Development and validation of a variance model for dynamic PET: uses in fitting kinetic data and optimizing the injected activity

The precision of biological parameter estimates derived from dynamic PET data can be limited by the number of acquired coincidence events (prompts and randoms). These numbers are affected by the injected activity (A(0)). The benefits of optimizing A(0) were assessed using a new model of data variance which is formulated as a function of A(0). Seven cancer patients underwent dynamic [(15)O]H(2)O PET scans (32 scans) using a Biograph PET-CT scanner (Siemens), with A(0) varied (142-839 MBq). These data were combined with simulations to (1) determine the accuracy of the new variance model, (2) estimate the improvements in parameter estimate precision gained by optimizing A(0), and (3) examine changes in precision for different size regions of interest (ROIs). The new variance model provided a good estimate of the relative variance in dynamic PET data across a wide range of A(0)s and time frames for FBP reconstruction. Patient data showed that relative changes in estimate precision with A(0) were in reasonable agreement with the changes predicted by the model: Pearson's correlation coefficients were 0.73 and 0.62 for perfusion (F) and the volume of distribution (V(T)), respectively. The between-scan variability in the parameter estimates agreed with the estimated precision for small ROIs (<5 mL). An A(0) of 500-700 MBq was near optimal for estimating F and V(T) from abdominal [(15)O]H(2)O scans on this scanner. This optimization improved the precision of parameter estimates for small ROIs (<5 mL), with an injection of 600 MBq reducing the standard error on F by a factor of 1.13 as compared to the injection of 250 MBq, but by the more modest factor of 1.03 as compared to A(0) = 400 MBq.

[1]  R E Carson,et al.  Noise reduction in oncology FDG PET images by iterative reconstruction: a quantitative assessment. , 2001, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[2]  Simon R. Cherry,et al.  An evaluation of exact and approximate 3-D reconstruction algorithms for a high-resolution, small-animal PET scanner , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[3]  Stefan Eberl,et al.  Optimizing injected dose in clinical PET by accurately modeling the counting-rate response functions specific to individual patient scans. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[4]  John R. Votaw,et al.  Optimization of PET activation studies based on the SNR measured in the 3-D Hoffman brain phantom , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[5]  R. Huesman A new fast algorithm for the evaluation of regions of interest and statistical uncertainty in computed tomography. , 1984, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  Julian C Matthews,et al.  Optimization of the Injected Activity in Dynamic 3D PET: A Generalized Approach Using Patient-Specific NECs as Demonstrated by a Series of 15O-H2O Scans , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[7]  M N Maisey,et al.  Optimization of noise-equivalent count rates in 3D PET. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  Chisato Kondo,et al.  Comparison of Imaging Protocols for 18F-FDG PET/CT in Overweight Patients: Optimizing Scan Duration Versus Administered Dose , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[9]  Richard E. Carson,et al.  Noise characteristics of 3-D and 2-D PET images , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[10]  P M Bloomfield,et al.  The on-line monitoring of continuously withdrawn arterial blood during PET studies using a single BGO/photomultiplier assembly and non-stick tubing. , 1991, Medical progress through technology.

[11]  E. Hoffman,et al.  Measuring PET scanner sensitivity: relating countrates to image signal-to-noise ratios using noise equivalents counts , 1990 .

[12]  G. L. Brownell,et al.  Estimation of the Local Statistical Noise in Emission Computed Tomography , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[13]  Suleman Surti,et al.  Improved Dose Regimen in Pediatric PET , 2010, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[14]  C. Watson,et al.  Count rate dependence of local signal-to-noise ratio in positron emission tomography , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[15]  I. Kanno,et al.  Error Analysis of a Quantitative Cerebral Blood Flow Measurement Using H215O Autoradiography and Positron Emission Tomography, with Respect to the Dispersion of the Input Function , 1986, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[16]  Carole Lartizien,et al.  Optimization of injected dose based on noise equivalent count rates for 2- and 3-dimensional whole-body PET. , 2002, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[17]  Roberta Matheoud,et al.  Performance characteristics obtained for a new 3-dimensional lutetium oxyorthosilicate-based whole-body PET/CT scanner with the National Electrical Manufacturers Association NU 2-2001 standard. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[18]  F. Fazio,et al.  Generation of the Acquisition-Specific NEC (AS-NEC) Curves to Optimize the Injected Dose in 3D$^18$F-FDG Whole Body PET Studies , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[19]  Peter Herscovitch,et al.  An approximation formula for the variance of PET region-of-interest values , 1993, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[20]  Peter Herscovitch,et al.  Optimization of Noninvasive Activation Studies with 15O-Water and Three-Dimensional Positron Emission Tomography , 1997, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[21]  P. R. Bevington,et al.  Data Reduction and Error Analysis for the Physical Sciences , 1969 .

[22]  D R Haynor,et al.  Resampling estimates of precision in emission tomography. , 1989, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.