Modeling relative permeability effects in gas-condensate reservoirs

Many gas condensate wells show a significant decrease in productivity once the pressure falls below the dew point pressure. This significantly decreases the productivity of very high rate gas wells in many of the world's largest hydrocarbon reservoirs. A widely accepted cause of this decrease in productivity index (PI) is the decrease in gas relative permeability due to build up of condensate in the near wellbore region. Predictions of well inflow performance require accurate models for the gas relative permeability as a function of interfacial tension (IFT) between the gas and condensate phases (actually it should be trapping number rather than IFT). Since these relative permeabilities depend on fluid composition and pressure as well as condensate and water saturations, a model is essential for both interpretation of lab data and for predictive field simulations. The key to such a gas condensate relative permeability model is the dependence of the critical condensate saturation on the capillary number or its generalization called the trapping number. We have made careful comparisons of such data with a capillary trapping model and have found that we can match these data with a simple two-parameter model. We then developed a general scheme for computing the gas and condensate relative permeabilities as a function of the capillary trapping model and with only data at low trapping number (high IFT) as input and have found good agreement with the experimental data in the literature. We then used this model and typical parameters for gas condensates in a compositional simulation study of a single well to better understand the PI behavior of the well and the significance of the condensate buildup.

[1]  K. Wit,et al.  On the Use of Model Experiments for Assessing Improved Gas-Condensate Mobility Under Near-Wellbore Flow Conditions , 1996 .

[2]  Srinivas Bette,et al.  Production Performance of a Retrograde Gas Reservoir: A Case Study of the Arun Field , 1994 .

[3]  G. L. Stegemeier MECHANISMS OF ENTRAPMENT AND MOBILIZATION OF OIL IN POROUS MEDIA , 1977 .

[4]  D. Longeron,et al.  Influence of Very Low Interfacial Tensions on Relative Permeability , 1980 .

[5]  Gary A. Pope,et al.  EFFECT OF CAPILLARY NUMBER ON THE RESIDUAL SATURATION OF A THREE-PHASE MICELLAR SOLUTION. , 1986 .

[6]  C. J. Wilson,et al.  The Effects of High-Velocity Flow and PVT Changes Near the Wellbore on Condensate Well Performance , 1997 .

[7]  M. Delshad,et al.  Trapping of Micellar Fluids in Berea Sandstone , 1990 .

[8]  Saskia M.P. Blom,et al.  The Combined Effect of Near-Critical Relative Permeability and Non-Darcy Flow on Well Impairment by Condensate Drop Out , 1998 .

[9]  B. J. Bourbiaux,et al.  Predicting gas-condensate reservoir performance: how flow parameters are altered when approaching production wells , 1996 .

[10]  Minquan Jin,et al.  A Study of Nonaqueous Phase Liquid Characterization and Surfactant Remediation , 1995 .

[11]  N. Morrow,et al.  Correlation of capillary number relationships for sandstone , 1984 .

[12]  H. Asar,et al.  Influence of interfacial tension on gas/oil relative permeability in a gas-condensate system , 1988 .

[13]  W. Boom,et al.  Experimental Evidence for Improved Condensate Mobility at Near-wellbore Flow Conditions , 1995 .

[14]  Mukul M. Sharma,et al.  Predicting gas condensate well productivity using capillary number and non-Darcy effects , 1999 .

[15]  T. G. Monger-McClure,et al.  Determination of Relative Permeability and Recovery for North Sea Gas Condensate Reservoirs , 1995 .

[16]  D. C. Morel,et al.  Experimental Determination of The Mobility of Hydrocarbon Liquids during Gas Condensate Reservoir Depletion: Three Actual Cases , 1997 .

[17]  Dinesh O. Shah,et al.  Surface Phenomena in Enhanced Oil Recovery , 1981 .

[18]  Ali Danesh,et al.  Measurement and correlation of gas condensate relative permeability by the steady-state method , 1998 .

[19]  L. Lake,et al.  Enhanced Oil Recovery , 2017 .

[20]  P. R. Filoco,et al.  Effect of Brine Salinity and Crude Oil Properties on Relative Permeabilities and Residual Saturations , 1998 .

[21]  F. Crawford,et al.  Flow of fluids through porous mediums , 1966 .

[22]  K. H. Coats AN EQUATION OF STATE COMPOSITIONAL MODEL , 1980 .

[23]  A. S. Cullick,et al.  Oil recovery by gas displacement at low interfacial tension , 1994 .

[24]  G. Jerauld General Three-Phase Relative Permeability Model for Prudhoe Bay , 1997 .

[25]  G. Pope,et al.  A higher-order finite-difference compositional simulator , 1990 .

[26]  M. S. Haniff,et al.  Relative Permeability and Low Tension Fluid Flow in Gas Condensate Systems , 1990 .

[27]  K. Sorbie,et al.  The Effect of Interfacial Tension Upon Gas-Oil Relative Permeability Measurements: Interpretation Using Pore-Scale Models , 1997 .