Synthetic biology: lessons from engineering yeast MAPK signalling pathways

All living cells respond to external stimuli and execute specific physiological responses through signal transduction pathways. Understanding the mechanisms controlling signalling pathways is important for diagnosing and treating diseases and for reprogramming cells with desired functions. Although many of the signalling components in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae have been identified by genetic studies, many features concerning the dynamic control of pathway activity, cross‐talk, cell‐to‐cell variability or robustness against perturbation are still incompletely understood. Comparing the behaviour of engineered and natural signalling pathways offers insight complementary to that achievable with standard genetic and molecular studies. Here, we review studies that aim at a deeper understanding of signalling design principles and generation of novel signalling properties by engineering the yeast mitogen‐activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways. The underlying approaches can be applied to other organisms including mammalian cells and offer opportunities for building synthetic pathways and functionalities useful in medicine and biotechnology.

[1]  F. Posas,et al.  Targeting the MEF2-Like Transcription Factor Smp1 by the Stress-Activated Hog1 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase , 2003, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[2]  R. Deschenes,et al.  Saccharomyces cerevisiae Histidine Phosphotransferase Ypd1p Shuttles between the Nucleus and Cytoplasm for SLN1-Dependent Phosphorylation of Ssk1p and Skn7p , 2003, Eukaryotic Cell.

[3]  Wendell A. Lim,et al.  Bacterial Virulence Proteins as Tools to Rewire Kinase Pathways in Yeast and Immune Cells , 2012, Nature.

[4]  L. Serrano,et al.  Engineering Signal Transduction Pathways , 2010, Cell.

[5]  C. S. Gal,et al.  Single Amino Acid Substitutions and Deletions That Alter the G Protein Coupling Properties of the V2 Vasopressin Receptor Identified in Yeast by Receptor Random Mutagenesis* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[6]  P. Pryciak,et al.  Designing new cellular signaling pathways. , 2009, Chemistry & biology.

[7]  H. Madhani,et al.  Principles of MAP kinase signaling specificity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2004, Annual review of genetics.

[8]  Hiroaki Kitano,et al.  Robustness and fragility in the yeast high osmolarity glycerol (HOG) signal-transduction pathway , 2009, Molecular systems biology.

[9]  Rishi Garg,et al.  Controlling promoter strength and regulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using synthetic hybrid promoters , 2012, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[10]  B. Errede,et al.  Constitutive mutants of the protein kinase STE11 activate the yeast pheromone response pathway in the absence of the G protein. , 1992, Genes & development.

[11]  I. Herskowitz,et al.  The Hog1 MAPK prevents cross talk between the HOG and pheromone response MAPK pathways in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1998, Genes & development.

[12]  C. Malone,et al.  Activated Alleles of Yeast SLN1 Increase Mcm1-dependent Reporter Gene Expression and Diminish Signaling through the Hog1 Osmosensing Pathway* , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[13]  J. Collins,et al.  Synthetic Biology Moving into the Clinic , 2011, Science.

[14]  Z. Yakhini,et al.  Inferring gene regulatory logic from high-throughput measurements of thousands of systematically designed promoters , 2012, Nature Biotechnology.

[15]  Christof Taxis,et al.  Targeted protein depletion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by activation of a bidirectional degron , 2010, BMC Systems Biology.

[16]  John R. Yates,et al.  Pheromone-Dependent Destruction of the Tec1 Transcription Factor Is Required for MAP Kinase Signaling Specificity in Yeast , 2004, Cell.

[17]  Pamela A. Silver,et al.  Regulated nucleo/cytoplasmic exchange of HOG1 MAPK requires the importin β homologs NMD5 and XPO1 , 1998, The EMBO journal.

[18]  F. Arnold,et al.  Engineering microbial consortia: a new frontier in synthetic biology. , 2008, Trends in biotechnology.

[19]  Kazuo Tatebayashi,et al.  Adaptor functions of Cdc42, Ste50, and Sho1 in the yeast osmoregulatory HOG MAPK pathway , 2006, The EMBO journal.

[20]  M Aldea,et al.  A Set of Vectors with a Tetracycline‐Regulatable Promoter System for Modulated Gene Expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1997, Yeast.

[21]  Roger Brent,et al.  Cell signaling: What is the signal and what information does it carry? , 2009, FEBS letters.

