It is now possible to deliver service in a virtual environment with little or no human interaction. This environment offers the opportunity of new ways of delivering service. This paper examines some of the existing theories of service quality and service management in the context of new web-based environment. It draws on field research involving empirical measurement of service levels. Two existing theories are re-examined, the concept that automation leads to mediation between the customer and the service organisation – the “buffered core”, and the dimensions of service quality. In both cases the capabilities of the web, and the removal of direct human interaction give cause for rethinking. The research leads to the view that the web, rather than providing mediation, can provide direction connection between the customer and the service organisation. In addition, the accepted dimensions of customer service do not always fit the actual dimensions for service on the web. Finally, this paper proposes an empirically based model that is based on the proposition that developing service in a virtual environment is sequence dependent. This “sand cone” model is illustrated with an example from the
[1]
Gary W. Loveman,et al.
Putting the Service-Profit Chain to Work
,
1994
.
[2]
R B Chase,et al.
Where does the customer fit in a service operation?
,
1978,
Harvard business review.
[3]
C. Voss.
Developing an eService Strategy
,
2000
.
[4]
Anthony D. Miyazaki,et al.
Consumer Perceptions of Privacy and Security Risks for Online Shopping
,
2001
.
[5]
F. Sultan,et al.
Placing Trust at the Center of Your Internet Strategy
,
2000
.
[6]
A. Parasuraman,et al.
A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implications for Future Research
,
1985
.
[7]
A. Meyer,et al.
Lasting Improvements in Manufacturing Performance: In Search of a New Theory
,
1990
.
[8]
A. Parasuraman,et al.
SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality.
,
1988
.
[9]
J. H. Gilmore,et al.
Welcome to the experience economy.
,
1998,
Harvard business review.