Audiences in argumentation frameworks

[1]  Ch. Perelman,et al.  The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation , 1971 .

[2]  Stephen A. Cook,et al.  The Relative Efficiency of Propositional Proof Systems , 1979, Journal of Symbolic Logic.

[3]  Jules L. Coleman,et al.  Risks and Wrongs. , 1995 .

[4]  Phan Minh Dung,et al.  On the Acceptability of Arguments and its Fundamental Role in Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Logic Programming and n-Person Games , 1995, Artif. Intell..

[5]  Yannis Dimopoulos,et al.  Graph theoretical structures in logic programs and default theories , 1996 .

[6]  Phan Minh Dung,et al.  An Abstract, Argumentation-Theoretic Approach to Default Reasoning , 1997, Artif. Intell..

[7]  Dirk Vermeir,et al.  Dialectic semantics for argumentation frameworks , 1999, ICAIL '99.

[8]  Patrick Brézillon,et al.  Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence , 1999 .

[9]  Henry Prakken,et al.  Credulous and Sceptical Argument Games for Preferred Semantics , 2000, JELIA.

[10]  George C. Christie.  The Notion of an Ideal Audience in Legal Argument , 2000 .

[11]  L. Liverpool.  Two Party Immediate Response Disputes: Properties and Efficiency , 2001 .

[12]  C. Reed.  Agreeing to Differ: Modelling Persuasive Dialogue Between Parties With Different Values , 2001 .

[13]  Claudette Cayrol,et al.  Dialectical Proof Theories for the Credulous Preferred Semantics of Argumentation Frameworks , 2001, ECSQARU.

[14]  J. Searle.  Rationality in Action , 2001 .

[15]  Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon,et al.  Coherence in finite argument systems , 2002, Artif. Intell..

[16]  Claudette Cayrol,et al.  "Minimal defence": a refinement of the preferred semantics for argumentation frameworks , 2002, NMR.

[17]  Claudette Cayrol,et al.  On Decision Problems Related to the Preferred Semantics for Argumentation Frameworks , 2003, J. Log. Comput..

[18]  Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon.  Persuasion in Practical Argument Using Value-based Argumentation Frameworks , 2003, J. Log. Comput..

[19]  Claudette Cayrol,et al.  A Reasoning Model Based on the Production of Acceptable Arguments , 2002, Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence.

[20]  Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon,et al.  Justifying Practical Reasoning , 2004 .

[21]  Anthony Hunter.  Towards higher impact argumentation , 2004, NMR.

[22]  Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon,et al.  Identifying Audience Preferences in Legal and Social Domains , 2004, DEXA.

[23]  Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon,et al.  Complexity in Value-Based Argument Systems , 2004, JELIA.

[24]  Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon,et al.  Arguing about cases as practical reasoning , 2005, ICAIL '05.

[25]  Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon,et al.  Explaining preferences with argument positions , 2005, IJCAI.

[26]  Katie Atkinson,et al.  What should we do? : computational representation of persuasive argument in practical reasoning , 2005 .

[27]  Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon,et al.  Multi-Agent Argumentation for eDemocracy , 2005, EUMAS.

[28]  Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon,et al.  Persuasion and Value in Legal Argument , 2005, J. Log. Comput..

[29]  Phan Minh Dung,et al.  Dialectic proof procedures for assumption-based, admissible argumentation , 2006, Artif. Intell..

[30]  Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon,et al.  Addressing moral problems through practical reasoning , 2008, J. Appl. Log..