Burrow architecture and burrowing dynamics of Ctenomys in foredunes and paleoenvironmental implications

Abstract Ctenomys sp., also known as tuco-tuco, is a solitary subterranean small rodent that inhabits sandy soils in South America. We studied burrow system architecture of Ctenomys flamarioni communities from the foredunes of the Southern Brazil Coastal Plain by inserting plaster of Paris and excavating the tunnels. The structure of the burrow system is complex with interlinked tunnels, one occasionally open entrance, multiple chambers and turnarounds, blind laterals, varying slopes, T-junctions, bifurcations, and two different levels. A specific isolated chamber is used as a latrine, while another is used as a nest. The burrow entrance is open only when the rodent is taking out sand or feeding. The tunnels have an average depth of 35 cm (deepest at 55 cm and the most superficial at 15 cm near the entrance). The average burrow length ranges from 190 to 500 cm. The tunnels have different heights and widths varying from 5.5–9.3 cm wide to 6–11 cm high. The entrance is inclined ~ 28°. The central part of the burrow system has a steeper slope, with an inclination of ~ 38°. The plaster molds preserve claw marks of four digits of up to 4 mm in depth. Collapsed burrows are rapidly sealed to avoid the entrance of predators. Ctenomys sp. burrows provide a suitable microhabitat, which is used by the animals as protection from adverse environmental conditions, particularly during the winter when wind impacts the coastal area. The extensive interlinking tunnels provide underground routes to escape from predators. Ctenomys burrows in coastal dune environments are appreciably more complex than those excavated in arid environments, which are shallower with no chambers and a slope of up to 20°. Such difference in the architecture of the burrows can be used as a criterion to reconstruct the paleoenvironment of burrow systems in the rock record.

[1]  D. Verzi,et al.  Review and analysis of the radiation of the south American Hystricognathi (Mammalia, Rodentia) , 1999 .

[2]  D. Loope.  Life Beneath the Surfaces of Active Jurassic Dunes: Burrows from the Entrada Sandstone of South-Central Utah , 2008 .

[3]  V. Zlotnik,et al.  Jurassic earthquake sequence recorded by multiple generations of sand blows, Zion National Park, Utah , 2013 .

[4]  E. C. Olson,et al.  Permo-Carboniferous Fresh Water Burrows , 2015 .

[5]  S. Dillenburg,et al.  Barrier evolution and placer formation at Bujuru southern Brazil , 2004 .

[6]  A. Kinlaw,et al.  A review of burrowing by semi-fossorial vertebrates in arid environments , 1999 .

[7]  Craig R. White,et al.  The allometry of burrow geometry , 2005 .

[8]  T. Freitas,et al.  Bottlenecks and Dispersal in the Tuco-Tuco das Dunas, Ctenomys flamarioni (Rodentia: Ctenomyidae), in Southern Brazil , 2007 .

[9]  M. Maun.  Burial of Plants as a Selective Force in Sand Dunes , 2008 .

[10]  R. Joeckel,et al.  EXCEPTIONALLY WELL PRESERVED LATEST MIOCENE (HEMPHILLIAN) RODENT BURROWS FROM THE EASTERN GREAT PLAINS, UNITED STATES, AND A REVIEW OF THE BURROWS OF NORTH AMERICAN RODENTS , 2014 .

[11]  G. Polis,et al.  Burrowing biology and spatial distribution of desert scorpions , 1986 .

[12]  P. Hesp.  Foredunes and blowouts: initiation, geomorphology and dynamics , 2002 .

[13]  S. Dillenburg,et al.  SIGNIFICANCE OF PRESENT-DAY COASTAL EROSION AND MARINE TRANSGRESSION, RIO GRANDE DO SUL, SOUTHERN BRAZIL , 1998 .

[14]  Professor Dr. Avinoam Danin.  Plants of Desert Dunes , 1996, Adaptations of Desert Organisms.

