Bundling strategies for complementary products in a horizontal supply chain

Purpose This paper aims to address the following problems: What are the firms’ optimal pricing and quality policies under three scenarios (no bundling, pure bundling and mixed bundling)? In what condition will one bundling strategy dominate the others? How does the degree of complementarity affect the firms’ decision? Design/methodology/approach Using the game theory, this study first establishes three models of bundling strategies: no bundling, pure bundling and mixed bundling and then obtains the optimal prices and quality decisions. This study uses numerical analysis to explore the relationships between the prices (demands and profits) and some key parameters and to obtain some valuable management complications. Findings Some interesting and valuable management implications are established: regardless of the degree of complementarity, adopting a pure bundling or mixed bundling strategy is better than separately selling an individual product; a high degree of complementarity leads to reduced profit in the no bundling and mixed bundling scenarios, whereas the condition in the pure bundling strategy is the opposite; and when the degree of complementarity is adequately large, choosing pure bundling strategy is more profitable. Research limitations/implications On the one hand, this study does not calculate the profit sharing ratio, and hence, the equilibrium profit sharing ratio can be explored in future work. On the other hand, marketing efforts (e.g. advertising and promotion) can be included in the study. Practical implications This study derives the necessary conditions for the most effective bundling strategy that maximizes firm’s profits, and these conclusions can provide a decision reference to the bundling decisions of firms. Originality/value First, the optimal bundling strategies in a horizontal supply chain consisting of two firms is considered. Under the pure and mixed bundling strategies, the two firms sell the bundled product by building a cooperative program. Second, both the pricing policies and quality decisions of supply chain members under the different bundling strategies are studied.

[1]  G. Tellis,et al.  Contextual and Temporal Components of Reference Price , 1994 .

[2]  Yannis Bakos,et al.  Bundling Information Goods: Pricing, Profits and Efficiency , 1998 .

[3]  Yannis Bakos,et al.  Bundling and Competition on the Internet , 1999 .

[4]  Noah Gans,et al.  Customer Loyalty and Supplier Quality Competition , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[5]  W. Kamakura,et al.  Optimal Bundling and Pricing Under a Monopoly: Contrasting Complements and Substitutes from Independently Valued Products , 2003 .

[6]  Lorin M. Hitt,et al.  Bundling with Customer Self-Selection: A Simple Approach to Bundling Low-Marginal-Cost Goods , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[7]  Yunzeng Wang,et al.  Joint Pricing-Production Decisions in Supply Chains of Complementary Products with Uncertain Demand , 2006, Oper. Res..

[8]  Samar K. Mukhopadhyay,et al.  A Bertrand model of pricing of complementary goods under information asymmetry , 2006 .

[9]  Kumar Rajaram,et al.  Bundling retail products: Models and analysis , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[10]  Z. Justin Ren,et al.  Call Center Outsourcing: Coordinating Staffing Level and Service Quality , 2008, Manag. Sci..

[11]  Lorin M. Hitt,et al.  Customized Bundle Pricing for Information Goods: A Nonlinear Mixed-Integer Programming Approach , 2008, Manag. Sci..

[12]  Jinxing Xie,et al.  Coordinating advertising and pricing in a manufacturer-retailer channel , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[13]  Anocha Aribarg,et al.  Category-Based Screening in Choice of Complementary Products , 2009 .

[14]  V. Mahajan,et al.  The design and pricing of bundles: A review of normative guidelines and practical approaches , 2009 .

[15]  V. Bilotkach Quality coordination and complementary products , 2010 .

[16]  Ruiliang Yan,et al.  The profit benefits of bundle pricing of complementary products , 2011 .

[17]  Hemant K. Bhargava,et al.  Retailer-Driven Product Bundling in a Distribution Channel , 2012, Mark. Sci..

[18]  O. Lowengart,et al.  Price–quality relationship in the presence of asymmetric dynamic reference quality effects , 2012 .

[19]  Timothy P. Derdenger,et al.  The Dynamic Effects of Bundling as a Product Strategy , 2012 .

[20]  Byungjoon Yoo,et al.  Sell by bundle or unit?: Pure bundling versus mixed bundling of information goods , 2012, Decis. Support Syst..

[21]  Xiang Fang,et al.  Capacity games for partially complementary products under multivariate random demands , 2012 .

[22]  Tiaojun Xiao,et al.  Distribution Channel Strategies for a Manufacturer with Complementary Products , 2013, Decis. Sci..

[23]  Yongjian Li,et al.  Pricing decisions for complementary products with firms' different market powers , 2013, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[24]  Jisong Kou,et al.  Numerical investigation on mixed bundling and pricing of information products , 2013 .

[25]  M. Sheikhzadeh,et al.  Product bundling: Impacts of product heterogeneity and risk considerations , 2013 .

[26]  A. Prasad,et al.  Pure Components versus Pure Bundling in a Marketing Channel , 2013 .

[27]  Vineet Kumar,et al.  The Dynamic Effects of Bundling as a Product Strategy , 2012, Mark. Sci..

[28]  Ruiliang Yan,et al.  Bundling products to success: The influence of complementarity and advertising , 2014 .

[29]  Jun Zhang,et al.  Strategic Role of Retailer Bundling in a Distribution Channel , 2015 .

[30]  V. Mahajan,et al.  Product bundling or reserved product pricing? Price discrimination with myopic and strategic consumers , 2015 .

[31]  Salma Karray,et al.  A game-theoretic model for co-promotions: Choosing a complementary versus an independent product ally ☆ , 2015 .

[32]  Yongjian Li,et al.  Price and warranty period decisions for complementary products with horizontal firms' cooperation/noncooperation strategies , 2015 .

[33]  D. Menicucci,et al.  On the Optimality of Pure Bundling for a Monopolist , 2015 .

[34]  Mihai Banciu,et al.  Optimal product bundling with dependent valuations: The price of independence , 2016, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[35]  Salma Karray,et al.  Should companies jointly promote their complementary products when they compete in other product categories? , 2016, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[36]  Jae Young Choi,et al.  Model for studying commodity bundling with a focus on consumer preference: Evidence from the Korean telecommunications market , 2016, Simul..