[22]  O. Lichtarge,et al.  C5a Receptor Activation , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[23]  Christina D Smolke,et al.  A synthetic library of RNA control modules for predictable tuning of gene expression in yeast , 2011, Molecular systems biology.

[24]  E. Klipp,et al.  Integrative model of the response of yeast to osmotic shock , 2005, Nature Biotechnology.

[25]  Edda Klipp,et al.  Biophysical properties of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and their relationship with HOG pathway activation , 2010, European Biophysics Journal.

[26]  Casim A Sarkar,et al.  Analyzing and engineering cell signaling modules with synthetic biology. , 2012, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[27]  H. Kaur,et al.  Interactions among HAMP Domain Repeats Act as an Osmosensing Molecular Switch in Group III Hybrid Histidine Kinases from Fungi* , 2010, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[28]  T. Maeda,et al.  Phosphorelay-Regulated Degradation of the Yeast Ssk1p Response Regulator by the Ubiquitin-Proteasome System , 2003, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[29]  R. W. Davis,et al.  Sequences that regulate the divergent GAL1-GAL10 promoter in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1984, Molecular and cellular biology.

[30]  J. Broach,et al.  Identification of surrogate agonists for the human FPRL-1 receptor by autocrine selection in yeast , 1998, Nature Biotechnology.

[31]  Wendell A. Lim,et al.  Designing customized cell signalling circuits , 2010, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[32]  J. Bouwman,et al.  Metabolic regulation rather than de novo enzyme synthesis dominates the osmo‐adaptation of yeast , 2011, Yeast.

[33]  Ahmad S. Khalil,et al.  Synthetic biology: applications come of age , 2010, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[34]  M. Johnston,et al.  Three different regulatory mechanisms enable yeast hexose transporter (HXT) genes to be induced by different levels of glucose , 1995, Molecular and cellular biology.

[35]  Ahmad S. Khalil,et al.  A Synthetic Biology Framework for Programming Eukaryotic Transcription Functions , 2012, Cell.

[36]  Nathan C Shaner,et al.  A guide to choosing fluorescent proteins , 2005, Nature Methods.

[37]  M. Elowitz,et al.  Synthetic Biology: Integrated Gene Circuits , 2011, Science.

[38]  I. Nachman,et al.  Expression of Pseudomonas syringae type III effectors in yeast under stress conditions reveals that HopX1 attenuates activation of the high osmolarity glycerol MAP kinase pathway , 2013, Microbiology.

[39]  Sheng Li,et al.  The yeast histidine protein kinase, Sln1p, mediates phosphotransfer to two response regulators, Ssk1p and Skn7p , 1998, The EMBO journal.

[40]  Nicholas T. Ingolia,et al.  Positive-Feedback Loops as a Flexible Biological Module , 2007, Current Biology.

[41]  T. Maeda,et al.  Activation of yeast PBS2 MAPKK by MAPKKKs or by binding of an SH3-containing osmosensor. , 1995, Science.

[42]  James J. Collins,et al.  Next-Generation Synthetic Gene Networks , 2009, Nature Biotechnology.

[43]  B. Ozenberger,et al.  Functional coupling of a mammalian somatostatin receptor to the yeast pheromone response pathway , 1995, Molecular and cellular biology.

[44]  Alyssa M. Redding,et al.  Metabolic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for the production of n-butanol , 2008, Microbial cell factories.

[45]  G. Giaever,et al.  Design, Synthesis and Characterization of a Highly Effective Inhibitor for Analog-Sensitive (as) Kinases , 2011, PloS one.

[46]  James J. Collins,et al.  Tunable Signal Processing in Synthetic MAP Kinase Cascades , 2011, Cell.

[47]  Fabian Rudolf,et al.  Transient Activation of the HOG MAPK Pathway Regulates Bimodal Gene Expression , 2011, Science.

[48]  C. Widmann,et al.  Mitogen-activated protein kinase: conservation of a three-kinase module from yeast to human. , 1999, Physiological reviews.

[49]  G F Sprague,et al.  Pheromone response elements are necessary and sufficient for basal and pheromone-induced transcription of the FUS1 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1991, Molecular and cellular biology.

[50]  M. Pausch,et al.  G-protein-coupled receptors in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: high-throughput screening assays for drug discovery. , 1997, Trends in biotechnology.

