Patient-reported outcomes at discontinuation of anti-angiogenesis therapy in the randomized trial of chemotherapy with bevacizumab for advanced cervical cancer: an NRG Oncology Group study

Introduction To describe patient-reported outcomes and toxicities at time of treatment discontinuation secondary to progression or toxicities in advanced/recurrent cervical cancer patients receiving chemotherapy with bevacizumab. Methods Summarize toxicity, grade, and health-related quality of life within 1 month of treatment discontinuation for women receiving chemotherapy with bevacizumab in GOG240. Results Of the 227 patients who received chemotherapy with bevacizumab, 148 discontinued study protocol treatment (90 for disease progression and 58 for toxicity). The median survival time from treatment discontinuation to death was 7.9 months (95% CI 5.0 to 9.0) for those who progressed versus 12.1 months (95% CI 8.9 to 23.2) for those who discontinued therapy due to toxicities. The most common grade 3 or higher toxicities included hematologic, gastrointestinal, and pain. Some 57% (84/148) of patients completed quality of life assessment within 1 month of treatment discontinuation. Those patients who discontinued treatment due to progression had a mean decline in the FACT-Cx TOI of 3.2 points versus 2.2 in patients who discontinued therapy due to toxicity. This was a 9.9 point greater decline in the FACT-Cx TOI scores than those who discontinued treatment due to progression (95% CI 2.8 to 17.0, p=0.007). The decline in quality of life was due to worsening physical and functional well-being. Those who discontinued treatment due to toxicities had worse neurotoxicity and pain. Discussion Patients who discontinued chemotherapy with bevacizumab for toxicity experienced longer post-protocol survival but significantly greater declination in quality of life than those with progression. Future trial design should include supportive care interventions that optimize physiologic function and performance status for salvage therapies.

[1]  N. Pavlidis,et al.  Management of patients with recurrent/advanced cervical cancer beyond first line platinum regimens: Where do we stand? A literature review. , 2016, Critical reviews in oncology/hematology.

[2]  J. Thigpen,et al.  Is age a prognostic biomarker for survival among women with locally advanced cervical cancer treated with chemoradiation? An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group ancillary data analysis. , 2016, Gynecologic oncology.

[3]  K. Harrington,et al.  Nivolumab for Recurrent Squamous-Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  R. Salani,et al.  Beyond Chemotherapy: An Overview and Review of Targeted Therapy in Cervical Cancer. , 2016, Clinical therapeutics.

[5]  J. Radford Nivolumab for recurrent squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck , 2016, BDJ.

[6]  B. Monk,et al.  Prospective Validation of Pooled Prognostic Factors in Women with Advanced Cervical Cancer Treated with Chemotherapy with/without Bevacizumab: NRG Oncology/GOG Study , 2015, Clinical Cancer Research.

[7]  B. Monk,et al.  Bevacizumab for advanced cervical cancer: patient-reported outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial (NRG Oncology-Gynecologic Oncology Group protocol 240). , 2015, The Lancet. Oncology.

[8]  B. Monk,et al.  Factors Associated With Grade 3 or 4 Treatment-Related Toxicity in Women With Advanced or Recurrent Cervical Cancer: An Exploratory Analysis of NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group Trials 179 and 204 , 2015, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.

[9]  Michael W Sill,et al.  Improved survival with bevacizumab in advanced cervical cancer. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  B. Monk,et al.  Quality of life and survival in advanced cervical cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. , 2012, Gynecologic oncology.

[11]  B. Monk,et al.  Health-related quality of life outcomes associated with four cisplatin-based doublet chemotherapy regimens for stage IVB recurrent or persistent cervical cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. , 2010, Gynecologic oncology.

[12]  B. Monk,et al.  Prognostic factors for response to cisplatin-based chemotherapy in advanced cervical carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. , 2010, Gynecologic oncology.

[13]  B. Monk,et al.  Phase III trial of four cisplatin-containing doublet combinations in stage IVB, recurrent, or persistent cervical carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[14]  B. Monk,et al.  Clinical results and quality of life analysis for the MVAC combination (methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin) in carcinoma of the uterine cervix: A Gynecologic Oncology Group study. , 2006, Gynecologic oncology.

[15]  B. Monk,et al.  Quality of life outcomes from a randomized phase III trial of cisplatin with or without topotecan in advanced carcinoma of the cervix: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.