The conflict adaptation effect: It’s not just priming

Analyses of trial sequences in flanker tasks have revealed cognitive adaptation, reflected in a reduced interference effect following incompatible trials (Gratton, Coles, & Donchin, 1992). These effects have been explained on the basis of the response conflict monitoring model of Botvinick, Braver, Barch, Carter, and Cohen (2001), who proposed that preceding response conflict triggers stronger topdown control, leading to performance improvements on subsequent trials of similar context. A recent study (Mayr, Awh, & Laurey, 2003) has challenged this account, suggesting that the behavioral adaptations are confined to trial sequences of exact trial repetitions and can therefore be explained by repetition priming. Here, we present two experiments in which the sequential dependency effect was present even on trial sequences that did not involve stimulus repeats. We discuss the data with respect to the conflict-monitoring and repetition-priming accounts.

[1]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task , 1974 .

[2]  E. Donchin,et al.  Optimizing the use of information: strategic control of activation of responses. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[3]  M. Masson,et al.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[4]  S. Monsell,et al.  Costs of a predictible switch between simple cognitive tasks. , 1995 .

[5]  M. Stadler,et al.  Varieties of positive and negative priming , 1996, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[6]  M. Botvinick,et al.  Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance. , 1998, Science.

[7]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Conflict monitoring versus selection-for-action in anterior cingulate cortex , 1999, Nature.

[8]  J. Cohen,et al.  Dissociating the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortex in cognitive control. , 2000, Science.

[9]  M. Botvinick,et al.  Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. , 2001, Psychological review.

[10]  D. V. Cramon,et al.  Subprocesses of Performance Monitoring: A Dissociation of Error Processing and Response Competition Revealed by Event-Related fMRI and ERPs , 2001, NeuroImage.

[11]  M. Brass,et al.  The role of the frontal cortex in task preparation. , 2002, Cerebral cortex.

[12]  Marcel Brass,et al.  When the same response has different meanings: recoding the response meaning in the lateral prefrontal cortex , 2003, NeuroImage.

[13]  E. Awh,et al.  Conflict adaptation effects in the absence of executive control , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[14]  Gabriele Gratton,et al.  Independent control of processing strategies for different locations in the visual field , 2003, Biological Psychology.

[15]  M. Ullsperger,et al.  ERP correlates of error relevance , 2004 .

[16]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Anterior Cingulate Conflict Monitoring and Adjustments in Control , 2004, Science.