Exploring High-Order Functional Interactions via Structurally-Weighted LASSO Models

A major objective of brain science research is to model and quantify functional interaction patterns among neural networks, in the sense that meaningful interaction patterns reflect the working mechanisms of neural systems and represent their relationships with the external world. Most current research approaches in the neuroimaging field, however, focus on pair-wise functional/effective connectivity and are thus unable to handle high-order, network-scale functional interactions. In this paper, we propose a novel structurally-weighted LASSO (SW-LASSO) regression model to represent the functional interaction among multiple regions of interests (ROIs) based on resting state fMRI (rsfMRI) data. In particular, the structural connectivity constraints derived from diffusion tenor imaging (DTI) data are used to guide the selection of the weights, thus adaptively adjusting the penalty levels of different coefficients which correspond to different ROIs. The robustness and accuracy of our models are evaluated and demonstrated via a series of carefully designed experiments. In an application example, the generated regression graphs show different assortative mixing patterns between Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) patients and normal controls (NC). Our results indicate that the proposed model has promising potential to enable the construction of high-order functional networks and their applications in clinical datasets.

[1]  Waqas Majeed,et al.  Spatiotemporal dynamics of low frequency BOLD fluctuations in rats and humans , 2011, NeuroImage.

[2]  Nick C Fox,et al.  Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment: Structural MR Imaging Findings Predictive of Conversion to Alzheimer Disease , 2008, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[3]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Mapping directed influence over the brain using Granger causality and fMRI , 2005, NeuroImage.

[4]  Clark Glymour,et al.  Multi-subject search correctly identifies causal connections and most causal directions in the DCM models of the Smith et al. simulation study , 2011, NeuroImage.

[5]  M E J Newman Assortative mixing in networks. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[6]  Andrea B Protzner,et al.  Testing effective connectivity changes with structural equation modeling: What does a bad model tell us? , 2006, Human brain mapping.

[7]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Least angle regression , 2004, math/0406456.

[8]  Klaas E. Stephan,et al.  The anatomical basis of functional localization in the cortex , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[9]  O. Sporns,et al.  Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[10]  R. Tibshirani Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso , 1996 .

[11]  Degang Zhang,et al.  Optimization of functional brain ROIs via maximization of consistency of structural connectivity profiles , 2011, NeuroImage.

[12]  H. Zou The Adaptive Lasso and Its Oracle Properties , 2006 .

[13]  Jee Hoon Roh,et al.  Neuronal activity regulates the regional vulnerability to amyloid-β deposition , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[14]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modelling , 2003, NeuroImage.

[15]  Wei Zhu,et al.  Unified structural equation modeling approach for the analysis of multisubject, multivariate functional MRI data , 2007, Human brain mapping.

[16]  Degang Zhang,et al.  Individualized ROI Optimization via Maximization of Group-wise Consistency of Structural and Functional Profiles , 2010, NIPS.

[17]  Catie Chang,et al.  Time–frequency dynamics of resting-state brain connectivity measured with fMRI , 2010, NeuroImage.

[18]  Xiaoping Hu,et al.  Instantaneous and causal connectivity in resting state brain networks derived from functional MRI data , 2011, NeuroImage.

[19]  O Sporns,et al.  Predicting human resting-state functional connectivity from structural connectivity , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  Russell A. Poldrack,et al.  Six problems for causal inference from fMRI , 2010, NeuroImage.

[21]  Richard E. Neapolitan,et al.  Learning Bayesian networks , 2007, KDD '07.

[22]  M. Fox,et al.  Spontaneous fluctuations in brain activity observed with functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2007, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[23]  Degang Zhang,et al.  Discovering Dense and Consistent Landmarks in the Brain , 2011, IPMI.

[24]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Multivariate Autoregressive Modelling of fMRI time series , 2003 .

[25]  J. Pekar,et al.  A method for making group inferences from functional MRI data using independent component analysis , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[26]  D. Shen,et al.  DICCCOL: dense individualized and common connectivity-based cortical landmarks. , 2013, Cerebral cortex.

[27]  Edward R. Dougherty,et al.  Coefficient of determination in nonlinear signal processing , 2000, Signal Process..