Nanobody Repertoires for Exposing Vulnerabilities of SARS-CoV-2

Despite the great promise of vaccines, the COVID-19 pandemic is ongoing and future serious outbreaks are highly likely, so that multi-pronged containment strategies will be required for many years. Nanobodies are the smallest naturally occurring single domain antigen binding proteins identified to date, possessing numerous properties advantageous to their production and use. We present a large repertoire of high affinity nanobodies against SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein with excellent kinetic and viral neutralization properties, which can be strongly enhanced with oligomerization. This repertoire samples the epitope landscape of the Spike ectodomain inside and outside the receptor binding domain, recognizing a multitude of distinct epitopes and revealing multiple neutralization targets of pseudoviruses and authentic SARS-CoV-2, including in primary human airway epithelial cells. Combinatorial nanobody mixtures show highly synergistic activities, and are resistant to mutational escape and emerging viral variants of concern. These nanobodies establish an exceptional resource for superior COVID-19 prophylactics and therapeutics.

[1]  L. Stamatatos,et al.  mRNA vaccination boosts cross-variant neutralizing antibodies elicited by SARS-CoV-2 infection , 2021, Science.

[2]  F. Grosveld,et al.  A conserved immunogenic and vulnerable site on the coronavirus spike protein delineated by cross-reactive monoclonal antibodies , 2021, Nature Communications.

[3]  M. Beltramello,et al.  N-terminal domain antigenic mapping reveals a site of vulnerability for SARS-CoV-2 , 2021, Cell.

[4]  A. Iafrate,et al.  Multiple SARS-CoV-2 variants escape neutralization by vaccine-induced humoral immunity , 2021, Cell.

[5]  Anna K Belford,et al.  Potent neutralizing nanobodies resist convergent circulating variants of SARS-CoV-2 by targeting novel and conserved epitopes , 2021, bioRxiv.

[6]  A. Godzik,et al.  Detection of a SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern in South Africa , 2021, Nature.

[7]  I. Chaiken,et al.  The Case for S2: The Potential Benefits of the S2 Subunit of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein as an Immunogen in Fighting the COVID-19 Pandemic , 2021, Frontiers in Immunology.

[8]  C. Schiffer,et al.  Development of potency, breadth and resilience to viral escape mutations in SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies , 2021, bioRxiv.

[9]  M. Nussenzweig,et al.  Multimeric nanobodies from camelid engineered mice and llamas potently neutralize SARS-CoV-2 variants , 2021, bioRxiv.

[10]  Y. Xiang,et al.  Potent Neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 by Hetero-Bivalent Alpaca Nanobodies Targeting the Spike Receptor-Binding Domain , 2021, Journal of Virology.

[11]  R. Rappuoli,et al.  Extremely potent human monoclonal antibodies from COVID-19 convalescent patients , 2021, Cell.

[12]  A. Iafrate,et al.  Multiple SARS-CoV-2 variants escape neutralization by vaccine-induced humoral immunity , 2021, Cell.

[13]  P. Marrack,et al.  501Y.V2 and 501Y.V3 variants of SARS-CoV-2 lose binding to Bamlanivimab in vitro , 2021, bioRxiv.

[14]  M. Nussenzweig,et al.  mRNA vaccine-elicited antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 and circulating variants , 2021, Nature.

[15]  D. Fremont,et al.  SARS-CoV-2 variants show resistance to neutralization by many monoclonal and serum-derived polyclonal antibodies , 2021, Research square.

[16]  Nicky Phillips,et al.  The coronavirus is here to stay — here’s what that means , 2021, Nature.

[17]  A. García-Sastre,et al.  The E484K mutation in the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein reduces but does not abolish neutralizing activity of human convalescent and post-vaccination sera. , 2021, medRxiv.

[18]  D. Fremont,et al.  Identification of SARS-CoV-2 spike mutations that attenuate monoclonal and serum antibody neutralization , 2021, Cell Host & Microbe.

[19]  D. Ho,et al.  Increased Resistance of SARS-CoV-2 Variants B.1.351 and B.1.1.7 to Antibody Neutralization , 2021, bioRxiv.