[51]  J. Broach,et al.  High-throughput screening for drug discovery. , 1996, Nature.

[52]  Hiroaki Kitano,et al.  Biological robustness , 2008, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[53]  Josiah P. Zayner,et al.  TULIPs: Tunable, light-controlled interacting protein tags for cell biology , 2012, Nature Methods.

[54]  J. Thorner,et al.  Analysis of Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Signaling Specificity in Response to Hyperosmotic Stress: Use of an Analog-Sensitive HOG1 Allele , 2006, Eukaryotic Cell.

[55]  Stefan Hohmann,et al.  Control of high osmolarity signalling in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2009, FEBS letters.

[56]  U. K. Laemmli,et al.  The anchor-away technique: rapid, conditional establishment of yeast mutant phenotypes. , 2008, Molecular cell.

[57]  W. Lim,et al.  Recruitment interactions can override catalytic interactions in determining the functional identity of a protein kinase , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[58]  Joel S. Bader,et al.  Synthetic chromosome arms function in yeast and generate phenotypic diversity by design , 2011, Nature.

[59]  G. Bellí,et al.  An activator/repressor dual system allows tight tetracycline-regulated gene expression in budding yeast. , 1998, Nucleic acids research.

[60]  Wendell A. Lim,et al.  Rapid Diversification of Cell Signaling Phenotypes by Modular Domain Recombination , 2010, Science.

[61]  H. Kitano,et al.  In Vivo Robustness Analysis of Cell Division Cycle Genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2006, PLoS genetics.

[62]  Michael Knop,et al.  Efficient protein depletion by genetically controlled deprotection of a dormant N-degron , 2009, Molecular systems biology.

[63]  Timothy S. Ham,et al.  Production of the antimalarial drug precursor artemisinic acid in engineered yeast , 2006, Nature.

[64]  J. Thorner,et al.  Function and regulation in MAPK signaling pathways: lessons learned from the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2007, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[65]  H. Saito,et al.  Regulation of cross-talk in yeast MAPK signaling pathways. , 2010, Current opinion in microbiology.

[66]  Hiroaki Kitano,et al.  A framework for mapping, visualisation and automatic model creation of signal-transduction networks , 2012, Molecular systems biology.

[67]  M. Gustin,et al.  MAP Kinase Pathways in the YeastSaccharomyces cerevisiae , 1998, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews.

[68]  Marie-Annick Persuy,et al.  Functional expression of olfactory receptors in yeast and development of a bioassay for odorant screening , 2005, The FEBS journal.

[69]  D. Picard,et al.  Fusion of GAL4-VP16 to a steroid-binding domain provides a tool for gratuitous induction of galactose-responsive genes in yeast. , 1993, Gene.

[70]  Jens Nielsen,et al.  Characterization of different promoters for designing a new expression vector in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2010, Yeast.

[71]  S. Hohmann,et al.  Expression of the yeast aquaporin Aqy2 affects cell surface properties under the control of osmoregulatory and morphogenic signalling pathways , 2009, Molecular microbiology.

[72]  A. Oudenaarden,et al.  A Systems-Level Analysis of Perfect Adaptation in Yeast Osmoregulation , 2009, Cell.

[73]  B. Séraphin,et al.  Positive feedback in eukaryotic gene networks: cell differentiation by graded to binary response conversion , 2001, The EMBO journal.

[74]  Megan N. McClean,et al.  Signal processing by the HOG MAP kinase pathway , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[75]  Tom Ellis,et al.  Rational Diversification of a Promoter Providing Fine-Tuned Expression and Orthogonal Regulation for Synthetic Biology , 2012, PloS one.

[76]  D. Endy,et al.  Refinement and standardization of synthetic biological parts and devices , 2008, Nature Biotechnology.

[77]  E. O’Shea,et al.  Global analysis of protein localization in budding yeast , 2003, Nature.

[78]  Wendell A. Lim,et al.  Optimization of specificity in a cellular protein interaction network by negative selection , 2003, Nature.

[79]  J. Thorner,et al.  Dynamic Localization of Fus3 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Is Necessary To Evoke Appropriate Responses and Avoid Cytotoxic Effects , 2010, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[80]  Kazuo Tatebayashi,et al.  Transmembrane mucins Hkr1 and Msb2 are putative osmosensors in the SHO1 branch of yeast HOG pathway , 2007, The EMBO journal.

