The effects of a driver assistance system for safe speed and safe distance - A real-life field study

The effects of a driver assistance system for keeping safe speed and safe distance (referred to as SASPENCE) on driver behaviour, reactions and acceptance were evaluated in a test carried out in 2006. Twenty test drivers, recruited by ads, drove two times (once with the system off and once with the system on) in real traffic conditions along a 50 km long test route containing urban and rural roads and motorway sections outside Turin, Italy. Driving data was logged and the test drivers were observed by means of an in-car observation method, in this case by two observers riding along in the car with the driver. Driver opinions were collected through questionnaires. The findings show positive effects of the system in terms of fewer alarm situations, shorter alarm lengths, shorter reaction times, increased headway and better interactions with vulnerable road users at intersections. On the negative side, driver performance worsened slightly, the number of centre line crossings increased, there was worse facilitating behaviour with regard to other drivers and harder braking at traffic lights. No major effect on speed behaviour of the driver, lane choice, lane keeping, lane change, overtaking, red running, use of turning indicator and workload was found.

[1]  B. Thomas,et al.  Usability Evaluation In Industry , 1996 .

[2]  Susan G. Hill,et al.  Traditional and raw task load index (TLX) correlations: Are paired comparisons necessary? In A , 1989 .

[3]  Dick de Waard,et al.  A simple procedure for the assessment of acceptance of advanced transport telematics , 1997 .

[4]  Harry Lahrmann,et al.  Intelligent speed adaptation: Development of a GPS based ISA-system and field trail of the system with 24 test drivers , 1996 .

[5]  A. Várhelyi,et al.  The effects of in-car speed limiters – Field studies , 2001 .

[6]  Samantha L Comte.  New systems: new behaviour? , 2000 .

[7]  Andras Varhelyi,et al.  Test of HMI Alternatives for Driver Support to Keep Safe Speed and Safe Distance - A Simulator Study , 2008 .

[8]  Andras Varhelyi,et al.  HMI Literature review , 2006 .

[9]  Andras Varhelyi,et al.  Developing human-machine interaction components for a driver assistance system for safe speed and safe distance , 2008 .

[10]  Andrew M. Parkes,et al.  Driving Future Vehicles , 1993 .

[11]  Matthew Robert Justin Baldock,et al.  Rear end crashes , 2005 .

[12]  Andras Varhelyi,et al.  Validation of in-car observations, a method for driver assessment , 2004 .

[13]  G. Maycock,et al.  SPEED, SPEED LIMITS AND ACCIDENTS , 1994 .

[14]  John A. Groeger.  Close, but no cigar: assessment of a headway warning device , 1998 .

[15]  Magnus Hjälmdahl,et al.  Effects of an active accelerator pedal on driver behaviour and traffic safety after long-term use in urban areas. , 2004, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[16]  Rune Elvik,et al.  The Handbook of Road Safety Measures , 2009 .

[17]  J. B. Brooke,et al.  SUS: A 'Quick and Dirty' Usability Scale , 1996 .

[18]  A. H. Jamson,et al.  Traditional and innovative speed-reducing measures for curves: an investigation of driver behaviour using a driving simulator , 2000 .

[19]  Thomas A. Dingus,et al.  HUMAN FACTORS DESIGN ISSUES FOR CRASH AVOIDANCE SYSTEMS , 1998 .

[20]  R Risser,et al.  Behavior in traffic conflict situations. , 1985, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[21]  H Godhelp,et al.  THE USE OF AN INTELLIGENT ACCELERATOR AS AN ELEMENT OF A DRIVER SUPPORT SYSTEM , 1991 .

[22]  Karel Brookhuis,et al.  Limiting speed, towards an intelligent speed adapter (ISA) , 1999 .

[23]  L Duynstee,et al.  INTELLIGENT SPEED ADAPTATION: SELECTED RESULTS OF THE DUTCH PRACTICAL TRIAL , 2001 .