Comparison of Rapid Sequence Intubation Protocol Versus Conventional Intubation at the Emergency Department in Songklanagarind Hospital: A Pilot Study.

Objective: To compare the success rates, complication rates and intubation time between the diagnostic-based Rapid Sequence Intubation (RSI) protocol and conventional intubation without muscle relaxants. Materials and methods: This comparative prospective observational study was conducted at the Emergency Department in Songklanagarind Hospital from 1 April, 2008 to 30 November, 2008. Patients included were those over 18 years old who needed endotracheal intubation at the Emergency Department. The data was divided into 2 groups on consecutive periods; the pre-protocol (conventional) and post-protocol (RSI) groups. The patient’s information included sex, age, vital signs, indication for intubation, intubators, complications, intubation time and drugs used. Results: There were 45 patients; 38 patients in the conventional group and 7 patients in the RSI group. The overall success rate (intubation in term of ≤ 2 attempts) was 88.9%, without statistically significant between the groups regarding success rate and intubation time (p-value=1.000 and 0.088 respectively). The complication rate in the conventional group was significantly higher than in the RSI group (p-value= 0.047). Conclusions: This pilot study showed that the RSI had the same success rate and intubation time with the conventional intubation with fewer complications.

[1]  S. Suraseranivongse,et al.  The Thai Anesthesia Incidents Study (THAI Study) of difficult intubation: a qualitative analysis. , 2005, Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet.

[2]  R. Walls,et al.  Airway management by US and Canadian emergency medicine residents: a multicenter analysis of more than 6,000 endotracheal intubation attempts. , 2005, Annals of emergency medicine.

[3]  T. Mort,et al.  Emergency Tracheal Intubation: Complications Associated with Repeated Laryngoscopic Attempts , 2004, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[4]  C. Kam,et al.  A Study of Orotracheal Intubation in Emergency Departments of Five District Hospitals in Hong Kong , 2003 .

[5]  Ron M. Walls,et al.  Rosen's Emergency Medicine - Concepts and Clinical Practice, 2-Volume Set, 8th Edition , 2003 .

[6]  B. Debaene,et al.  Muscle relaxation and increasing doses of propofol improve intubating conditions , 2003, Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie.

[7]  S. Weiss,et al.  Predicting adverse outcomes in a diagnosis-based protocol system for rapid sequence intubation. , 2003, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[8]  S. Orebaugh.  Difficult airway management in the emergency department. , 2002, The Journal of emergency medicine.

[9]  H. Vaghadia,et al.  Tracheal intubation of outpatients with and without muscle relaxants , 2000, Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie.

[10]  J. Li,et al.  Complications of emergency intubation with and without paralysis. , 1999, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[11]  J. Sakles,et al.  Airway management in the emergency department: a one-year study of 610 tracheal intubations. , 1998, Annals of emergency medicine.

[12]  W. Reynolds,et al.  Priming with nondepolarizing relaxants for rapid tracheal intubation: a doubleblind evaluation , 1988, Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie.

[13]  P. Safar,et al.  Rapid Induction/Intubation for Prevention of Gastric‐Content Aspiration , 1970, Anesthesia and analgesia.