Why Do People Comply with the Law? Legitimacy and the Influence of Legal Institutions

This paper extends Tyler’s procedural justice model of public compliance with the law. Analysing data from a national probability sample of adults in England and Wales, we present a new conceptualisation of legitimacy based not just on the recognition of power but also the justification of power. We find that people accept the police’s right to dictate appropriate behaviour, not only when they feel a duty to obey officers, but also when they believe that the institution acts according to a shared moral purpose with citizens. Highlighting a number of different routes by which institutions can influence citizen behaviour, our broader normative model provides a better framework for explaining why people are willing to comply with the law.

[1]  T. Jones.  The politics of the police , 2012 .

[2]  Ben Bradford,et al.  Can police enhance public confidence by improving quality of service? Results from two surveys in England and Wales , 2012 .

[3]  B. Bradford,et al.  Just Authority?: Trust in the Police in England and Wales , 2012 .

[4]  T. R. Kochel.  Can Police Legitimacy Promote Collective Efficacy? , 2012 .

[5]  G. Pearson,et al.  Keeping the Peace: Social identity, procedural justice and the policing of football crowds , 2012 .

[6]  Justice Tankebe,et al.  Beyond Procedural Justice: A Dialogic Approach to Legitimacy in Criminal Justice , 2012 .

[7]  Kristina Murphy,et al.  Understanding Cooperation With Police in a Diverse Society , 2012 .

[8]  Jacinta M. Gau,et al.  The Convergent and Discriminant Validity of Procedural Justice and Police Legitimacy: An Empirical Test of Core Theoretical Propositions , 2011 .

[9]  D. Weisburd,et al.  The Effects of Security Threats on Antecedents of Police Legitimacy , 2011 .

[10]  Lora M. Levett,et al.  Caught in Their Own Speed Trap , 2011 .

[11]  Tom R. Tyler,et al.  Trust and legitimacy: Policing in the USA and Europe , 2011 .

[12]  M. Hough,et al.  Developing European indicators of trust in justice , 2011 .

[13]  B. Bradford.  Voice, neutrality and respect: Use of Victim Support services, procedural fairness and confidence in the criminal justice system , 2011 .

[14]  Stephen J. Schulhofer,et al.  American Policing at a Crossroads: Unsustainable Policies and the Procedural Justice Alternative , 2011 .

[15]  M. Hough,et al.  Compliance with the Law and Policing by Consent: Notes on Police and Legal Legitimacy , 2010 .

[16]  David M. Mayer,et al.  Cooperating when "you" and "I" are treated fairly: the moderating role of leader prototypicality. , 2010, Journal of Applied Psychology.

[17]  Tom R. Tyler,et al.  Why People Cooperate: The Role of Social Motivations , 2010 .

[18]  M. Hough,et al.  Procedural Justice, Trust, and Institutional Legitimacy , 2010 .

[19]  Bruce A. Jacobs,et al.  DETERRENCE AND DETERRABILITY , 2010 .

[20]  Rodney K. Brunson,et al.  Procedural Justice and Order Maintenance Policing: A Study of Inner‐City Young Men’s Perceptions of Police Legitimacy , 2010 .

[21]  Clemens Kroneberg,et al.  The interplay of moral norms and instrumental incentives in crime causation , 2010 .

[22]  Justice Tankebe,et al.  PUBLIC COOPERATION WITH THE POLICE IN GHANA: DOES PROCEDURAL FAIRNESS MATTER?* , 2009 .

[23]  Americus Reed,et al.  Testing a social-cognitive model of moral behavior: the interactive influence of situations and moral identity centrality. , 2009, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[24]  Kristina Murphy,et al.  Nurturing regulatory compliance: Is procedural justice effective when people question the legitimacy of the law? , 2009 .

[25]  Michael D. Reisig,et al.  Procedural Justice, Police Legitimacy, and Helping the Police Fight Crime , 2009 .

[26]  Elizabeth A. Stanko,et al.  Contact and confidence: revisiting the impact of public encounters with the police , 2009 .

[27]  Steven L. Blader,et al.  Testing and extending the group engagement model: linkages between social identity, procedural justice, economic outcomes, and extrarole behavior. , 2009, The Journal of applied psychology.

[28]  R. Purc-Stephenson,et al.  Reporting practices in confirmatory factor analysis: an overview and some recommendations. , 2009, Psychological methods.

[29]  T. Tom.  Psychology and Institutional Design , 2008 .

[30]  Helen Wells,et al.  THE TECHNO-FIX VERSUS THE FAIR COP: PROCEDURAL (IN)JUSTICE AND AUTOMATED SPEED LIMIT ENFORCEMENT , 2008 .

[31]  F. McNeill,et al.  Exploring the dynamics of compliance with community penalties , 2008 .

[32]  J. Tankebe.  Policing and legitimacy in a post-colonial democracy : a theoretical and empirical study of Ghana , 2008 .

[33]  Tom R. Tyler,et al.  Legitimacy and Cooperation: Why Do People Help the Police Fight Crime in Their Communities? , 2010 .

[34]  Michael D. Reisig,et al.  The Construct Validity and Refinement of Process-Based Policing Measures , 2007 .

[35]  A. Liebling,et al.  Values, Practices, and Outcomes in Public and Private Sector Corrections , 2007 .