[81]  J. Heitman,et al.  Signal Transduction Cascades Regulating Fungal Development and Virulence , 2000, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews.

[82]  A. Nantel,et al.  Identification and Characterization of Antifungal Compounds Using a Saccharomyces cerevisiae Reporter Bioassay , 2012, PloS one.

[83]  Megan N. McClean,et al.  Fast-acting and Nearly Gratuitous Induction of Gene Expression and Protein Depletion in Saccharomyces Cerevisiae Graduate Program in Quantitative and Computational Biology, And , 2022 .

[84]  A. Varshavsky,et al.  Heat-inducible degron: a method for constructing temperature-sensitive mutants. , 1994, Science.

[85]  J. Thorner,et al.  Control of yeast mating signal transduction by a mammalian beta 2-adrenergic receptor and Gs alpha subunit. , 1990, Science.

[86]  C. Bashor,et al.  References and Notes Supporting Online Material Using Engineered Scaffold Interactions to Reshape Map Kinase Pathway Signaling Dynamics , 2022 .

[87]  Kazuo Tatebayashi,et al.  A docking site determining specificity of Pbs2 MAPKK for Ssk2/Ssk22 MAPKKKs in the yeast HOG pathway , 2003, The EMBO journal.

[88]  J. Keasling Manufacturing Molecules Through Metabolic Engineering , 2010, Science.

[89]  Lee Bardwell,et al.  A walk-through of the yeast mating pheromone response pathway , 2004, Peptides.

[90]  J. Collins,et al.  Construction of a genetic toggle switch in Escherichia coli , 2000, Nature.

[91]  M. Elowitz,et al.  A synthetic oscillatory network of transcriptional regulators , 2000, Nature.

[92]  Tom Ellis,et al.  Construction of synthetic regulatory networks in yeast , 2012, FEBS letters.

[93]  Jerome T. Mettetal,et al.  The Frequency Dependence of Osmo-Adaptation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2008, Science.

[94]  J. Thorner,et al.  Stress resistance and signal fidelity independent of nuclear MAPK function , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[95]  Pascale Cossart,et al.  Pathogen-Mediated Posttranslational Modifications: A Re-emerging Field , 2010, Cell.

[96]  D. Botstein,et al.  Yeast: An Experimental Organism for 21st Century Biology , 2011, Genetics.

[97]  Joan Weiner,et al.  Modularity of MAP kinases allows deformation of their signalling pathways , 2009, Nature Cell Biology.

[98]  R. Weiss,et al.  Artificial cell-cell communication in yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae using signaling elements from Arabidopsis thaliana , 2005, Nature Biotechnology.

[99]  P. Pryciak,et al.  Membrane Localization of Scaffold Proteins Promotes Graded Signaling in the Yeast MAP Kinase Cascade , 2008, Current Biology.

[100]  Tatsuya Maeda,et al.  A two-component system that regulates an osmosensing MAP kinase cascade in yeast , 1994, Nature.

[101]  Javier Macía,et al.  Distributed biological computation with multicellular engineered networks , 2011, Nature.

[102]  Frederick S. Vizeacoumar,et al.  Systematic exploration of essential yeast gene function with temperature-sensitive mutants , 2011, Nature Biotechnology.

[103]  B. Kholodenko Cell-signalling dynamics in time and space , 2006, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[104]  Kazuo Shinozaki,et al.  Identification of CRE1 as a cytokinin receptor from Arabidopsis , 2001, Nature.

[105]  S. Hohmann,et al.  Fungal fludioxonil sensitivity is diminished by a constitutively active form of the group III histidine kinase , 2012, FEBS letters.

[106]  R. Weiss,et al.  Foundations for the design and implementation of synthetic genetic circuits , 2012, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[107]  Huimin Zhao,et al.  Iowa State University From the SelectedWorks of Zengyi Shao 2012 Cloning and characterization of a panel of constitutive promoters for applications in pathway engineering in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2017 .

[108]  D. E. Levin,et al.  Regulation of Cell Wall Biogenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: The Cell Wall Integrity Signaling Pathway , 2011, Genetics.

[109]  Edda Klipp,et al.  Computational yeast systems biology: a case study for the MAP kinase cascade. , 2011, Methods in molecular biology.