[20]  D. Ho,et al.  Antibody Resistance of SARS-CoV-2 Variants B.1.351 and B.1.1.7 , 2021, bioRxiv.

[21]  J. Bloom,et al.  Prospective mapping of viral mutations that escape antibodies used to treat COVID-19 , 2021, Science.

[22]  F. Giardina,et al.  Bispecific antibody prevents SARS-CoV-2 escape and protects mice from disease , 2021, bioRxiv.

[23]  L. Morris,et al.  SARS-CoV-2 501Y.V2 escapes neutralization by South African COVID-19 donor plasma , 2021, bioRxiv.

[24]  M. Beltramello,et al.  N-terminal domain antigenic mapping reveals a site of vulnerability for SARS-CoV-2 , 2021, bioRxiv.

[25]  O. Bjørnstad,et al.  Immunological characteristics govern the transition of COVID-19 to endemicity , 2021, Science.

[26]  Jonathan L. Schmid-Burgk,et al.  COVID-19 Bibliometrics 8 th – 14 th February 2021 , 2021 .

[27]  S. R. Reeves,et al.  Inactivation of Material from SARS-CoV-2-Infected Primary Airway Epithelial Cell Cultures , 2021, Methods and protocols.

[28]  J. Bloom,et al.  Comprehensive mapping of mutations to the SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding domain that affect recognition by polyclonal human serum antibodies , 2021, bioRxiv.

[29]  P. C. Seth,et al.  Structural Analysis of Neutralizing Epitopes of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike to Guide Therapy and Vaccine Design Strategies , 2021, Viruses.

[30]  D. von Laer,et al.  Comparison of Four SARS-CoV-2 Neutralization Assays , 2020, Vaccines.

[31]  H. Aghamollaei,et al.  Nanobodies, the potent agents to detect and treat the Coronavirus infections: A systematic review , 2020, Molecular and Cellular Probes.

[32]  Marco Erreni,et al.  Nanobodies as Versatile Tool for Multiscale Imaging Modalities , 2020, Biomolecules.

[33]  I. Wilson,et al.  Cross-Neutralization of a SARS-CoV-2 Antibody to a Functionally Conserved Site Is Mediated by Avidity , 2020, Immunity.

[34]  B. Chait,et al.  Native Mass Spectrometry-Based Screening for Optimal Sample Preparation in Single Particle Cryo-EM , 2020, Structure.

[35]  Ben M. Webb,et al.  Using Integrative Modeling Platform to compute, validate, and archive a model of a protein complex structure , 2020, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[36]  D. Schneidman-Duhovny,et al.  Versatile and multivalent nanobodies efficiently neutralize SARS-CoV-2 , 2020, Science.

[37]  N. Krogan,et al.  An ultrapotent synthetic nanobody neutralizes SARS-CoV-2 by stabilizing inactive Spike , 2020, Science.

[38]  C. Pierri SARS-CoV-2 spike protein: flexibility as a new target for fighting infection , 2020, Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy.

[39]  M. Nussenzweig,et al.  SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody structures inform therapeutic strategies , 2020, Nature.

[40]  N. Krogan,et al.  Bi-paratopic and multivalent VH domains block ACE2 binding and neutralize SARS-CoV-2 , 2020, Nature Chemical Biology.

[41]  D. Burton,et al.  Cross-reactive serum and memory B cell responses to spike protein in SARS-CoV-2 and endemic coronavirus infection , 2020, bioRxiv.

[42]  David J. Wooten,et al.  synergy: a Python library for calculating, analyzing and visualizing drug combination synergy , 2020, Bioinform..

[43]  S. Ziegler,et al.  Effects of Asthma and Human Rhinovirus A16 on the Expression of SARS-CoV-2 Entry Factors in Human Airway Epithelium , 2020, American journal of respiratory cell and molecular biology.

[44]  Oliver C. Grant,et al.  Analysis of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein glycan shield reveals implications for immune recognition , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[45]  J. Dye,et al.  Engineering human ACE2 to optimize binding to the spike protein of SARS coronavirus 2 , 2020, Science.

[46]  I. Wilson,et al.  Cross-neutralization of a SARS-CoV-2 antibody to a functionally conserved site is mediated by avidity , 2020, bioRxiv.