[36]  J. Jackson,et al.  Public Confidence in Policing: A Neo-Durkheimian Perspective , 2007 .

[37]  D. Smith.  New Challenges to Police Legitimacy , 2007 .

[38]  Susan A. Lentz,et al.  The invention of Peel's principles: A study of policing `textbook' history , 2007 .

[39]  S. Karstedt,et al.  The Moral Economy of Everyday Crime: Markets, Consumers and Citizens , 2006 .

[40]  P. Wikström,et al.  The Explanation of Crime: Individuals, settings, and acts of crime: situational mechanisms and the explanation of crime , 2006 .

[41]  Wesley G. Skogan,et al.  Asymmetry in the Impact of Encounters with Police , 2006 .

[42]  R. Matsueda,et al.  Deterring Delinquents: A Rational Choice Model of Theft and Violence , 2006 .

[43]  T. Tyler,et al.  Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation. , 2006, Annual review of psychology.

[44]  Travis C. Pratt,et al.  The Empirical Status of Deterrence Theory: A Meta-Analysis , 2006 .

[45]  H. Kelman,et al.  Interests, relationships, identities: three central issues for individuals and groups in negotiating their social environment. , 2006, Annual review of psychology.

[46]  G. Carlo,et al.  Identity as a Source of Moral Motivation , 2005, Human Development.

[47]  Tom R. Tyler,et al.  Managing Group Behavior: The Interplay Between Procedural Justice, Sense of Self, and Cooperation , 2005 .

[48]  D. Smit.  PRISONS AND THEIR MORAL PERFORMANCE , 2005 .

[49]  John M. Darley,et al.  Does Criminal Law Deter? A Behavioural Science Investigation , 2004 .

[50]  T. Tyler.  Enhancing Police Legitimacy , 2004 .

[51]  Steven L. Blader,et al.  The Group Engagement Model: Procedural Justice, Social Identity, and Cooperative Behavior , 2003, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[52]  Tom R. Tyler,et al.  The Role of Procedural Justice and Legitimacy in Shaping Public Support for Policing , 2003 .

[53]  T. Tyler,et al.  Moral Solidarity, Identification with the Community, and the Importance of Procedural Justice: The Police as Prototypical Representatives of a Group's Moral Values* , 2003 .

[54]  K. Aquino,et al.  Moral identity and the expanding circle of moral regard toward out-groups. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[55]  A. Doob,et al.  Sentence Severity and Crime: Accepting the Null Hypothesis , 2003, Crime and Justice.

[56]  I. Loader,et al.  Policing and the Condition of England: Memory, Politics and Culture , 2003 .

[57]  K. Aquino,et al.  The self-importance of moral identity. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[58]  Greg Pogarsky,et al.  Identifying “deterrable” offenders: Implications for research on deterrence , 2002 .

[59]  R. P. McDonald,et al.  Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. , 2002, Psychological methods.

[60]  Yuen J. Huo,et al.  Trust in the Law , 2002 .

[61]  Michael A. Hogg,et al.  A Social Identity Theory of Leadership , 2001 .

[62]  Tom R. Tyler,et al.  Cooperation in Groups: Procedural Justice, Social Identity, and Behavioral Engagement , 2000 .

[63]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[64]  Yuen J. Huo,et al.  The Self-Relevant Implications of the Group-Value Model: Group Membership, Self-Worth, and Treatment Quality , 1998 .

[65]  Daniel S. Nagin,et al.  Criminal Deterrence Research at the Outset of the Twenty-First Century , 1998, Crime and Justice.

[66]  R. Sampson,et al.  Legal Cynicism and (Subcultural?) Tolerance of Deviance: The Neighborhood Context of Racial Differences , 1998 .

[67]  Lawrence W. Sherman,et al.  Do fair procedures matter? The effect of procedural justice on spouse assault. , 1997 .

[68]  A. Bottoms,et al.  Prisons and the problem of order , 1996 .

[69]  Lawrence W. Sherman,et al.  Defiance, Deterrence, and Irrelevance: A Theory of the Criminal Sanction , 1993 .

[70]  D. Nagin,et al.  Enduring individual differences and rational choice theories of crime , 1993 .

[71]  David Beetham,et al.  The Legitimation of Power , 1991 .

[72]  Herbert C. Kelman,et al.  Crimes of Obedience , 1990 .

[73]  T. Tyler,et al.  Why People Obey the Law , 2021 .

[74]  S. Mulaik,et al.  EVALUATION OF GOODNESS-OF-FIT INDICES FOR STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELS , 1989 .

[75]  T. Tyler,et al.  The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice , 1988 .

[76]  John C. Turner,et al.  Social comparison and group interest in ingroup favouritism , 1979 .

[77]  John C. Turner,et al.  Social comparison and social identity: Some prospects for intergroup behaviour , 1975 .

[78]  C. Reith.  The Blind Eye of History : A Study of the Origins of the Present Police Era , 1975 .

[79]  E. Bittner.  The Functions of the Police in Modern Society: A Review of Background Factors, Current Practices, and Possible Role Models , 1979 .

[80]  A. Inkeles,et al.  International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. , 1968 .

[81]  D. Easton,et al.  A framework for political analysis , 1966 .

[82]  M. Banton.  The policeman in the community , 1965 .

[83]  B. Barber,et al.  A Preface to Democratic Theory , 1957 .