.  Impact assessment of a high-speed railway line on species distribution: application to the European tree frog (Hyla arborea) in Franche-Comté. , 2013, Journal of environmental management.

[4]  Paul Beier,et al.  The Role of Landscape Connectivity in Planning and Implementing Conservation and Restoration Priorities. Issues in Ecology , 2012 .

[5]  Paul Beier,et al.  Conceptualizing and Designing Corridors for Climate Change , 2012, Ecological Restoration.

[6]  Dean L. Urban,et al.  Prioritizing Reserves for Acquisition , 2002 .

[7]  L. Maiorano,et al.  Ecological Networks as Conceptual Frameworks or Operational Tools in Conservation , 2007, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[8]  Peter Vogt,et al.  Mapping Spatial Patterns with Morphological Image Processing , 2007, Landscape Ecology.

[9]  Neftalí Sillero,et al.  The pond network: can structural connectivity reflect on (amphibian) biodiversity patterns? , 2011, Landscape Ecology.

[10]  Bruce T. Milne,et al.  Detecting Critical Scales in Fragmented Landscapes , 1997 .

[11]  Brad H McRae,et al.  Connectivity Planning to Address Climate Change , 2013, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[12]  Dénes Schmera,et al.  Network thinking in riverscape conservation – A graph-based approach , 2011 .

[13]  Jack Ahern,et al.  Greenways as a planning strategy , 1995 .

[14]  Dean L Urban,et al.  Graph theory as a proxy for spatially explicit population models in conservation planning. , 2007, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[15]  Marie-Josée Fortin,et al.  Spatial Graphs: Principles and Applications for Habitat Connectivity , 2007, Ecosystems.

[16]  Pedro Segurado,et al.  Using spatial network structure in landscape management and planning: A case study with pond turtles , 2011 .

[17]  Peter Vogt,et al.  Key structural forest connectors can be identified by combining landscape spatial pattern and network analyses. , 2011 .

[18]  William L. Allen,et al.  Beyond on-site mitigation: An integrated, multi-scale approach to environmental mitigation and stewardship for transportation projects , 2010 .

[19]  Robert Barbault,et al.  Loss of Biodiversity, Overview , 2013 .

[20]  Jean-Christophe Foltête,et al.  Designing a graph-based approach to landscape ecological assessment of linear infrastructures , 2013 .

[21]  Renato Crouzeilles,et al.  The importance of using sustainable use protected areas for functional connectivity , 2013 .

[22]  Ferenc Jordán,et al.  Landscape metrics as indicators: Quantifying habitat network changes of a bush-cricket Pholidoptera transsylvanica in Hungary , 2011 .

[23]  Santiago Saura,et al.  Improving landscape connectivity in forest districts: A two-stage process for prioritizing agricultural patches for reforestation , 2011 .

[24]  Paul Beier,et al.  Where to Restore Ecological Connectivity? Detecting Barriers and Quantifying Restoration Benefits , 2012, PloS one.

[25]  Justin M. Calabrese,et al.  A comparison-shopper's guide to connectivity metrics , 2004 .

[26]  Santiago Saura,et al.  A new habitat availability index to integrate connectivity in landscape conservation planning : Comparison with existing indices and application to a case study , 2007 .

[27]  Kevin McGarigal,et al.  Estimating landscape resistance to movement: a review , 2012, Landscape Ecology.

[28]  Erik Matthysen,et al.  The application of 'least-cost' modelling as a functional landscape model , 2003 .

[29]  Andrew Fall,et al.  Connectivity for conservation: a framework to classify network measures. , 2011, Ecology.

[30]  S. Dong,et al.  Characterizing the "fragmentation-barrier" effect of road networks on landscape connectivity: a case study in Xishuangbanna, Southwest China. , 2010 .

[31]  Marie-Josée Fortin,et al.  From Graphs to Spatial Graphs , 2010 .

[32]  A. Laita,et al.  Graph-theoretic connectivity measures: what do they tell us about connectivity? , 2011, Landscape Ecology.

[33]  Paul Galpern,et al.  Grains of connectivity: analysis at multiple spatial scales in landscape genetics , 2012, Molecular ecology.

[34]  David M. Theobald,et al.  Incorporating biological information in local land-use decision making: designing a system for conservation planning , 2004, Landscape Ecology.