[47]  João Trigueiro-Louro,et al.  Unlocking COVID therapeutic targets: A structure-based rationale against SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV Spike , 2020, Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal.

[48]  Ilya J. Finkelstein,et al.  Structure-based design of prefusion-stabilized SARS-CoV-2 spikes , 2020, Science.

[49]  J. Sodroski,et al.  Potent neutralizing antibodies against multiple epitopes on SARS-CoV-2 spike , 2020, Nature.

[50]  C. Rice,et al.  Escape from neutralizing antibodies by SARS-CoV-2 spike protein variants , 2020, bioRxiv.

[51]  C. Rice,et al.  Measuring SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody activity using pseudotyped and chimeric viruses , 2020, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[52]  S. Rawson,et al.  Distinct conformational states of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein , 2020, Science.

[53]  E. Hartenian,et al.  The molecular virology of coronaviruses , 2020, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[54]  J. Chai,et al.  Door to the cell for COVID-19 opened, leading way to therapies , 2020, Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy.

[55]  S. Rowland-Jones,et al.  Tracking Changes in SARS-CoV-2 Spike: Evidence that D614G Increases Infectivity of the COVID-19 Virus , 2020, Cell.

[56]  Beata Turoňová,et al.  In situ structural analysis of SARS-CoV-2 spike reveals flexibility mediated by three hinges , 2020, Science.

[57]  Qiang Zhou,et al.  A neutralizing human antibody binds to the N-terminal domain of the Spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 , 2020, Science.

[58]  R. Owens,et al.  Neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 by Destruction of the Prefusion Spike , 2020, Cell Host & Microbe.

[59]  Jesse D. Bloom,et al.  Deep mutational scanning of SARS-CoV-2 receptor binding domain reveals constraints on folding and ACE2 binding , 2020, bioRxiv.

[60]  D. Burton,et al.  Isolation of potent SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies and protection from disease in a small animal model , 2020, Science.

[61]  G. Atwal,et al.  Antibody cocktail to SARS-CoV-2 spike protein prevents rapid mutational escape seen with individual antibodies , 2020, Science.

[62]  C. Rice,et al.  Convergent Antibody Responses to SARS-CoV-2 in Convalescent Individuals , 2020, Nature.

[63]  M. Diamond,et al.  Growth, detection, quantification, and inactivation of SARS-CoV-2 , 2020, Virology.

[64]  C. Rice,et al.  Measuring SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody activity using pseudotyped and chimeric viruses , 2020, bioRxiv.

[65]  Y. Li,et al.  Linear epitopes of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein elicit neutralizing antibodies in COVID-19 patients , 2020, Cellular & Molecular Immunology.

[66]  L. Stamatatos,et al.  Analysis of a SARS-CoV-2-Infected Individual Reveals Development of Potent Neutralizing Antibodies with Limited Somatic Mutation , 2020, Immunity.

[67]  C. Poh,et al.  Two linear epitopes on the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein that elicit neutralising antibodies in COVID-19 patients , 2020, Nature Communications.

[68]  M. Drebot,et al.  Two Detailed Plaque Assay Protocols for the Quantification of Infectious SARS‐CoV‐2 , 2020, Current protocols in microbiology.

[69]  X. Xie,et al.  Potent Neutralizing Antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 Identified by High-Throughput Single-Cell Sequencing of Convalescent Patients’ B Cells , 2020, Cell.

[70]  Vineet D. Menachery,et al.  Rapid Generation of Neutralizing Antibody Responses in COVID-19 Patients , 2020, Cell Reports Medicine.

[71]  F. Gao,et al.  A noncompeting pair of human neutralizing antibodies block COVID-19 virus binding to its receptor ACE2 , 2020, Science.

[72]  David I Stuart,et al.  Neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 by Destruction of the Prefusion Spike , 2020, bioRxiv.

[73]  Daniel Wrapp,et al.  Site-specific glycan analysis of the SARS-CoV-2 spike , 2020, Science.

[74]  Asif Shajahan,et al.  Deducing the N- and O-glycosylation profile of the spike protein of novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 , 2020, Glycobiology.

