How Much Ad Viewability is Enough? The Effect of Display Ad Viewability on Advertising Effectiveness

A large share of all online display advertisements (ads) are never seen by a human. For instance, an ad could appear below the page fold, where a user never scrolls. Yet, an ad is essentially ineffective if it is not at least somewhat viewable. Ad viewability - which refers to the pixel percentage-in-view and the exposure duration of an online display ad - has recently garnered great interest among digital advertisers and publishers. However, we know very little about the impact of ad viewability on advertising effectiveness. We work to close this gap by analyzing a large-scale observational data set with more than 350,000 ad impressions similar to the data sets that are typically available to digital advertisers and publishers. This analysis reveals that longer exposure durations (>10 seconds) and 100% visible pixels do not appear to be optimal in generating view-throughs. The highest view-through rates seem to be generated with relatively lower pixel/second-combinations of 50%/1, 50%/5, 75%/1, and 75%/5. However, this analysis does not account for user behavior that may be correlated with or even drive ad viewability and may therefore result in endogeneity issues. Consequently, we manipulated ad viewability in a randomized online experiment for a major European news website, finding the highest ad recognition rates among relatively higher pixel/second-combinations of 75%/10, 100%/5 and 100%/10. Everything below 75\% or 5 seconds performs worse. Yet, we find that it may be sufficient to have either a long exposure duration or high pixel percentage-in-view to reach high advertising effectiveness. Our results provide guidance to advertisers enabling them to establish target viewability rates more appropriately and to publishers who wish to differentiate their viewability products.

[1]  Michel Wedel,et al.  Contributions to attention based marketing: Foundations, insights, and challenges , 2020 .

[2]  R. Grover The Handbook of Marketing Research: Uses, Misuses, and Future Advances , 2006 .

[3]  Chong Wang,et al.  Viewability Prediction for Online Display Ads , 2015, CIKM.

[4]  Navdeep S. Sahni Effect of temporal spacing between advertising exposures: Evidence from online field experiments , 2015 .

[5]  R. Richardson A Comparison of Approaches , 2016 .

[6]  Henry E. Kyburg,et al.  Comparison of Approaches , 1974 .

[7]  Catherine E. Tucker,et al.  When Does Retargeting Work? Information Specificity in Online Advertising , 2013 .

[8]  Oliver J. Rutz,et al.  Does banner advertising affect browsing for brands? clickstream choice model says yes, for some , 2012 .

[9]  Brett R. Gordon,et al.  Field studies of psychologically targeted ads face threats to internal validity , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  Werner Reinartz,et al.  The path to purchase and attribution modeling: Introduction to special section , 2016 .

[11]  David Bounie,et al.  Advertising Viewability in Online Branding Campaigns , 2016 .

[12]  Chong Wang,et al.  Webpage Depth Viewability Prediction Using Deep Sequential Neural Networks , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[13]  Jun Wang,et al.  An Empirical Study on Display Ad Impression Viewability Measurements , 2015, ArXiv.

[14]  Chong Wang,et al.  Probabilistic Models for Ad Viewability Prediction on the Web , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[15]  Pradeep K. Chintagunta,et al.  The Effect of Banner Advertising on Internet Purchasing , 2006 .

[16]  Brett R. Gordon,et al.  A Comparison of Approaches to Advertising Measurement: Evidence from Big Field Experiments at Facebook , 2018, Mark. Sci..

[17]  Michel Wedel,et al.  Ad Gist: Ad Communication in a Single Eye Fixation , 2012, Mark. Sci..

[18]  Avi Goldfarb,et al.  Online Display Advertising: Targeting and Obtrusiveness , 2011, Mark. Sci..

[19]  R. Preston McAfee,et al.  The effects of exposure time on memory of display advertisements , 2011, EC '11.

[20]  R. Pieters,et al.  Thin Slice Impressions: How Advertising Evaluation Depends on Exposure Duration , 2016 .

[21]  Chong Wang,et al.  Viewability prediction for display advertising , 2017 .

[22]  Justin M. Rao,et al.  The Unfavorable Economics of Measuring the Returns to Advertising , 2014 .

[23]  Foster J. Provost,et al.  Measuring Causal Impact of Online Actions via Natural Experiments: Application to Display Advertising , 2015, KDD.

[24]  Terry L. Childers,et al.  Picture-Word Consistency and the Elaborative Processing of Advertisements , 1987 .

[25]  Carl F. Mela,et al.  Online Display Advertising Markets: A Literature Review and Future Directions , 2019, Inf. Syst. Res..

[26]  Xiang Fang,et al.  An examination of different explanations for the mere exposure effect , 2007 .

[27]  David H. Reiley,et al.  When Less is More: Data and Power in Advertising Experiments , 2015, Mark. Sci..

[28]  Alexander Bleier,et al.  Personalized Online Advertising Effectiveness: The Interplay of What, When, and Where , 2015, Mark. Sci..

[29]  David Bounie,et al.  Do You See What I See? Ad Viewability and the Economics of Online Advertising , 2017 .

[30]  Avi Goldfarb,et al.  Standardization and the Effectiveness of Online Advertising , 2014, Manag. Sci..