Kinetic Study on a Commercial Amorphous Hydrocracking Catalyst by Weighted Lumping Strategy

Hydrocracking is an important upgrading process in the petroleum refinery, and it is generally used to process feedstocks ranging from vacuum gas oil (VGO) to vacuum residue. In this work, hydrocracking of VGO using a dual functional amorphous catalyst was carried out at a pilot scale unit under the following reaction conditions: liquid hourly space velocity (LHSV) from 1 to 1.5 hr-1 and reaction temperatures of 360-440°C at the constant pressure and hydrogen to oil, 156 bar and 1780 Nm3/m3, respectively. The effluent of the reactor was characterized to dry gas, naphtha, kerosene, diesel and unconverted VGO or residue. The pilot tests demonstrated that performing experiments beyond the temperature, recommended by catalyst vendor, lead the process to unstable hydrocracking. To describe the yield of hydrocracking products a five-lump discrete lumping approach with ten reactions was proposed. At first, the kinetic model contained twenty kinetic constants which were estimated by using the conventional objective function. The estimated parameters showed that the tendency of the catalyst to convert VGO to gas and naphtha was negligible whilst rate constants for hydrocracking of VGO to middle distillates were considerably high which was compatible with the nature of amorphous hydrocracking catalysts. After evaluating the magnitude of reaction rates and eliminating the ignorable constants, the network was reduced to six reactions in which only nine parameters were needed. The predictions indicated that the latter network could fit the yield of products more acceptable as if the average absolute deviation between experimental and calculated yields was descended from 16.25% to 12.6%. Then, to have a better prediction, a weighted objective function was used in which weight factors were calculated by a proposed weighted least square expression. The results confirmed that this approach could reduce average absolute deviation of model to 10.75%, and it created a fairly even distribution of deviation between hydrocracking products.

[1]  Julius Scherzer,et al.  Hydrocracking Science and Technology , 1996 .

[2]  Richard O. Lynch,et al.  Introduction to Design and Analysis of Experiments , 1999, Technometrics.

[3]  Ajay K. Dalai,et al.  Kinetics of Bitumen‐Derived Gas Oil Upgrading Using a Commercial NiMo/Al2O3 Catalyst , 2008 .

[4]  Jasvinder Singh,et al.  Reaction pathways and product yields in mild thermal cracking of vacuum residues: A multi-lump kinetic model , 2005 .

[5]  Felipe López-Isunza,et al.  5-Lump kinetic model for gas oil catalytic cracking , 1999 .

[6]  A. K. Aboul-Gheit Hydrocracking of vacuum gas oil (VGO) for fuels production. II: Reaction kinetics , 1989 .

[7]  Reginaldo Guirardello,et al.  Hydroconversion kinetics of Marlim vacuum residue , 2005 .

[8]  K. S. Balaraman,et al.  A Four Lump Kinetic Model for the Simulation of the Hydrocracking Process , 2005 .

[9]  Murray R. Gray,et al.  Kinetics of Hydrocracking and Hydrotreating of Coker and Oilsands Gas Oils , 2003 .

[10]  Jorge Ancheyta,et al.  Kinetic modeling of hydrocracking of heavy oil fractions: A review , 2005 .

[11]  María T. Martínez,et al.  Hydrocracking of a Maya Residue. Kinetics and Product Yield Distributions , 1999 .

[12]  Arshad Ahmad,et al.  Modeling a Pilot Fixed-Bed Hydrocracking Reactor via a Kinetic Base and Neuro-Fuzzy Method , 2010 .

[13]  Arshad Ahmad,et al.  6-Lump Kinetic Model for a Commercial Vacuum Gas Oil Hydrocracker , 2010 .

[14]  T. Tatsumi,et al.  Development of heavy oil hydrocracking catalysts using amorphous silica-alumina and zeolites as catalyst supports , 2002 .

[15]  Deoki N. Saraf,et al.  Modeling of a hydrocracking reactor , 1991 .

[16]  E. C. Sanford,et al.  Mild hydrocracking of bitumen-derived coker and hydrocracker heavy gas oils: kinetics, product yields, and product properties , 1989 .

[17]  A. Marafi,et al.  A kinetic study on non-catalytic reactions in hydroprocessing Boscan crude oil , 2008 .

[18]  Margaret J. Robertson,et al.  Design and Analysis of Experiments , 2006, Handbook of statistics.

[19]  Robert A. Meyers,et al.  Handbook of Petroleum Refining Processes , 2003 .

[20]  Murray R. Gray,et al.  Lumped kinetics of hydrocracking of bitumen , 1997 .

[21]  Z. Gomzi,et al.  Testing of hydrodesulfurization process in small trickle-bed reactor , 2005 .