Identification of Lead User Characteristics Driving the Quality of Service Innovation Ideas

Research indicates that creative ideas provide the seed for successful service innovations. However, little attention has been paid to understanding idea creation, especially for service innovations. Lead user analysis has been shown to provide the highest potential to create attractive innovation ideas. But which characteristics in lead users are important in this regard is still under-researched. In the realm of an idea contest, we examine the impact of specific lead user characteristics in driving the quality of service innovation ideas. Our study broadens the understanding of which customers are suitable and should be activated for service innovation idea contests. Using the data of 120 ideas resulting from an idea contest for new online services of soccer clubs, our findings demonstrate that specific lead user characteristics affect the quality of service ideas generated. We find that dissatisfaction with existing services has the highest impact on idea quality. Thus, companies should make use of their complaint management database to invite dissatisfied users to participate in idea contests. The results also show that highly experienced users provide ideas of higher quality. Our findings imply that companies should design closed-membership idea contests so that only people who show specific characteristics can be admitted.

[1]  Philippe Duverger,et al.  Variety is the Spice of Innovation: Mediating Factors in the Service Idea Generation Process , 2012 .

[2]  Christoph Hienerth,et al.  Exploring How Peer Communities Enable Lead User Innovations to Become Standard Equipment in the Industry: Community Pull Effects , 2011 .

[3]  Amitava Chattopadhyay,et al.  Facilitating and Rewarding Creativity during New Product Development , 2011 .

[4]  J. Füller,et al.  Why Co‐Creation Experience Matters? Creative Experience and its Impact on the Quantity and Quality of Creative Contributions , 2011 .

[5]  Kathrin M. Möslein,et al.  Innovation Contests , 2011, Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng..

[6]  Kurt Matzler,et al.  Communitition: The Tension between Competition and Collaboration in Community-Based Design Contests , 2011 .

[7]  Irma Borst.  Understanding Crowdsourcing: Effects of motivation and rewards on participation and performance in voluntary online activities , 2010 .

[8]  Mats Magnusson,et al.  Ideation Capabilities for Continuous Innovation , 2010 .

[9]  A. Bullinger,et al.  Community-Based Innovation Contests: Where Competition Meets Cooperation , 2010 .

[10]  Jung-ki Lee.  Perceived power imbalance and customer dissatisfaction , 2010 .

[11]  Kathrin M. Möslein,et al.  Open Evaluation: ein IT-basierter Ansatz für die Bewertung innovativer Konzepte , 2010, HMD Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik.

[12]  Peter R. Magnusson,et al.  Tuning Users' Innovativeness During Ideation , 2010 .

[13]  J. Füller.  Refining Virtual Co-Creation from a Consumer Perspective , 2010 .

[14]  Mary Jo Bitner,et al.  Moving Forward and Making a Difference: Research Priorities for the Science of Service , 2010 .

[15]  Jan Marco Leimeister,et al.  Does Collaboration among Participants Lead to Better Ideas in IT-Based Idea Competitions? An Empirical Investigation , 2010, 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[16]  Johann Füller,et al.  Consumer Empowerment Through Internet-Based Co-creation , 2009, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[17]  M. Magnusson,et al.  Where Do Good Innovation Ideas Come From? Exploring the Influence of Network Connectivity on Innovation Idea Quality , 2009 .

[18]  H. Krcmar,et al.  Community Engineering for Innovations: The Ideas Competition as a Method to Nurture a Virtual Community for Innovations , 2009 .

[19]  Peter R. Magnusson,et al.  Exploring the Contributions of Involving Ordinary Users in Ideation of Technology‐Based Services* , 2009 .

[20]  Jan Marco Leimeister,et al.  Leveraging Crowdsourcing: Activation-Supporting Components for IT-Based Ideas Competition , 2009, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[21]  Johann Füller,et al.  Avatar-based innovation: Using virtual worlds for real-world innovation , 2009 .

[22]  M. Lorenzen.  Creativity in context : Content, cost, chance and collection in the organization of the film industry , 2009 .

[23]  Volker Bilgram,et al.  User-Centric Innovations in New Product Development - Systematic Identification of Lead Users Harnes , 2008 .

[24]  Yi Xu,et al.  Innovation Contests, Open Innovation, and Multiagent Problem Solving , 2008, Manag. Sci..