[75]  J. Bloom,et al.  Protocol and Reagents for Pseudotyping Lentiviral Particles with SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein for Neutralization Assays , 2020, bioRxiv.

[76]  Asif Shajahan,et al.  Deducing the N- and O-glycosylation profile of the spike protein of novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 , 2020, bioRxiv.

[77]  P. Vollmar,et al.  Virological assessment of hospitalized patients with COVID-2019 , 2020, Nature.

[78]  Linqi Zhang,et al.  Structure of the SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor-binding domain bound to the ACE2 receptor , 2020, Nature.

[79]  N. Callewaert,et al.  Structural Basis for Potent Neutralization of Betacoronaviruses by Single-Domain Camelid Antibodies , 2020, Cell.

[80]  K. Shi,et al.  Structural basis of receptor recognition by SARS-CoV-2 , 2020, Nature.

[81]  A. Walls,et al.  Structure, Function, and Antigenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Glycoprotein , 2020, Cell.

[82]  M. Letko,et al.  Functional assessment of cell entry and receptor usage for SARS-CoV-2 and other lineage B betacoronaviruses , 2020, Nature Microbiology.

[83]  Young-Jun Park,et al.  Structure, Function, and Antigenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Glycoprotein , 2020, Cell.

[84]  B. Graham,et al.  Cryo-EM structure of the 2019-nCoV spike in the prefusion conformation , 2020, Science.

[85]  Kai Zhao,et al.  A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin , 2020, Nature.

[86]  Zhènglì Shí,et al.  Potent binding of 2019 novel coronavirus spike protein by a SARS coronavirus-specific human monoclonal antibody , 2020, bioRxiv.

[87]  S. Muyldermans,et al.  The Therapeutic Potential of Nanobodies , 2019, BioDrugs.

[88]  Michael P Hantak,et al.  Evaluating MERS-CoV Entry Pathways , 2019, Methods in molecular biology.

[89]  Hao Chi,et al.  A high-speed search engine pLink 2 with systematic evaluation for proteome-scale identification of cross-linked peptides , 2019, Nature Communications.

[90]  A. Sali,et al.  Principles for Integrative Structural Biology Studies , 2019, Cell.

[91]  P. Chames,et al.  Nanobody Engineering: Toward Next Generation Immunotherapies and Immunoimaging of Cancer , 2019, Antibodies.

[92]  Jinquan Luo,et al.  Universal protection against influenza infection by a multidomain antibody to influenza hemagglutinin , 2018, Science.

[93]  S. Duggan Caplacizumab: First Global Approval , 2018, Drugs.

[94]  David L. Stokes,et al.  Integrative Structure and Functional Anatomy of a Nuclear Pore Complex , 2018, Nature.

[95]  Andrej Sali,et al.  Assessing Exhaustiveness of Stochastic Sampling for Integrative Modeling of Macromolecular Structures. , 2017, Biophysical journal.

[96]  F. Koch-Nolte,et al.  Nanobodies and Nanobody-Based Human Heavy Chain Antibodies As Antitumor Therapeutics , 2017, Front. Immunol..

[97]  S. Muyldermans,et al.  Structural evaluation of a nanobody targeting complement receptor Vsig4 and its cross reactivity. , 2017, Immunobiology.

[98]  A. Strongin,et al.  Active-site MMP-selective antibody inhibitors discovered from convex paratope synthetic libraries , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[99]  Fang Li,et al.  Structure, Function, and Evolution of Coronavirus Spike Proteins. , 2016, Annual review of virology.

[100]  David Fenyö,et al.  Optimizing selection of large animals for antibody production by screening immune response to standard vaccines. , 2016, Journal of immunological methods.

[101]  B. Chait,et al.  A Robust Workflow for Native Mass Spectrometric Analysis of Affinity-Isolated Endogenous Protein Assemblies. , 2016, Analytical chemistry.

[102]  David Fenyö,et al.  A robust pipeline for rapid production of versatile nanobody repertoires , 2014, Nature Methods.

[103]  P. Bowers,et al.  A general approach to antibody thermostabilization , 2014, mAbs.