[35]  Ulla Mörtberg,et al.  Making graph theory operational for landscape ecological assessments, planning, and design , 2010 .

[36]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  On the limitations of graph‐theoretic connectivity in spatial ecology and conservation , 2011 .

[37]  Timothy H. Keitt,et al.  LANDSCAPE CONNECTIVITY: A GRAPH‐THEORETIC PERSPECTIVE , 2001 .

[38]  Mark D. McDonnell,et al.  Mathematical Methods for Spatially Cohesive Reserve Design , 2002 .

[39]  Santiago Saura,et al.  Assessing the importance of individual habitat patches as irreplaceable connecting elements: An analysis of simulated and real landscape data , 2012 .

[40]  Scott J. Goetz,et al.  Connectivity of core habitat in the Northeastern United States: Parks and protected areas in a landscape context , 2009 .

[41]  S. Saura,et al.  Comparison and development of new graph-based landscape connectivity indices: towards the priorization of habitat patches and corridors for conservation , 2006, Landscape Ecology.

[42]  Bruce Hannon,et al.  Ecological network analysis : network construction , 2007 .

[43]  Larry D. Harris,et al.  Nodes, networks, and MUMs: Preserving diversity at all scales , 1986 .

[44]  B. S. S. Devi,et al.  Forest patch connectivity diagnostics and prioritization using graph theory , 2013 .

[45]  Todd R. Lookingbill,et al.  Combining a dispersal model with network theory to assess habitat connectivity. , 2010, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[46]  Timothy H. Keitt,et al.  Landscape connectivity: A conservation application of graph theory , 2000 .

[47]  Santiago Saura,et al.  Integrating landscape connectivity in broad-scale forest planning through a new graph-based habitat availability methodology: application to capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus) in Catalonia (NE Spain) , 2006, European Journal of Forest Research.

[48]  Steven F. Railsback,et al.  Individual-based modeling and ecology , 2005 .

[49]  Adrian Phillips,et al.  Protected for ever?: Factors shaping the future of protected areas policy , 1995 .

[50]  Samuel A. Cushman,et al.  Effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on amphibians: A review and prospectus , 2006 .

[51]  Viral B. Shah,et al.  Using circuit theory to model connectivity in ecology, evolution, and conservation. , 2008, Ecology.

[52]  M. Smith,et al.  Dispersal and the metapopulation paradigm in amphibian ecology and conservation : are all amphibian populations metapopulations? , 2005 .

[53]  Gilles Vuidel,et al.  A software tool dedicated to the modelling of landscape networks , 2012, Environ. Model. Softw..

[54]  Jean-Christophe Foltête,et al.  Assessing the capacity of different urban forms to preserve the connectivity of ecological habitats , 2011 .

[55]  Robert S Schick,et al.  Graph models of habitat mosaics. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[56]  Kristina D. Rothley,et al.  Working backwards to move forwards: Graph-based connectivity metrics for reserve network selection , 2005 .

[57]  Otso Ovaskainen,et al.  The metapopulation capacity of a fragmented landscape , 2000, Nature.

[58]  Andreas Zetterberg,et al.  To model the landscape as a network : A practitioner’s perspective , 2013 .

[59]  P. J. Lozano,et al.  GIS-based approach for incorporating the connectivity of ecological networks into regional planning , 2010 .

[60]  Paul Beier,et al.  Toward Best Practices for Developing Regional Connectivity Maps , 2011, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[61]  Ferenc Jordán,et al.  Contribution of habitat patches to network connectivity: Redundancy and uniqueness of topological indices , 2011 .

[62]  Santiago Saura,et al.  Ranking individual habitat patches as connectivity providers: Integrating network analysis and patch removal experiments , 2010 .

[63]  Andrew Fall,et al.  Patch-based graphs of landscape connectivity: A guide to construction, analysis and application for conservation , 2011 .

[64]  Ferenc Jordán,et al.  Graph theory in action: evaluating planned highway tracks based on connectivity measures , 2009, Landscape Ecology.

[65]  S. Saura,et al.  Key connectors in protected forest area networks and the impact of highways: A transnational case study from the Cantabrian Range to the Western Alps (SW Europe) , 2011 .