Model Averaging Software for Dichotomous Dose Response Risk Estimation

Model averaging has been shown to be a useful method for incorporating model uncertainty in quantitative risk estimation. In certain circumstances this technique is computationally complex, requiring sophisticated software to carry out the computation. We introduce software that implements model averaging for risk assessment based upon dichotomous dose-response data. This software, which we call Model Averaging for Dichotomous Response Benchmark Dose (MADr-BMD), fits the quantal response models, which are also used in the US Environmental Protection Agency benchmark dose software suite, and generates a model-averaged dose response model to generate benchmark dose and benchmark dose lower bound estimates. The software fulfills a need for risk assessors, allowing them to go beyond one single model in their risk assessments based on quantal data by focusing on a set of models that describes the experimental data.

[1]  R L Kodell,et al.  Incorporating model uncertainties along with data uncertainties in microbial risk assessment. , 2000, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[2]  A. John Bailer,et al.  Comparing model averaging with other model selection strategies for benchmark dose estimation , 2009, Environmental and Ecological Statistics.

[3]  A. Raftery.  Bayesian Model Selection in Social Research , 1995 .

[4]  John E. Dennis,et al.  Algorithm 573: NL2SOL—An Adaptive Nonlinear Least-Squares Algorithm [E4] , 1981, TOMS.

[5]  G. Schwarz.  Estimating the Dimension of a Model , 1978 .

[6]  K S Crump,et al.  A new method for determining allowable daily intakes. , 1984, Fundamental and applied toxicology : official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[7]  Matthew W Wheeler,et al.  Model Uncertainty and Risk Estimation for Experimental Studies of Quantal Responses , 2005, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[8]  K. Burnham,et al.  Model selection: An integral part of inference , 1997 .

[9]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  An introduction to the bootstrap , 1993 .

[10]  J. Cavanaugh.  A large-sample model selection criterion based on Kullback's symmetric divergence , 1999 .

[11]  Brian Gough,et al.  GNU Scientific Library Reference Manual - Third Edition , 2003 .

[12]  H. Akaike.  A Bayesian analysis of the minimum AIC procedure , 1978 .

[13]  James J. Chen,et al.  Model Averaging Using the Kullback Information Criterion in Estimating Effective Doses for Microbial Infection and Illness , 2005, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[14]  T H Shepard,et al.  National toxicology program. , 1981, Teratology.

[15]  A. John Bailer,et al.  Incorporating uncertainty and variability in the assessment of occupational hazards , 2005 .

[16]  Matthew W Wheeler,et al.  Properties of Model‐Averaged BMDLs: A Study of Model Averaging in Dichotomous Response Risk Estimation , 2007, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.