A Distributed Representation Approach to Group Problem Solving

Task Space Distributed Representation Space Figure 1. The framework of distributed representation for group cognitive tasks. The abstract task space, which represents the abstract structure of the task, is distributed across the representations of individuals. The Waitress and Orange Problem In this section, the framework of distributed representations for group problem solving is used to analyze the distributed representation of the Waitress and Orange problem (Zhang & Norman, 1994), which is an isomorph of the Tower of Hanoi problem (see Hayes & Simon, 1977; Kotovsky, Hayes, & Simon, 1985). Figure 2 shows the Waitress and Orange problem. The task is to move the oranges from one configuration to another, following the three rules stated in Figure 2. Figure 3 shows the problem space of this problem. Each rectangle shows one of the 27 possible configurations of the three oranges on the three plates. The lines between the rectangles show the transformations from one state to another when the three rules are followed. Figure 3 is a problem space generated by all of the three rules of the Waitress and Orange problem. In general, any subset of these three rules can generate a problem space. Figures 4 shows the problem spaces generated by Rules 1, 1+2, 1+3, and 1+2+3, respectively. Lines with arrows are uni-directional. Lines without arrows are bi-directional. One important point is that these four problem spaces can be held by different individuals. Figure 5 shows how the three rules of the Waitress and Orange problem is distributed across two individuals. Individual 1 only knows Rules 1 and 3, which generate Individual 1's problem space. Individual 2 only knows Rules 1 and 2, Group Problem Solving 4 which generate Individual 2's problem space. Although neither of the two individuals alone knows all three rules, they together know all of them. The two problem spaces of the two individuals form the distributed problem space, which is the actual space in which problem solving takes place. The distributed problem space is mapped to the abstract problem space, which is jointly determined by the combined rules of the two individuals (Rules 1, 2, and 3). Rule 1: Only one orange can be moved

[1]  J. Lanzetta,et al.  The Relationship between Certain Group Process Variables and Group Problem-Solving Efficiency , 1960 .

[2]  Piedmont Airlines,et al.  AIRCRAFT ACCIDENT REPORT , 1969 .

[3]  A P Hare,et al.  Bibliography of small group research 1959-1969. , 1972, Sociometry.

[4]  E. Ramsden Group Process and Productivity , 1973 .

[5]  J. Hackman,et al.  Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration , 1975 .

[6]  Herbert A Simon,et al.  The understanding process: Problem isomorphs , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[7]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Things that make us smart , 1979 .

[8]  A. Bandura Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[9]  H. Simon,et al.  Why are some problems hard? Evidence from Tower of Hanoi , 1985, Cognitive Psychology.

[10]  D. Wegner Transactive Memory: A Contemporary Analysis of the Group Mind , 1987 .

[11]  J. Meindl The Thinking Organization: Dynamics of Organizational Social Cognition , 1987 .

[12]  Robert L. Helmreich,et al.  Group interaction and flight crew performance , 1988 .

[13]  Edwin Hutchins,et al.  The technology of team navigation , 1990 .

[14]  Jennifer M. George,et al.  Personality, affect, and behavior in groups. , 1990 .

[15]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Cognitive artifacts , 1991 .

[16]  Richard A. Guzzo,et al.  Group performance and intergroup relations in organizations. , 1992 .

[17]  Michael D. McNeese,et al.  Computer-supported collaborative work: a new agenda for human factors engineering , 1992, Proceedings of the IEEE 1992 National Aerospace and Electronics Conference@m_NAECON 1992.

[18]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Cognitive science in the cockpit , 1993 .

[19]  S. Mohammed,et al.  Team Mental Model: Construct or Metaphor? , 1994 .

[20]  Jiajie Zhang,et al.  Representations in Distributed Cognitive Tasks , 1994, Cogn. Sci..

[21]  D. Norman,et al.  A representational analysis of numeration systems , 1995, Cognition.

[22]  Edwin Hutchins,et al.  How a Cockpit Remembers Its Speeds , 1995, Cogn. Sci..

[23]  Jiajie Zhang,et al.  A representational analysis of relational information displays , 1996, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[24]  Pluribus Unum,et al.  National Transportation Safety Board , 1996 .