Sparse coding of birdsong and receptive field structure in songbirds

Auditory neurons can be characterized by a spectro-temporal receptive field, the kernel of a linear filter model describing the neuronal response to a stimulus. With a view to better understanding the tuning properties of these cells, the receptive fields of neurons in the zebra finch auditory fore-brain are compared to a set of artificial kernels generated under the assumption of sparseness; that is, the assumption that in the sensory pathway only a small number of neurons need be highly active at any time. The sparse kernels are calculated by finding a sparse basis for a corpus of zebra-finch songs. This calculation is complicated by the highly-structured nature of the songs and requires regularization. The sparse kernels and the receptive fields, though differing in some respects, display several significant similarities, which are described by computing quantative properties such as the seperability index and Q-factor. By comparison, an identical calculation performed on human speech recordings yields a set of kernels which exhibit widely different tuning. These findings imply that Field L neurons are specifically adapted to sparsely encode birdsong and supports the idea that sparsification may be an important element of early sensory processing.

[1]  J. W. Tukey,et al.  The Measurement of Power Spectra from the Point of View of Communications Engineering , 1958 .

[2]  M. Konishi,et al.  Tonotopic organization in the avian telencephalon , 1976, Brain Research.

[3]  D. Margoliash Acoustic parameters underlying the responses of song-specific neurons in the white-crowned sparrow , 1983, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[4]  A. Aertsen,et al.  Prediction of the responses of auditory neurons in the midbrain of the grass frog based on the spectro-temporal receptive field , 1983, Hearing Research.

[5]  J. P. Jones,et al.  The two-dimensional spatial structure of simple receptive fields in cat striate cortex. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  H. Scheich,et al.  Functional organization of the avian auditory cortex analogue. I. Topographic representation of isointensity bandwidth , 1991, Brain Research.

[7]  H. Scheich,et al.  Functional organization of the avian auditory cortex analogue. II. Topographic distribution of latency , 1991, Brain Research.

[8]  David J. Field,et al.  What Is the Goal of Sensory Coding? , 1994, Neural Computation.

[9]  David J. Field,et al.  Emergence of simple-cell receptive field properties by learning a sparse code for natural images , 1996, Nature.

[10]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  The “independent components” of natural scenes are edge filters , 1997, Vision Research.

[11]  M. Merzenich,et al.  Optimizing sound features for cortical neurons. , 1998, Science.

[12]  A. Doupe,et al.  Temporal and Spectral Sensitivity of Complex Auditory Neurons in the Nucleus HVc of Male Zebra Finches , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  K. Sen,et al.  Spectral-temporal Receptive Fields of Nonlinear Auditory Neurons Obtained Using Natural Sounds , 2022 .

[14]  J L Gallant,et al.  Sparse coding and decorrelation in primary visual cortex during natural vision. , 2000, Science.

[15]  K. Sen,et al.  Feature analysis of natural sounds in the songbird auditory forebrain. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  J. Gallant,et al.  Estimating spatio-temporal receptive fields of auditory and visual neurons from their responses to natural stimuli. , 2001, Network.

[17]  Michael S. Lewicki,et al.  Efficient coding of natural sounds , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[18]  Bruno A Olshausen,et al.  Sparse coding of sensory inputs , 2004, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[19]  C. Müller,et al.  Feature extraction and tonotopic organization in the avian auditory forebrain , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[20]  A. Aertsen,et al.  The Spectro-Temporal Receptive Field , 1981, Biological Cybernetics.

[21]  Christian K. Machens,et al.  Linearity of Cortical Receptive Fields Measured with Natural Sounds , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  Anne Hsu,et al.  Tuning for spectro-temporal modulations as a mechanism for auditory discrimination of natural sounds , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[23]  R. Baddeley,et al.  Is the early visual system optimised to be energy efficient? , 2005, Network.

[24]  Michael S. Lewicki,et al.  Efficient auditory coding , 2006, Nature.

[25]  Joseph J Atick,et al.  Could information theory provide an ecological theory of sensory processing? , 2011, Network.

[26]  Y. Takane,et al.  Generalized Inverse Matrices , 2011 .