[15]  J. Milàn,et al.  Dinosaur Tectonics: A Structural Analysis of Theropod Undertracks with a Reconstruction of Theropod Walking Dynamics , 2007, The Journal of Geology.

[16]  F. Videla,et al.  Architecture of Ctenomys mendocinus (Rodentia) burrows from two habitats differing in abundance and complexity of vegetation , 2000 .

[17]  J. Genise,et al.  Pink fairy armadillo meniscate burrows and ichnofabrics from Miocene and Holocene interdune deposits of Argentina: Palaeoenvironmental and palaeoecological significance , 2012 .

[18]  T. R. D. de Freitas,et al.  MICROSATELLITE ANALYSIS OF A HYBRID ZONE BETWEEN CHROMOSOMALLY DIVERGENT POPULATIONS OF CTENOMYS MINUTUS FROM SOUTHERN BRAZIL (RODENTIA: CTENOMYIDAE) , 2004 .

[19]  J. E. Bowers.  The plant ecology of inland dunes in western North America , 1982 .

[20]  A. Vassallo.  ACQUISITION OF SUBTERRANEAN HABITS IN TUCO-TUCOS (RODENTIA, CAVIOMORPHA, CTENOMYS): ROLE OF SOCIAL TRANSMISSION , 2006 .

[21]  P. Dentzien-Dias,et al.  Taphonomy and paleoecology inferences of vertebrate ichnofossils from Guará Formation (Upper Jurassic), southern Brazil , 2008 .

[22]  Roger M. H. Smith,et al.  Helical burrow casts of therapsid origin from the Beaufort Group (Permian) of South Africa , 1987 .

[23]  U. Seeliger.  Coastal Foredunes of Southern Brazil: Physiography, Habitats, and Vegetation , 1992 .

[24]  D. Loope,et al.  Preservation and Erosion of Theropod Tracks in Eolian Deposits: Examples from the Middle Jurassic Entrada Sandstone, Utah, U.S.A. , 2007, The Journal of Geology.

[25]  Deb Bennett,et al.  The burrows of the miocene beaver palaeocastor, Western Nebraska, U.S.A , 1977 .

[26]  D. Loope.  Burrows Dug by Large Vertebrates into Rain‐Moistened Middle Jurassic Sand Dunes , 2006, The Journal of geology.

[27]  M. Lockley,et al.  Dinosaur Tracks and Other Fossil Footprints of the Western United States , 1999 .

[28]  M. Lockley,et al.  Small Theropod Track Assemblages from Middle Jurassic Eolianites of Eastern Utah: Paleoecological Insights from Dune Ichnofacies in a Transgressive Sequence , 2007 .

[29]  S. C. Smith,et al.  Burrows and burrowing behavior by mammals , 1990 .

[30]  D. Wedin,et al.  CLUES TO THE MEDIEVAL DESTABILIZATION OF THE NEBRASKA SAND HILLS, USA, FROM ANCIENT POCKET GOPHER BURROWS , 2009 .

[31]  T. Freitas.  Cytogenetics Status of Four Ctenomys Species in the South of Brazil , 2005, Genetica.

[32]  R. Bromley,et al.  Ichnofacies of an Ancient Erg: A Climatically Influenced Trace Fossil Association in the Jurassic Navajo Sandstone, Southern Utah, USA , 2007 .

[33]  T. Freitas,et al.  Skull shape and size variation in Ctenomys minutus (Rodentia: Ctenomyidae) in geographical, chromosomal polymorphism, and environmental contexts , 2010 .

[34]  J. Laundré,et al.  EFFECTS OF SOIL STRUCTURE ON BURROW CHARACTERISTICS OF FIVE SMALL MAMMAL SPECIES , 1993 .

[35]  M. Maun.  The Biology of Coastal Sand Dunes , 2009 .

[36]  L. J. Tomazelli,et al.  Geology of the Rio Grande do Sul Coastal Province , 1986 .

[37]  P. Hesp,et al.  Mid to late Holocene evolution of transgressive dunefields from Rio Grande do Sul coast, southern Brazil , 2008 .