[104]  Ruth McNerney,et al.  Emerging technologies in point-of-care molecular diagnostics for resource-limited settings , 2014, Expert review of molecular diagnostics.

[105]  Daniel R. Salomon,et al.  A Structurally Distinct Human Mycoplasma Protein that Generically Blocks Antigen-Antibody Union , 2014, Science.

[106]  Serge Muyldermans,et al.  Nanobodies: natural single-domain antibodies. , 2013, Annual review of biochemistry.

[107]  Yingda Xu,et al.  High throughput solution-based measurement of antibody-antigen affinity and epitope binning , 2013, mAbs.

[108]  Carsten Magnus,et al.  Virus Neutralisation: New Insights from Kinetic Neutralisation Curves , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[109]  B. Prabhakar,et al.  Human Monoclonal Antibodies against Highly Conserved HR1 and HR2 Domains of the SARS-CoV Spike Protein Are More Broadly Neutralizing , 2012, PloS one.

[110]  Ben M. Webb,et al.  Putting the Pieces Together: Integrative Modeling Platform Software for Structure Determination of Macromolecular Assemblies , 2012, PLoS biology.

[111]  Gaël Varoquaux,et al.  Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python , 2011, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[112]  Tjerk P. Straatsma,et al.  NWChem: A comprehensive and scalable open-source solution for large scale molecular simulations , 2010, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[113]  S. Muyldermans,et al.  General Strategy to Humanize a Camelid Single-domain Antibody and Identification of a Universal Humanized Nanobody Scaffold* , 2009, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[114]  F. Niesen,et al.  The use of differential scanning fluorimetry to detect ligand interactions that promote protein stability , 2007, Nature Protocols.

[115]  Gregory V. Bard,et al.  Spelling-Error Tolerant, Order-Independent Pass-Phrases via the Damerau-Levenshtein String-Edit Distance Metric , 2007, ACSW.

[116]  P. Carter Potent antibody therapeutics by design , 2006, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[117]  L. Wyns,et al.  Molecular basis for the preferential cleft recognition by dromedary heavy-chain antibodies. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[118]  Kelly Stefano Cole,et al.  Kinetic Rates of Antibody Binding Correlate with Neutralization Sensitivity of Variant Simian Immunodeficiency Virus Strains , 2005, Journal of Virology.

[119]  Serge Muyldermans,et al.  Nanobodies as novel agents for cancer therapy , 2005, Expert opinion on biological therapy.

[120]  C. Fraser,et al.  Factors that make an infectious disease outbreak controllable. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[121]  L. Björck,et al.  IdeS, a novel streptococcal cysteine proteinase with unique specificity for immunoglobulin G , 2002, The EMBO journal.

[122]  J. Frère,et al.  β-Lactamase Inhibitors Derived from Single-Domain Antibody Fragments Elicited in the Camelidae , 2001, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[123]  S. Zolla-Pazner,et al.  Dissociation rate of antibody-gp120 binding interactions is predictive of V3-mediated neutralization of HIV-1. , 1994, Journal of immunology.

[124]  T. Blundell,et al.  Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. , 1993, Journal of molecular biology.

[125]  A. Thomas,et al.  Relationship between poliovirus neutralization and aggregation , 1986, Journal of virology.

[126]  Y. Cheng,et al.  Relationship between the inhibition constant (K1) and the concentration of inhibitor which causes 50 per cent inhibition (I50) of an enzymatic reaction. , 1973, Biochemical pharmacology.

[127]  A. Sigal,et al.  Circulating SARS-CoV-2 variants escape neutralization by vaccine-induced humoral immunity , 2021 .

[128]  N. Krogan,et al.  An ultra-high affinity synthetic nanobody blocks SARS-CoV-2 infection by locking Spike 1 into an inactive conformation 2 , 2020 .

[129]  A. D. de Fougerolles,et al.  Nanobodies®† as inhaled biotherapeutics for lung diseases , 2017, Pharmacology & therapeutics.

[130]  Wes McKinney,et al.  Data Structures for Statistical Computing in Python , 2010, SciPy.

[131]  A. Sali,et al.  Modeling of loops in protein structures , 2000, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[132]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Estimating the number of clusters in a data set via the gap statistic , 2000 .