[25]  Jonas Matthing,et al.  Key strategies for the successful involvement of customers in the co‐creation of new technology‐based services , 2008 .

[26]  Christopher Lettl,et al.  A Social Network Perspective of Lead Users and Creativity: An Empirical Study among Children , 2008 .

[27]  Jan Marco Leimeister,et al.  Leveraging the Wisdom of Crowds: Designing an IT-Supported Ideas Competition for an ERP Software Company , 2008, Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008).

[28]  Reinhard Prügl,et al.  Extending Lead User Theory: Antecedents and Consequences of Consumers' Lead Userness , 2007 .

[29]  Christopher Lettl,et al.  User involvement competence for radical innovation , 2007 .

[30]  Reinhard Prügl,et al.  Lead users and the adoption and diffusion of new products: Insights from two extreme sports communities , 2006 .

[31]  Thomas Lee Rodgers,et al.  Identifying Quality, Novel, and Creative Ideas: Constructs and Scales for Idea Evaluation , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[32]  Edmund A. Mennis.  The Wisdom of Crowds: Why the Many Are Smarter than the Few and How Collective Wisdom Shapes Business, Economies, Societies, and Nations , 2006 .

[33]  Olivier Toubia.  Idea Generation, Creativity, and Incentives , 2006 .

[34]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  Developing successful technology‐based services: the issue of identifying and involving innovative users , 2006 .

[35]  Karim Lakhani,et al.  Broadcast Search in Problem Solving: Attracting Solutions From the Periphery , 2006, 2006 Technology Management for the Global Future - PICMET 2006 Conference.

[36]  E. von Hippel,et al.  Efficient Identification of Leading-Edge Expertise: Screening vs. Pyramiding , 2006, 2006 Technology Management for the Global Future - PICMET 2006 Conference.

[37]  Karim Lakhani,et al.  Student Paper Award Winner; "Broadcast Search in Problem Solving: Attracting Solutions From the Periphery" , 2006, 2006 Technology Management for the Global Future - PICMET 2006 Conference.

[38]  Dominik Walcher,et al.  Toolkits for Idea Competitions: A Novel Method to Integrate Users in New Product Development , 2006 .

[39]  Frank Huber,et al.  Varianz- und kovarianzbasierte Strukturgleichungsmodelle — Ein Leitfaden zu deren Spezifikation, Schätzung und Beurteilung , 2006 .

[40]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Strategy making in novel and complex worlds: the power of analogy , 2005 .

[41]  Cornelius Herstatt,et al.  User-innovators and "local" information: The case of mountain biking , 2005 .

[42]  Eric von Hippel,et al.  Finding Commercially Attractive User Innovations: A Test of Lead User Theory , 2005 .

[43]  Eric von Hippel,et al.  Democratizing innovation: The evolving phenomenon of user innovation , 2005 .

[44]  Cornelius Herstatt,et al.  The Lead User Method: An Outline of Empirical Findings and Issues for Future Research , 2004 .

[45]  Christian Lüthje.  Characteristics of innovating users in a consumer goods field , 2004 .

[46]  B. Tether,et al.  The sources and aims of innovation in services: Variety between and within sectors , 2003 .

[47]  Peter R. Magnusson,et al.  Managing User Involvement in Service Innovation , 2003 .

[48]  Gary L. Lilien,et al.  Performance Assessment of the Lead User Idea-Generation Process for New Product Development , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[49]  I. Alam.  An exploratory investigation of user involvement in new service development , 2002 .

[50]  Peter R. Magnusson,et al.  Users as a Hidden Resource for Creativity: Findings from an Experimental Study on User Involvement , 2002 .

[51]  D. Dahl,et al.  The Influence and Value of Analogical Thinking during New Product Ideation , 2002 .

[52]  Eric von Hippel,et al.  Satisfying Heterogeneous User Needs Via Innovation Toolkits: The Case of Apache Security Software , 2002 .

[53]  R. Eisenberger,et al.  Incremental effects of reward on creativity. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[54]  H. Winklhofer,et al.  Index Construction with Formative Indicators: An Alternative to Scale Development , 2001 .

[55]  Pamela D. Morrison,et al.  Determinants of User Innovation and Innovation Sharing in a Local Market , 2000 .

[56]  W D Pierce,et al.  Effects of reward on intrinsic motivation--negative, neutral and positive: comment on Deci, Koestner, and Ryan (1999) , 1999, Psychological bulletin.