[110]  Francesc Posas,et al.  Response to Hyperosmotic Stress , 2012, Genetics.

[111]  C. Bashor,et al.  Rewiring cells: synthetic biology as a tool to interrogate the organizational principles of living systems. , 2010, Annual review of biophysics.

[112]  Megan N. McClean,et al.  Cross-talk and decision making in MAP kinase pathways , 2007, Nature Genetics.

[113]  Matthias Peter,et al.  MAP kinase dynamics in response to pheromones in budding yeast , 2001, Nature Cell Biology.

[114]  Pamela A. Silver,et al.  Informing Biological Design by Integration of Systems and Synthetic Biology , 2011, Cell.

[115]  A. Neiman,et al.  A Membrane Binding Domain in the Ste5 Scaffold Synergizes with Gβγ Binding to Control Localization and Signaling in Pheromone Response , 2005 .

[116]  Doryaneh Ahmadpour,et al.  The MAPK Hog1p modulates Fps1p-dependent arsenite uptake and tolerance in yeast. , 2006, Molecular biology of the cell.

[117]  David E. Levin,et al.  Cell Wall Integrity Signaling in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2005, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews.

[118]  Kazuo Tatebayashi,et al.  Glycosylation defects activate filamentous growth Kss1 MAPK and inhibit osmoregulatory Hog1 MAPK , 2009, The EMBO journal.

[119]  R. Kwok Five hard truths for synthetic biology , 2010, Nature.

[120]  Tau-Mu Yi,et al.  Synthetic Morphology Using Alternative Inputs , 2009, PloS one.

[121]  Tatsuo Fukagawa,et al.  An auxin-based degron system for the rapid depletion of proteins in nonplant cells , 2009, Nature Methods.

[122]  Wendell A. Lim,et al.  Rewiring MAP Kinase Pathways Using Alternative Scaffold Assembly Mechanisms , 2003, Science.

[123]  T. Lu,et al.  Synthetic biology: an emerging engineering discipline. , 2012, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[124]  P. Sunnerhagen,et al.  Rck2 Kinase Is a Substrate for the Osmotic Stress-Activated Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Hog1 , 2000, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[125]  B. Errede,et al.  Pheromone induction promotes Ste11 degradation through a MAPK feedback and ubiquitin-dependent mechanism , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[126]  E. S. Klimenko,et al.  Single-Cell Analysis Reveals That Insulation Maintains Signaling Specificity Between Two Yeast MAPK Pathways with Common Components , 2010, Science Signaling.

[127]  J. Ferrell Self-perpetuating states in signal transduction: positive feedback, double-negative feedback and bistability. , 2002, Current opinion in cell biology.

[128]  Ricard Solé,et al.  Dynamic Signaling in the Hog1 MAPK Pathway Relies on High Basal Signal Transduction , 2009, Science Signaling.

[129]  W. Miller,et al.  Processive phosphorylation: mechanism and biological importance. , 2007, Cellular signalling.

[130]  Priscilla E. M. Purnick,et al.  The second wave of synthetic biology: from modules to systems , 2009, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[131]  Paul J Cullen,et al.  The Regulation of Filamentous Growth in Yeast , 2012, Genetics.

[132]  E. Andrianantoandro,et al.  Synthetic biology: new engineering rules for an emerging discipline , 2006, Molecular systems biology.

[133]  A. Yoshimi,et al.  Group III Histidine Kinase Is a Positive Regulator of Hog1-Type Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase in Filamentous Fungi , 2005, Eukaryotic Cell.

[134]  Francesc Posas,et al.  Activation of the yeast SSK2 MAP kinase kinase kinase by the SSK1 two‐component response regulator , 1998, The EMBO journal.

[135]  Lan Huang,et al.  Fus3-Regulated Tec1 Degradation through SCFCdc4 Determines MAPK Signaling Specificity during Mating in Yeast , 2004, Cell.

[136]  Ronald W. Davis,et al.  Functional profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome , 2002, Nature.

[137]  S. Hohmann Osmotic Stress Signaling and Osmoadaptation in Yeasts , 2002, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews.

[138]  Christina D Smolke,et al.  Building outside of the box: iGEM and the BioBricks Foundation , 2009, Nature Biotechnology.