[57]  M. Porter.  Clusters and the new economics of competition. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[58]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  How to kill creativity. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[59]  R. Eisenberger,et al.  Reward, intrinsic interest, and creativity: New findings. , 1998 .

[60]  Lawrence M. Wein,et al.  Economics of Product Development by Users: the Impact of Sticky Local Information , 1998 .

[61]  J. Mullins,et al.  New Product Development in Rapidly Changing Markets: An Exploratory Study , 1998 .

[62]  Wynne W. Chin.  Issues and Opinion on Structural Equation Modeling by , 2009 .

[63]  J. Rayport,et al.  Spark innovation through empathic design. , 1997, Harvard business review.

[64]  R. Eisenberger,et al.  Detrimental effects of reward. Reality or myth? , 1996, The American psychologist.

[65]  G. R. Oldham,et al.  Employee Creativity: Personal and Contextual Factors at Work , 1996 .

[66]  J. Cameron,et al.  Reinforcement, Reward, and Intrinsic Motivation: A Meta-Analysis , 1994 .

[67]  E. Hippel.  Sticky Information and the Locus of Problem Solving: Implications for Innovation , 1994 .

[68]  R. Sternberg,et al.  Investing in Creativity , 1993 .

[69]  E. Hippel,et al.  FROM EXPERIENCE: Developing New Product Concepts Via the Lead User Method: A Case Study in a “Low-Tech” Field , 1992 .

[70]  Glen L. Urban,et al.  Lead User Analyses for the Development of New Industrial Products , 1988 .

[71]  E. Hippel,et al.  Lead users: a source of novel product concepts , 1986 .

[72]  Peter H. Bloch.  THE PRODUCT ENTHUSIAST: IMPLICATIONS FOR MARKETING STRATEGY , 1986 .

[73]  J. Zaichkowsky.  Measuring the Involvement Construct , 1985 .

[74]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[75]  Edward L. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior , 1975, Perspectives in Social Psychology.

[76]  Jacob Cohen.  A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .

[77]  Kathrin M. Möslein,et al.  An IT-Based Tool for Innovation Management , 2011 .

[78]  Pino G. Audia,et al.  Past Success and Creativity over Time: A Study of Inventors in the Hard Disk Drive Industry , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[79]  H. Chesbrough.  Why Companies Should Have Open Business Models , 2007 .

[80]  Lars Frederiksen,et al.  Why Do Users Contribute to Firm-Hosted User Communities? The Case of Computer-Controlled Music Instruments , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[81]  K. Lakhani.  Broadcast Search in Problem Solving: Attracting Solutions From the Periphery , 2006, 2006 Technology Management for the Global Future - PICMET 2006 Conference.

[82]  A. Gustafsson,et al.  Harnessing the Creative Potential among Users , 2004 .

[83]  Edward L. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination , 2004 .

[84]  James Surowiecki.  The wisdom of crowds: Why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business, economies, societies, and nations Doubleday Books. , 2004 .

[85]  Sonali K. Shah,et al.  How Communities Support Innovative Activities: An Exploration of Assistance and Sharing Among End-Users , 2003 .

[86]  Christopher Lettl,et al.  Knowledge distribution among market experts: a closer look into the efficiency of information gathering for innovation projects , 2003, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[87]  D. Harhoff,et al.  Profiting from Voluntary Information Spillovers: How Users Benefit by Freely Revealing Their Innovations , 2003 .

[88]  Christian Lüthje.  Characteristics of Innovating Users in a Consumer Goods Field: An Empirical Study of Sport-Related Product Consumers , 2002 .

[89]  Nikolaus Franke,et al.  How Communities Support Innovative Activities : An Exploration of Assistance and Sharing Among Innovative Users of Sporting Equipment , 2001 .

[90]  W D Pierce,et al.  Pervasive negative effects of rewards on intrinsic motivation: The myth continues , 2001, The Behavior analyst.

[91]  E. Deci,et al.  Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[92]  E. Deci,et al.  Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation , 2000 .

[93]  E. Deci,et al.  A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. , 1999, Psychological bulletin.

[94]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  Disruptive Technologies: Catching the Wave , 1995 .

[95]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Product Design and Development , 1995 .

[96]  Mary King Flowers,et al.  Effects of Reward on Intrinsic Motivation , 1975 .